Indian Council of Medical Research consensus document for the management of buccal mucosa cancer

Long-term outcomes of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy on borderline resectable oral cavity cancers: Real-world data of 3266 patients and implications for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by response assessment is the standard treatment algorithm for locally advanced oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OCSCC) in the Indian subcontinent. The 3-drug NACT regimen (Docetaxel-Cisplatin-5-FU) has shown improvement in overall survival over 2-drug regimen (Docetaxel-Cisplatin) in a phase-3 randomised study. We have analysed the 10-year outcomes with this treatment algorithm.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset of borderline resectable OCSCC patients who underwent NACT. Patients who became resectable after NACT underwent surgery followed by appropriate adjuvant therapy. Patients who were unresectable received definitive chemoradiation (CTRT), palliative chemotherapy, radiotherapy or best supportive care based on general condition.

RESULTS

A total of 3266 patients were included. The most common subsite was buccal mucosa and the most frequent indication was peri-tumoral edema upto zygoma. More than 2-drugs NACT was offered to 32.9% patients. Overall, 32.5% patients had a response to NACT. A total of 1358 patients were offered curative treatment, of which 929 (32%) underwent surgery and the rest underwent definitive chemo-radiation (14.8%). Patients who received more than 2-drugs NACT versus those who received 2-drugs had a 10-years OS of 21% vs 5.1% (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent surgery versus those who did not had a 10-year OS of 21.8% vs 4.1% (p < 0.001). Patients who achieved pCR had a 5-year OS of 45.3% vs 13.3% for those who did not (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

NACT leads to long term survival benefit in patients of borderline resectable oral cavity cancer.

Elective Neck Dissection for cT1-4 N0M0 Head and Neck Verrucous Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the survival benefit of elective neck dissection (END) over neck observation in cT1-4 N0M0 head and neck verrucous carcinoma (HNVC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The 2006 to 2017 National Cancer Database.

METHODS

Patients with surgically resected cT1-4 N0M0 HNVC were selected. Linear, binary logistic, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were utilized.

RESULTS

Of 1015 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 223 (22.0%) underwent END. The majority of patients were male (55.4%) and white (91.0%) with disease of the oral cavity (67.6%) classified as low grade (90.0%) and cT1-2 (81.8%). The minority of ENDs (4.0%) detected occult nodal metastases. The rate of END increased from 2006 to 2017 for both cT1-2 (16.3% vs 22.0%, p = .126, R2  = 0.405) and cT3-4 (41.7% vs 70.0%, p = .424, R2  = 0.232) disease but these trends were not statistically significant. Independent predictors of undergoing END included treatment at an academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-2.55), cT3-4 disease (aOR: 3.31, 95% CI: 2.16-5.07), and tumor diameter (aOR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.19) (p < 0.05). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients treated with and without END was 71.3% and 70.6%, respectively (p = .661). END did not significantly reduce the 5-year hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.91-1.71, p = .172). END did not significantly improve 5-year OS in univariate and multivariate analyses stratified by several patient, facility, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

CONCLUSION

END does not confer an appreciable survival benefit in HNVC, even after stratifying univariate and multivariate analyses by several patient, facility, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Outcome Analysis of Advanced Oral Cancers Requiring Large Composite Fibular Osteocutaneous Flap Reconstruction: Experience From a Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital

BACKGROUND

Advanced oral cancer entailing extensive resection of large parts of the mucosa, bone, and skin require reconstructions with composite free flaps. Our aim was to analyze the outcomes of those oral squamous cell carcinomas requiring fibular osteocutaneous free flaps with large skin defects.

METHODS

Perioperative course and histopathological and survival outcomes of 246 consecutive patients warranting composite fibular flaps from January 2010 to June 2015 at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Despite majority of T4 disease (88.2%) and stage IV disease (92%) patients, the 5-year overall survival was 52.1% and the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 48.6% with a median follow-up of 42 months with minimal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction with composite fibular osteocutaneous flaps has comparable outcomes of survival with acceptable complications in mega oral squamous cell carcinomas requiring extensive resection.

In spite of successful curative surgery for buccal mucosa carcinoma the health-related quality-of-life continues to remain poor

BACKGROUND

In early stage buccal mucosa carcinoma, in spite of successful curative surgery, the health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) may not improve. We aimed to study HRQoL in these patients who had undergone successful curative surgery and determined factors that influence the HRQoL.

