Cytological diagnosis of small cell osteosarcoma of the bone

Cytomorphologic panorama of giant cell tumour of tendon sheath

BACKGROUND

Giant Cell Tumour of Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) is a slow growing benign soft tissue tumour arising from synovium of tendon sheath or joint. These tumours occur more frequently in upper limbs, especially hands. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the cytomorphological spectrum of GCTTS.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes a total of 56 cases of GCTTS diagnosed over a period of 8 years. The clinical and radiological details of these cases were retrieved from the cytopathology records and detailed cytomorphological features were studied and analysed. Histopathological correlation was done in 16/56 cases, where follow-up was available.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at the time of presentation was 32 years and were predominantly females (68%). The most common site of GCTTS was fingers (76%), followed by foot, wrist and toes. The most consistent finding on cytology was stromal cells (100%) of polygonal, spindle and plasmacytoid morphology with interspersed multinucleated osteoclastic giant cells (100%), followed by binucleated stromal cells (75%), xanthoma cells (61%) and hemosiderin laden macrophages (52%). Presence of proteinaceous fluid background was also observed in 50% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

GCTTS can be diagnosed with certainty on FNAC based on characteristic cytomorphological features in an appropriate clinical and radiological setting. FNAC plays a pivotal role in diagnosing GCTTS and differentiating it from other giant cell rich lesions, thus obviating the need of tissue biopsy for diagnosis, which in turn helps the clinician in timely and adequate management of the patient.

Cytological diagnosis of osteosarcoma with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls

INTRODUCTION

Fine needle aspiration is a well-established technique for evaluating primary and secondary bony lesions. With use in selected cases, it achieves a diagnostic yield comparable to biopsies.

METHODS

Cases of osteosarcoma (OS) with available histological follow-up were retrieved over a 10-year period. Detailed morphological evaluation was done, with special emphasis on pitfalls in the diagnosis of OS on cytology and the various variants of OS.

RESULTS

Of the 41 cases with available follow-up histology, 56% were correctly diagnosed as OS on cytology. The most common false-negative cytological diagnosis of OS, in 17% cases, was giant cell tumour. The possible explanations for this included low cellularity, minimal atypia, absence of typical osteoid, misinterpretation of metachromatic osteoid material as fibro-collagenous material and non-availability of radiology at time of aspiration.

CONCLUSION

A triple-phase evaluation including clinical evaluation, appropriate radiological correlation and cytology/histopathology, is important to clinch an accurate diagnosis.

Clarifying prognostic factors of small cell osteosarcoma: A pooled analysis of 20 cases and the literature

Introduction

Small cell osteosarcoma (SCOS) is a rare subtype of osteosarcoma, with limited studies mainly focusing on histological features. Our study aims to analyze our own patients and those reported in the literature to increase the recognition of this rare disease, to evaluate patient survival and to further determine potential prognostic factors.

Material and methods

Twenty patients with SCOS were treated in our hospital between 2010 and 2019. Their follow-up data were collected retrospectively. A total of 336 literature cases from 58 manuscripts were retrieved by means of a PubMed search with the key word “small cell osteosarcoma”. Data pertaining to treatment and follow-up were extracted. We performed a pooled analysis for the survival of patients and the risk factors for local recurrence (LR), as well as metastatic disease (MD), in a total of 160 patients using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression method.

Results

We reported our experience in diagnosing and treating SCOS. In our cases, elevated alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.013) and lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.001) significantly impaired overall survival. In the pooled analysis, SCOS was diagnosed at the median age of 17 years and affected both sexes almost equally. The median follow-up duration was 19.5 months. In the pooled analysis cases, the 5-year overall survival rate was 38.6%, and 36.4% of patients survived 10 years. However, an increasing trend was detected, indicating recent improvements in management. The surgical margin status (P = 0.024) and metastases (P = 0.008) significantly impaired overall survival, and the response to chemotherapy was related to disease-free survival (P = 0.012). LR and MD were significantly correlated (P = 0.002) and could be observed after 5 years of follow-up. LR was significantly dependent on response to chemotherapy (P = 0.020). The development of MD seemed to be affected by response to chemotherapy (P = 0.060). Correlations between imaging features and prognosis were not detected.

Conclusions

This study suggested that positive margins, poor response to chemotherapy and MD are negative prognostic factors for SCOS, implied the potential role of laboratory examinations in the survival prediction and supported the need for prolonged or more intensive surveillance in patients with MD or LR. More well-documented literatures are encouraged to allow further confirmations.