Addition of gemcitabine to standard therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized comparative study

Reconstruction and analysis of circRNA‑miRNA‑mRNA network in the pathology of cervical cancer

The present study was performed with the aim of understanding the mechanisms of pathogenesis and providing novel biomarkers for cervical cancer by constructing a regulatory circular (circ)RNA‑micro (mi)RNA‑mRNA network. Using an adjusted P-value of <0.05 and an absolute log value of fold-change >1, 16 and 156 miRNAs from GSE30656 and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), 5,321 mRNAs from GSE63514, 4,076 mRNAs from cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (from TCGA) and 75 circRNAs from GSE102686 were obtained. Using RNAhybrid, Venn and UpSetR plot, 12 circRNA‑miRNA pairs and 266 miRNA‑mRNA pairs were obtained. Once these pairs were combined, a circRNA‑miRNA‑mRNA network with 11 circRNA nodes, 4 miRNA nodes, 153 mRNA nodes and 203 edges was constructed. By constructing the protein‑protein interaction network using Molecular Complex Detection scores >5 and >5 nodes, 7 hubgenes (RRM2, CEP55, CHEK1, KIF23, RACGAP1, ATAD2 and KIF11) were identified. By mapping the 7 hubgenes into the preliminary circRNA‑miRNA‑mRNA network, a circRNA‑miRNA‑hubgenes network consisting of 5 circRNAs (hsa_circRNA_000596, hsa_circRNA_104315, hsa_circRNA_400068, hsa_circRNA_101958 and hsa_circRNA_103519), 2 mRNAs (hsa‑miR‑15b and hsa‑miR‑106b) and 7 mRNAs (RRM2, CEP55, CHEK1, KIF23, RACGAP1, ATAD2 and KIF11) was constructed. There were 22 circRNA‑miRNA‑mRNA regulatory axes identified in the subnetwork. By analyzing the overall survival for the 7 hubgenes using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis tool, higher expression of RRM2 was demonstrated to be associated with a significantly poorer overall survival. PharmGkb analysis identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of rs5030743 and rs1130609 of RRM2, which can be treated with cladribine and cytarabine. RRM2 was also indicated to be involved in the gemcitabine pathway. The 5 circRNAs (hsa_circRNA_000596, hsa_circRNA_104315, hsa_circRNA_400068, hsa_circRNA_101958 and hsa_circRNA_103519) may function as competing endogenous RNAs and serve critical roles in cervical cancer. In addition, cytarabine may produce similar effects to gemcitabine and may be an optional chemotherapeutic drug for treating cervical cancer by targeting rs5030743 and rs1130609 or other similar SNPs. However, the specific mechanism of action should be confirmed by further study.

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of the Various Therapeutic Options in Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Treatment options in locally advanced cervix cancer (LACC) have evolved around radiation therapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CT), hypoxic cell sensitizers, immunomodulators (Imm), and locoregional moderate hyperthermia (HT). A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the evidence for efficacy and safety in terms of long-term locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and grade ≥3 acute morbidity (AM) and late morbidity (LM). Five databases were searched, and 6285 articles (1974-2018) were screened per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Fifty-nine randomized trials in untreated LACC without surgical intervention were shortlisted. These used 13 different interventions: RT alone and/or neoadjuvant CT (NACT), adjuvant CT (ACT), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CTRT) (weekly cisplatin [CDDP]/3-weekly CDDP/combination CT with CDDP/non-CDDP-based CT), hypoxic cell sensitizers, Imm, or HT. Odds ratios (ORs) using random effects network meta-analysis were estimated. Interventions for each endpoint were ranked according to their corresponding surface under cumulative ranking curve values. Of the 9894 patients evaluated, the total events reported for LRC, OS, AM, and LM were 5431 of 8197, 4482 of 7958, 1710 of 7183, and 441 of 6333, respectively. ORs and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for the 2 best strategies were HT + RT versus CTRT + ACT (OR, 1.23; 95% CrI, 0.49-3.19) for LRC, CTRT (3-weekly CDDP) versus HTCTRT (OR, 1.14; 95% CrI, 0.35-3.65) for OS, RT + ACT versus RT (OR, 0.01; 95% CrI, 0.00-1.04) for AM, and NACT + RT + ACT versus RT + Imm (OR, 0.42; 95% CrI, 0.02-7.39) for LM. The 3 interventions with the highest cumulative surface under cumulative ranking curve values for all 4 endpoints were HTRT, HTCTRT, and CTRT (3-weekly CDDP). Articles with low risk of bias and those published during 2004 to 2018 also retained these interventions as the best. Two-step cluster analysis grouped these 3 modalities in a single distinctive cluster. HTRT, HTCTRT, and CTRT with 3-weekly CDDP were identified as therapeutic modalities with the best comprehensive impact on key clinical endpoints in LACC. This warrants a phase 3 randomized trial among these strategies for a head-to-head comparison and additional validation.

