Are the days of closed pleural biopsy over? No

Unveiling Insights: A Comprehensive Review of the Role of Medical Thoracoscopy in Pleural Effusion Assessment

Pleural effusion, characterized by abnormal fluid accumulation in the pleural cavity, poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges across various medical conditions. This comprehensive review explores the role of medical thoracoscopy in assessing pleural effusions, providing insights into its historical context, procedural intricacies, diagnostic performance, safety considerations, and clinical applications. Medical thoracoscopy, a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure, offers advantages such as high diagnostic yield, therapeutic interventions, real-time assessment, and a minimally invasive nature. The review critically analyzes the procedure's advantages and disadvantages, including technical expertise, risk of complications, resource intensity, and patient selection criteria. Comparative analyses with alternative diagnostic modalities highlight the unique benefits of medical thoracoscopy in specific clinical scenarios. The diagnostic yield of medical thoracoscopy is examined, considering sensitivity and specificity in various contexts. Patient selection criteria, complications, and safety measures are discussed, emphasizing the importance of careful consideration in integrating thoracoscopy into clinical practice. The review further explores its clinical applications, including differentiating exudative and transudative effusions, identifying specific etiologies, and its role in treatment planning. In conclusion, medical thoracoscopy emerges as a valuable tool in the comprehensive management of pleural effusions, offering a nuanced approach to diagnosis and treatment. The evolving landscape of diagnostic modalities underscores the continued significance of medical thoracoscopy and potential advancements in the field.

The Diagnostic Value of Medical Thoracoscopy Pleural Biopsy, Ultrasound-guided Pleural Biopsy, and Closed Pleural Biopsy in Tuberculous Pleurisy: A propensity score matching analysis.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2099835/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background and objective For diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion in tuberculous pleurisy, medical thoracoscopic pleural biopsy (MTPB) enables direct vision and is most widely applied, although ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy (USPB) and closed pleural biopsy (CPB) are also viable. This retrospective study compared the diagnostic efficiencies and safety of USPB, CPB, and MTPB. Methods Patients enrolled from 2014 through 2020 underwent USPB, CPB, or MTPB (n = 69, 69, and 110, respectively). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the diagnostic sensitivities of CPB, MTPB, and USPB. The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and hospitalization stay. Results PSM analysis resulted in 40 (USPB vs. CPB), 47 (USPB vs. MTPB), and 52 (CPB vs. MTPB) matched pairs. The diagnostic sensitivities of the USPB and CPB groups were 72.5% and 55.0% (P = 0.162); that of USPB and MTPB were 70.2% and 80.9% (P = 0.337); the CPB and MTPB groups were comparable(P = 0.152). The rates of associated pain and subcutaneous emphysema of the MTPB group were higher than that of the USPB or CPB (P = 0.000, both).Hospitalization time of the MTPB group was longest, and significantly longer than that of the USPB (P = 0.029). Conclusions While the three techniques were similarly effective in diagnosing tuberculous pleurisy, USPB and CPB showed fewer associated complications and shorter hospital stays compared with MTPB. The image guidance offered by USPB benefited reduction in postoperative complications.

An uncommon cause of pleural effusion

Pleural disease is a common respiratory condition affecting ∼3000 people per million population annually [1]. Pleural effusion has multiple underlying aetiological conditions and therefore requires a systematic assessment to reach a final diagnosis. Despite detailed evaluation, there may be situations, where the aetiology of a pleural effusion remains unknown [2]. Various experts have suggested a step-wise approach in the management of these undiagnosed pleural effusions [3]. The role of detailed history, proper clinical examination and appropriate investigations, including computed tomography (CT) of chest and pleural biopsy, in an attempt to establish the correct cause of pleural effusion cannot be overemphasised. We present an interesting case of pleural effusion that was managed at our institute.

Pleural effusions are associated with various aetiologies: systematic evaluation is needed to reach a correct diagnosis. In 20% of cases the aetiology of exudative pleural effusion is elusive and pleural biopsy is required to reach a diagnosis.http://bit.ly/2HyZGVZ