Liquid-based versus conventional cytology in solid pediatric neoplasm: Comparison of their diagnostic and morphological spectra

Guided Needle Aspirations of Intra-Abdominal Masses: Analogy between Liquid-Based and Conventional Smear Preparation Methods

OBJECTIVE

Image-guided fine needle aspiration cytology with conventional smear (CS) preparation offers onsite cellular adequacy evaluation; however, it still provides false negatives due to faulty smear preparations. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) can be advantageous in these scenarios. Hence, with an aim to investigate utility of LBC in these samples, we carried out the above study with objectives to find diagnostic accuracy of LBC and agreement of LBC with CS methods in guided aspiration samples from intra-abdominal masses.

METHODS

A prospective observational study, of 113 patients with clinical or radiological diagnosis of intra-abdominal masses, was carried out. SurePath BD™ was used for LBC smear preparation, and the standard protocol was used for CS preparation.

RESULTS

LBC alone was diagnostic in 80.8% of the cases, and CS alone was diagnostic in 71.2% cases (agreement was 83.7%, p = 0.03). Cellular morphology was better preserved in LBC; however, interpretation was easier in CS.

CONCLUSION

CS may be complimented with LBC sample collection method to enhance the sensitivity of intra-abdominal FNA.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with liquid-based cytology preparation in the diagnosis of metastatic small-cell carcinoma in the pancreas

Pancreatic metastasis is extremely rare, particularly from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Studies on the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with liquid-based cytology (LBC) in the diagnosis of metastatic small-cell carcinoma in the pancreas have been rarely conducted. We report herein a case of pancreatic metastasis from SCLC diagnosed using EUS-FNA with LBC (ThinPrep). A 71-year-old man presented with chief complaints of hemoptysis and jaundice over the past 1 month. Lung & pancreas tumors with multiple liver nodules were detected on computed tomography. The aspirated material from the pancreas using EUS-FNA was prepared as a cytologic specimen with ThinPrep method, which revealed scattered and clustered "small blue cells" with scant cytoplasm and stippled chromatin with frequent apoptotic bodies. Immunocytochemical staining of the cellblock material revealed strong positivity for CD56 and thyroid transcription factor-1. Endobronchial biopsy for lung mass revealed nests of small, round, blue tumor cells with hyperchromatic nuclei showing salt and pepper chromatin, scant cytoplasm, and brisk mitotic activity. Therefore, a diagnosis of metastatic small-cell carcinoma to the pancreas with an extensive stage was finally made.

Diagnostic Utility and Efficacy of Conventional Versus SurePath® Liquid-based Cytology in Head and Neck Pathology: A Study in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is an emerging pathological method for better establishment of the diagnosis in almost all the organs of the body. It is currently used both for the gynecological and non-gynecological (fine-needle aspirates (FNAs)/fluid) specimens in most of the developed and few developing countries. The current study aimed at assessing and illustrating the cytological morphology on SurePath® LBC technique when used on FNAs from head and neck lesions, compared to the conventional smears (CS).

METHODS

In the current prospective study, a total of 1000 FNAs obtained from swellings of head and neck region were simultaneously processed both by the standard conventional and SurePath® LBC techniques. Both of these preparations were studied, compared with a semi-quantitative scoring system, and statistically analyzed. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

LBC smears were better, compared to CS ones, due to the presence of evenly dispersed cells (P≤0.001), clearance of obscuring elements / background debris (P≤0.001), and better cellular details (P≤0.001). However, these abilities of LBC often became its own nemesis and made the interpretation difficult.

CONCLUSION

LBC, though costly, is an acceptable, simple, and valuable technique. However, CS still cannot be considered inferior to it, and it is recommended that in most of the cases LBC, along with CS, should be reported before reaching a final diagnosis. This is beneficial especially in the developing countries such as India where most of the centers are devoid of LBC technique and hence, are not familiar with many cytomorphological features and potential diagnostic pitfalls unique to it.