Knowledge and Perception Towards Cervical Cancer among Female Debre Berhan University Students

Background: Cervical cancer is a global public health problem with around five hundred thirty thousand new cases and two hundred sixty five thousand deaths annually in 2015. Risky behaviors, lack of knowledge and preventative measures in young women, increase the risks of cervical cancer later in life. Up to date, there is scarcity of study on level of knowledge and perception towards cervical cancer among young women in Ethiopia. So, this study was aimed to determine the level of knowledge and perception toward cervical cancer among female regular undergraduate Debre Berhan University students. Methods: A facility based cross-sectional study was conducted using self-administered questionnaire among female regular DBU students from May to June, 2015. Two stage cluster sampling technique was used for the study. Data was entered and cleaned in Epi info and imported to SPSS for analysis. Binary logistic regression was carried out to determine factors of good knowledge on cervical cancer. P-value less than 0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Results: Eighty-four (14.5%) of the study participants were sexually active. Of the participants, 232(40.5%) had heard of cervical cancer but only 195 (35.6%) had good knowledge towards cervical cancer and of the study participants, only 185 (33.2%) perceived as they are susceptible for cervical cancer. Using radio and TV as source of information [AOR= 1.918 (95% CI: 1.223, 3.010)], having information about sexually transmitted infections (STI) [AOR =3.030 (95% CI: 1.665, 5.514)] were significantly and independently associated with good knowledge on cervical cancer. Conclusions: The level of knowledge towards cervical cancer and perception of acquiring the disease was poor. Health education interventions are needed to improve the awareness and health seeking behavior in youth women thereby preventing cervical cancer related morbidity and mortality.

Predictors of tumor response in carcinoma of uterine cervix: data from tertiary cancer centre in India

AIM

The current study was a retrospective analysis to identify the predictors of tumor response among cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation and completed the intended treatment.

METHODS

Hundred and twenty eight patients who completed the intended therapy as per institute protocol evaluated. Patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy to a dose of 50 Gy in 27 fractions followed by 21 Gy in three sessions by intracavitory radiotherapy to point A. Postoperative patients received 16 Gy in two sessions. Predictors of tumor response after treatment were assessed using cox regression.

RESULTS

Median time to complete tumor response was 12.2 months. Clinical stage emerged as the independent prognostic factor. Patients who completed chemotherapy treatment in fewer than five cycles had a non-significant increased chance of tumor response compared to those completing in five or more cycles.

CONCLUSION

Poor tumor response after treatment is largely explained by advanced disease stage at diagnosis. A strategy for early detection and access to screening facilities will improve outcome. Fewer chemotherapy cycles may be beneficial in patients with locally advanced carcinoma cervix.

New pharmacotherapy options for cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in females worldwide. Incorporation of chemotherapy to radiation in locally advanced disease and molecular targeted therapy for advanced disease has increased survival; nevertheless, there is room for further improvement.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to discuss major recent advances in the treatment of invasive cervical cancer from randomized Phase III trials and ongoing late-stage developments.

EXPERT OPINION

Combination chemotherapy concurrent with radiation plus adjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated better survival rates as compared to standard cisplatin chemoradiation and ongoing Phase III trials would eventually confirm these findings. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are the most evaluated agents added to cisplatin chemoradiation and in the adjuvant setting. Further survival gains combining classical cytotoxics will be limited by toxicity, hence, novel antitumor drugs; in particular angiogenesis inhibitors must be evaluated to increase the efficacy of current chemoradiation regimens. In advanced disease, modest survival gains were recently achieved with cisplatin doublets as compared to single agent cisplatin. Bevacizumab added to standard chemotherapy has for the first time demonstrated that targeted agents are valuable in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Ongoing Phase III trials for cervical cancer are limited reflecting the shortage of promising molecules and the need to increase research efforts for this disease.