METHODS

Subjects, aged 18-70 years, who had undergone successful curative surgery for stage I and II buccal mucosa cancer, were assessed for HRQoL using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire and factors affecting HRQoL were determined. Their scores were compared with normative reference scores.

RESULTS

54 patients (stages I 54%, II 46%) aged 44 ± 11 years (87% males) were studied. They had undergone curative surgery a median of 8.5 (IQR 4-13.5) months ago. Their mean global HRQoL score was 77 ± 30, with significantly poorer scores compared to reference in domains of appearance, activity, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder, saliva, mood and anxiety. Anxiety, activity, and chewing were considered the most important domains by the patients. Among the factors influencing HRQoL, duration since surgery was the most important factor, and patients with recent surgery had worse performance in chewing, saliva and mood. Patients with stage II had worse performance in shoulder and anxiety compared to stage I. Post-operative radiotherapy worsened swallowing and shoulder function.

CONCLUSION

In spite of successful curative surgery for buccal mucosa carcinoma, the HRQoL continues to remain sub-optimal with poor scores in most of the domains. These domains must be focused on with appropriate measures in order to improve overall HRQoL in patients after successful curative surgery.

Oral Cancer in the Indian Subcontinent-Survival Outcomes and Risk Factors with Primary Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To assess the oncological outcome and prognostic factors for primary Oral Squamous Cell Cancer (OSCC) staged as per AJCC 8th pTNM, and treated by the contemporary standard of primary surgery and pathology directed adjuvant radiation-chemoradiation.

METHODS

A single institution cohort from a tertiary care academic institution in North India. Case inclusion 2013 to 2016; n = 218, median follow-up 35 months. All patients were restaged as per the AJCC 8th pTNM classification. Analysis for Overall Survival (OS), Disease-free Survival(DFS), and factors impacting outcome (Cox proportionate model Multivariate analysis).

RESULTS

AJCC pTNM 7th to 8th edition conversion led to upstaging in 16.5%. Stage-II demonstrated greatest stage migration and apparent improvement in OS and DFS (P < .09). Discordance was noted between the presurgical (clinico-radiologic) and postsurgical (pathological) nodal status in 40.3% (88/218; 54 pathologically upstaged;34 downstaged). Pathological downstaging was particularly significant with advanced stage Gingivo-Buccal Cancers (25/73-34.7%). Stage-I-II early cancers had 3 years. OS-86.7% and DFS-78.8%; Stage-III-IV advanced cancers had 3 years. OS-56.7% and DFS-46.6%. Multivariate analysis identified poorer OS and DFS for age < 40 years (HR-1.8; 2.0), skin involvement (HR-2.1; 2.6) and pN+ status (HR-2.4; 3.5). Bone involvement did not compromise survival in this surgically treated set of patients.

CONCLUSION

Age < 45 is newly identified as significantly compromising DFS and OS in Oral Cancer. Established factors of skin involvement and pN+ are confirmed as impacting DFS-OS. An apparent improvement in survival in Stage II Cancers is noted as consequent to adoption of AJCC 8th edition staging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (OCEBM 2011-Inception Cohort Study for Prognosis) Laryngoscope, 2021.

Tumor-host interface in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Impact on nodal metastasis and prognosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate tumor-host interface in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by the Brandwein-Gensler histological risk score (BG risk score); to assess its association with clinicopathological features and impact on survival outcomes in a contemporary cohort staged as per AJCC 8th edition pTNM classification.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care centre included 178 cases of OSCC treated by primary surgical resection from 2013 to 2016. Pathological lymph node status, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

BG risk score assessment categorized 25 (14%) cases as low-risk, 93 (52%) as intermediate-risk, and 60 (34%) as high-risk. BG risk score category progression from low to intermediate to high risk was associated with an incremental risk of worsening pN status, DFS, and OS. BG risk score categories significantly demarcated 2-year DFS (96% in low-risk, 51.6% in intermediate-risk, 15% in high-risk; p < 0.001) and OS (96% in low-risk, 66.7% in intermediate-risk, 31.3% in high-risk; p < 0.001). On stratified analysis, BG risk score could further demarcate prognosis in early (I/II) and late (III/IV) stage subgroups (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated the prognostic impact of BG risk score categories to be additional to, and of equal magnitude to, impact of pTNM stage.

CONCLUSIONS

BG risk score is a powerful prognostic tool in OSCC additional to pTNM staging. It can enable risk stratification and inform decisions regarding post-surgical adjuvant treatment. It is undertaken with routine histopathological evaluation, with no increased expense or turnaround time. A case is made for its inclusion in OSCC reporting guidelines.

