ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway cuff pressure changes with and without use of nitrous oxide during laparoscopic surgery

How Much Is Too Much in a Reusable Laryngeal Mask Airway?

ProSeal^TM Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) (Teleflex Medical, Westmeath, Ireland) is a versatile and popular reusable supraglottic airway device. The manufacturer advises maximum reuse of up to 40 times. However, excessive reuse of the device can cause rare complications. Here, we report a rather uncommon complication of intraoperative cuff rupture of a PLMA probably due to the combination of a forceful metal introducer tip insertion and nitrous oxide-based anaesthesia.

Comparative study of Baska mask with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation

Background and Aims:

Several supraglottic airway devices (SGD) are available nowadays. But none has been found to be better than Proseal laryngeal mask (PLMA) in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). We aimed to compare OLP of newly introduced Baska® Mask with PLMA in patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia.

Material and Methods:

Totally, 80 consecutive adult patients of either sex requiring general anesthesia were randomized into two groups Group B (Baska mask, n = 40) or Group P (PLMA. n = 40). After standardized induction with propofol 2 − 2.5 mg/kg^-1 and fentanyl 2 mgkg^-1, and muscle relaxation with vecuronium 0.1 mgkg^-1 one of the two devices was placed. OLP (primary outcome) was measured 5 minutes and 30 minutes post induction. The time needed to achieve effective airway, anatomical alignment of the device, number of attempts, leak fraction, and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity were noted.

Results:

Both the devices could be inserted in first attempt in all the patients, but the time needed to achieve effective airway was significantly less in Group B (12.58 ± 1.81 sec vs 17.92 ± 2.45 sec, P < 0.001). The mean OLP was better in Group B at 5 min (37.6 ± 2.43 cm H₂O vs 30.82 ± 3.96 cm H₂O) and at 30 min (38.83 ± 1.72 cm H₂O vs 30.82 ± 3.96 cm H₂O; P < 0.001). Anatomical alignment of SGD with glottis (FOB grade 3 or 4 view) was significantly better in group B (34/40) as compared to group P (25/40) (p = 0.009). There was no difference in laryngopharyngeal morbidity in the two groups.

Conclusion:

Baska mask provided higher OLP, better alignment to the glottis and faster placement time as compared to PLMA.

Comparison of Intracuff Pressure and Postoperative Sore Throat Following Use of Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector With or Without Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia

PURPOSE

In general anesthesia, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is a frequently used effective option. The effect of nitrous oxide on intracuff pressure of the LMA and postoperative sore throat is well known; however, there are no studies related to the second-generation LMA Protector. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in intracuff pressure and postoperative sore throat, depending on the use of nitrous oxide during general anesthesia using the LMA Protector.

DESIGN

This randomized double-blind prospective study was conducted among 88 patients aged 20 to 70 years.

METHODS

The cuff pressure started with a baseline of 40 cm H₂O and was measured using a digital cuff pressure manometer for 30 minutes. Postoperative sore throat, dysphonia, dysphagia, and numeric rating scale scores were also recorded.

FINDINGS

Over time, the intracuff pressure of the nitrous oxide group increased significantly compared with that of the air group. Furthermore, postoperative sore throat and pharyngolaryngeal complications were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracuff pressure of the LMA Protector increased during anesthesia using nitrous oxide. When the anesthesia time was less than 2 hours, however, there was no difference in postoperative sore throat.

Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery

Context:

Supraglottic airway devices can act as an alternative to endotracheal intubation in both normal and difficult airway. LMA Proseal (P-LMA) and LMA Supreme (S-LMA) alongwith acting as effective ventilating device, provide port for gastric drainage.

Aim:

The objective of this study was to compare the two devices for effective ventilation and complications.

Setting and Design:

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Methods: 100 patients of ASA grade I–II undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included after ethical committee clearance and written consent. Patients were randomly allocated size 4 P-LMA (Group P) or S-LMA (Group S) (50 patients in each group). Insertion attempt, insertion time, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and complications were compared.

Results:

There was no difference demographically. The first insertion attempts were successful in 92% with P-LMA and 96% with S-LMA. Insertion time was faster in S-LMA. The mean OLP was 24.04 cmH2O in Group P and 20.05 cmH2O in Group S. Complications were cough, mild blood staining.

Conclusion:

Both can act as an effective ventilatory devices. But where LMA Proseal provides a more effective glottic seal by having a greater OLP, single use LMA Supreme provides acceptable glottic seal with easier and faster insertion, therefore, it can be accepted as better alternative to LMA Proseal.