Utility of manual liquid-based cytology and conventional smears in the evaluation of various fine-needle aspiration samples

Fine needle aspiration cytology of cervical lymph nodes: Comparison of liquid based cytology (SurePath) and conventional preparation

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the first diagnostic step in patient with cervical lymphadenopathy because of its simplicity, safety and early availability of the results. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is an alternative processing method which is used for both gynecological and nongynecological samples. Literature reviewed show few studies comparing LBC with conventional preparation (CP).

AIM

The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of LBC and comparison of LBC and CP in cervical lymphadenopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, a total of 75 cases of FNAC with cervical lymphadenopathy were included. The first pass was used for CP followed by LBC with the use of SurePath (SP) technique. Both the smears were compared for cellularity, background containing blood, cell debris, lymphoglandular bodies, stromal fragments, cytoarchitectural pattern, etc., by semiquantitative scoring system.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the cellularity, cell architecture, and monolayer cells (P > .05). On the basis of background containing blood, cell debris, lympho-glandular bodies, stromal fragments (P < .001), nuclear, and cytoplasmic details (P < .05), LBC was found to be superior to CP.

CONCLUSION

LBC is a relatively simple technique and superior to CP in respect of better nuclear and cytoplasmic details with loss of background blood and debris. It has a diagnostic accuracy equivalent to that of CP. However, use of both LBC and CP can result in better diagnostic accuracy.

A comparative study of two liquid-based preparation methods: membrane-based and sedimentation in fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis in thyroid nodules

Background

As thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) shows a certain limitation in the diagnosis of conventional smears, novel approaches like liquid-based cytology (LBC) have been gradually applied recently. Studies have shown the difference between the conventional smears (CSs) and liquid-based smears on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) diagnosis, but the impacts of different liquid-based preparation (LBP) methods, including membrane-based and sedimentation, on diagnosis are still not clear. In this study, the effects of liquid-based smears prepared by different methods on the cytological interpretation were studied.

Methods

A total of 221 thyroid liquid-based FNAC cases from January 2017 to October 2018 were collected. We retrospectively studied and compared the effects of the membrane-based and sedimentation LBP methods through The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBS) diagnosis and risk of malignancy assessment. Besides, we made an evaluation on the diagnostic differences in the effects of different preparation methods on the cell morphology and tissue structure of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) for more accurate FNAC diagnosis.

Results

Among the 221 cases reviewed, membrane-based method was applied in 153 cases and sedimentation in 68 cases. According to the diagnostic criteria of 2017 TBS, TBSVI and TBSV thyroid could be cytologically diagnosed by membrane-based (49.0% (75/153) and 25.5% (39/153)) and sedimentation (52.9(36/68) and 25(17/68)) methods, and both were confirmed as PTC through histopathological diagnosis after operation, with the malignancy degree as high as 100%. In addition, of the 30 cases that were diagnosed as TBSIII thyroid nodules with the membrane-based method, 15 cases were pathologically malignant after an operation, with the malignancy degree of 50% (15/30), while that in 11 cases using the sedimentation method was 45.4% (5/11). PTC could be detected in both the TBSIV and TBSII thyroid nodules diagnosed by membrane-based method, with the sensitivity of 87.0% (114/131) lower than that by sedimentation method (91.4% (53/58)), showing the lower consistency with the histopathological result (K = 0.635 vs K = 0.757). Among the membrane-based smears, 23.5% (36/153) had fewer follicular epithelial cells, 55.6% (20/36) of which were considered to be suspicious for PTC from cell karyotype and tissue arrangement. While among the sedimentation smears, 16.2% (11/68) had fewer follicular epithelial cells, and 63.6% (7/11) was suspicious for PTC. In 72.5% (95/131) membrane-based smears of PTC, the papillary and swirling structures were not obvious, showing as crowded syncytial cell masses, while in 55.2% (32/58) sedimentation smears, both structures were visible with obvious three-dimensional papillary structure, and the fibrovascular axis still remained.