Effect of Hypofractionated, Palliative Radiotherapy on Quality of Life in Late-Stage Oral Cavity Cancer: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Context:

The study was designed to evaluate the effect of a hypofractionated, palliative conformal radiotherapy regimen of 5250 cGy in 15 fractions in inoperable/incurable oral cavity carcinoma.

Aims:

The primary objective was to assess the change in the quality of life (QOL) with respect to pain and mouth opening pre- and post-radiotherapy using standardized questionnaires. The secondary objective was to assess overall QOL using the same questionnaires and also to assess response rates, survival, compliance, early and late toxicity.

Settings and Design:

This was a single-arm, prospective trial. Patients with incurable oral cavity cancer referred for palliative intent radiotherapy to the Department of Radiotherapy, RCC, JIPMER were recruited into the study.

Subjects and Methods:

Forty-eight patients were recruited and twenty-five patients were given conformal radiotherapy to a dose of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions. QOL was assessed using the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires before and 2 months after the completion of radiotherapy. The response assessment was made using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria 2 months after radiotherapy. The early and late toxicities were assessed at 2 months and 6 months after radiotherapy completion, respectively.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Sample size was calculated to be 53. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare QOL scores pre- and post-radiotherapy. Median survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results:

There was a significant improvement in the pain, mouth opening, speech, social contact, social eating, felt ill items of the EORTC QLQ-H and N35 questionnaire and role functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, financial difficulties, and Global QOL subscales of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. 72% of the patients had grade 3 acute radiation oral mucositis and 36% had grade 3 acute radiation dermatitis. There were no significant treatment breaks due to toxicity. There were no grade 3 late toxicities observed. Overall median survival was 5.1 months. The overall response rate was 47%. The median time to treatment completion was 24 days.

Conclusions:

The improvement in QOL parameters suggests that the regimen of 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions is suitable for palliative intent radiotherapy in late-stage oral cavity cancer for effective palliation for short periods.

Radiation Oncology in India: Challenges and Opportunities

Rising cancer incidence and mortality in India emphasize the need to address the increasing burden of this disease and the stark inequities in access to radiotherapy and other essential medical treatments. State-of-the-art technology is available within the private sector and a few hospitals in the public sector, but 75% of patients in the public sector in India do not have access to timely radiotherapy. This inequity in access to radiotherapy in the public sector is amplified in rural areas, where most of India׳s population lives. A long-term government commitment to machine purchase and human resource development in the public sector is needed to improve access. A number of innovative initiatives to improve cancer treatment and access have emerged that could support such an investment. These include local production of equipment, twinning programs between institutions in high- and low-income countries to exchange knowledge and expertise, and nongovernmental and state-sponsored schemes to sponsor and support patients in their cancer journey. Strengthening of cancer registries and regulatory bodies with authority to enforce minimum standards is also required to improve care. The more uniform and frequent availability of high-quality radiotherapy can improve cancer outcomes and may be regarded as a marker of a comprehensive and equitable system of health care delivery.

Compliance With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in T4 Oral Cancers: Place, Person, Socioeconomic Status, or Assistance

PURPOSE

Approximately 15% to 20% of our patients with head and neck cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) discontinue therapy because of various nonmedical reasons. We sought to analyze the factors associated with treatment default and noncompliance among these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with T4 oral cancer treated with NACT between January 2011 and December 2012. We included patients who discontinued treatment for nonmedical reasons before the second cycle of NACT. The factors analyzed were income, education, socioeconomic status, age, sex, place of residence, habits, and payment pattern (government supported or personal capacity). Pearson χ² test was used to identify significant factors associated with noncompliance.

RESULTS

Of 486 patients, 91 patients (18.7%) were noncompliant. Percentages of noncompliant patients in the age groups < 30, between 30 and 60, and > 60 years were 25.0%, 17.4%, and 25.5%, respectively (P = .27). Percentages of noncompliance in patients residing within the city, same state, or different state were 20.7%, 20.9%, and 17.1%, respectively (P = .44). Noncompliance rates were 20.3%, 15.7%, 18.1%, and 22.5% in upper middle, lower middle, upper lower, and lower economic strata, respectively (P = .60). Similarly, there was no significant difference in noncompliance according to occupation, education level, payment pattern, sex, or habits.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis failed to identify any specific significant factor associated with noncompliance with NACT among our patients with T4 oral cancers.