Laparoscopic Treatment of Median Arcuate Ligament Syndrome: A Rare Cause of Chronic Severe Abdominal Pain

DUNBAR SYNDROME: CLINICAL MANIFESTATION IN ADULTS, DIAGNOSTIC PROBLEMS (CASE REPORT)

In this case we used CBC and biochemical tests, ECG, ultrasound of the abdominal cavity and heart, CT scan with and without IV contrast. Women with complains on recurrent severe abdominal pain in epigastric region and right part of the abdomen radiating to the back, nausea, vomiting. Making laboratory and instrumental tests for confirmation of the diagnosis. Surgical treatment of DS was performed and after one year of the follow up there were no complications. DS may mimic other medical conditions such as gallbladder diseases, gastritis/peptic ulcer, appendicitis, colorectal malignancy, hepatitis, atherosclerotic diseases etc. That is why DS is a diagnosis of exclusion. This case illustrates pathway to find correct diagnosis and improve management tactic.

Median arcuate ligament (Dunbar) syndrome: Laparoscopic management and clinical outcomes of a single centre

Background:

Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is a condition characterised by chronic abdominal symptoms associated with median arcuate ligament (MAL) compression of the coeliac artery.

Aim:

In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic treatment in patients with MALS.

Materials and Methods:

The data of ten patients with MALS who were subjected to laparoscopic sectioning of the MAL were retrospectively reviewed. The following data were evaluated: age, gender, clinical and diagnostic test findings, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, operative findings and complications and mortality, hospital stay duration and hospital readmission. The diagnosis of MALS was established by computed tomography (CT) angiography.

Results:

Six (60%) of ten patients with MALS were female and four (40%) were male. The mean age was 42.4 ± 12.3. The main symptoms were epigastric pain (100%) and weight loss (60%). CT angiography showed high-grade stenosis of the anterior wall of the proximal coeliac trunk and post-stenotic dilation caused by extrinsic compression of the MAL. Surgical procedure was uneventful in all patients. Operating time was 155.5 min (120–200) and intra-operative blood loss was 150 ml (100–250). Length of stay was 3.1 day (2–9), with no mortality. The post-operative complications developed in two female patients. One of them developed ileus and the other patient developed pulmonary thromboembolism. At 6-month follow-up, all patients were asymptomatic.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic decompression is an effective treatment for MALS and can provide symptomatic relief. This method may be the preferred modality of treatment in view of its lack of morbidity and good results.

Laparoscopic treatment of median arcuate ligament syndrome: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) is an uncommon condition caused by the extrinsic compression of the celiac trunk (CT) and celiac ganglion, secondary to an anatomical abnormality of the median arcuate ligament fibers. It is characterized by postprandial epigastric pain, chronic abdominal pain, weight loss, nausea and vomiting. MALS is typically diagnosed after the exclusion of other, more common conditions; however, a variety of imaging and diagnostic modalities, including Duplex ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, gastric tonometry and angiography can suggest findings consistent with MALS.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Laparoscopic approach has been proposed as the option of choice for the treatment of these patients. A systematic review of the international literature regarding this modality of treatment is presented here.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The review included 504 cases, and several principles are suggested to improve the management. The advantages of this minimally invasive technique include short operative time (136.0 minutes, range 70-242), shorter hospital stay (3.8 days, range 0.5-7) and low rate of conversion to open surgery (4.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Various treatment modalities are available to decompress the celiac trunk. Although open surgery has been traditionally accepted as the gold standard, laparoscopic division of the MALS has proven equal results. Others have described different treatment modalities, including bypass surgery and endovascular procedures (angioplasty or stent placement). Laparoscopic approaches to correct MALS are feasible and safe. It may be the preferred modality of treatment in view of its lack of morbidity, shorter hospital stay and good results.