Conclusion

LBP technique is feasible for FNAC diagnosis, and the sedimentation shows more advantages, like higher PTC detection rate and good consistency with postoperative histopathological diagnosis. A clear understanding of the subtle differences in the effects of membrane-based and sedimentation methods on the cell morphology and tissue structure could be conducive to the definitive diagnosis of PTC before operation.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Liquid-Based Cytology in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Pancreatic Mass Lesions During the Learning Curve: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology widely varies depending on the treatment method used. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has gained popularity in the gynecological field because of its efficacy in collection of target cells and simplicity in the manipulation of specimens. Since the introduction of EUS-FNA at our institution, we have used LBC for the diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of EUS-FNA with LBC in patients with pancreatic mass lesions during the learning curve for EUS-FNA.

METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively enrolled 222 patients with pancreatic mass lesions who were diagnosed using EUS-FNA with LBC between 2011 and 2016. The diagnostic yields for EUS-FNA with LBC for pancreatic mass lesions were evaluated.

RESULTS

The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for malignancy were found to be 93.9%, 95.1%, and 94.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that EUS-FNA with LBC for specimens provides good diagnostic efficacy in patients with pancreatic mass lesions even during the learning curve for EUS-FNA.

Factors that Influence Sample Adequacy in Liquid-Based Cytology after Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: A Single-Center Study

OBJECTIVE

The factors that influence the acquisition of adequate samples during liquid-based cytology (LBC) remain unclear. This study aimed to identify factors that affect cytological adequacy in LBC after ultrasonography (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) of thyroid nodules.

STUDY DESIGN

From January 2017 to May 2017, a single radiologist performed US-FNA to diagnose 112 thyroid nodules in 112 consecutive patients. Based on US findings after US-FNA, the size, location, position, composition, calcification, and vascularity of each nodule, as well as the US-based diagnosis, were investigated by the same radiologist. Blinded to US information, a single cytopathologist investigated cytological adequacy, cytological cellularity, and Bethesda category.

RESULTS

Of the 112 thyroid nodules, cytological adequacy was achieved in 91.1% (102/112). Thyroid nodules with sizes ≥20 mm or those that were predominantly cystic showed a higher rate of cytological inadequacy (p < 0.05). Thyroid nodule location, position, calcification status, and vascularity did not influence cytological adequacy, nor did US-based diagnosis (p > 0.05). Nodule composition or calcification significantly influenced cytological cellularity (p < 0.05), whereas nodule size, location, position, vascularity, and US-based diagnosis did not (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Most investigated factors did not influence cytological adequacy or cellularity.

Diagnostic Utility and Efficacy of Conventional Versus SurePath® Liquid-based Cytology in Head and Neck Pathology: A Study in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is an emerging pathological method for better establishment of the diagnosis in almost all the organs of the body. It is currently used both for the gynecological and non-gynecological (fine-needle aspirates (FNAs)/fluid) specimens in most of the developed and few developing countries. The current study aimed at assessing and illustrating the cytological morphology on SurePath® LBC technique when used on FNAs from head and neck lesions, compared to the conventional smears (CS).

METHODS

In the current prospective study, a total of 1000 FNAs obtained from swellings of head and neck region were simultaneously processed both by the standard conventional and SurePath® LBC techniques. Both of these preparations were studied, compared with a semi-quantitative scoring system, and statistically analyzed. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

LBC smears were better, compared to CS ones, due to the presence of evenly dispersed cells (P≤0.001), clearance of obscuring elements / background debris (P≤0.001), and better cellular details (P≤0.001). However, these abilities of LBC often became its own nemesis and made the interpretation difficult.

CONCLUSION

LBC, though costly, is an acceptable, simple, and valuable technique. However, CS still cannot be considered inferior to it, and it is recommended that in most of the cases LBC, along with CS, should be reported before reaching a final diagnosis. This is beneficial especially in the developing countries such as India where most of the centers are devoid of LBC technique and hence, are not familiar with many cytomorphological features and potential diagnostic pitfalls unique to it.