Mild therapeutic hypothermia in patients resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Targeted Temperature Management in Unconscious Survivors of Postcardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Targeted temperature management (TTM) is a vital element of postresuscitation management after cardiac arrest. Though international guidelines recommend TTM, the supporting evidence is of low certainty.

Aims and objectives

To estimate the effect of TTM strategy on mortality and neurological outcomes in postcardiac arrest survivors.

Materials and methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English evaluating the use of TTM in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest were included. Studies were categorized into two groups, based on hypothermia vs normothermia. The main outcome was death due to any origin. The secondary outcome measures evaluated neurological outcome and complications associated with TTM. Outcomes were analyzed by calculating Odds Ratio (OR) of a worse outcome. ORs with 95% CIs in a forest plot were used to show the results of random-effects meta-analyses.

Results

On pooled analysis of 11 RCTs, no difference was observed in death due to any origin rates in the hypothermia compared to the normothermia group (OR; 0.88, 95% CI: 0.39–1.16). Overall, no difference in poor neurological outcome was observed between the two groups (OR; 0.86, 95% CI: 0.66–1.12). Trial sequencing analysis for mortality and poor neurological outcome showed that number to achieve power to predict futility has been achieved in both the parameters.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed that hypothermia compared to normothermia TTM strategies does not improve survival or neurologic outcomes.

How to cite this article

Mishra SB, Patnaik R, Rath A, Samal S, Dash A, Nayak B. Targeted Temperature Management in Unconscious Survivors of Postcardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):506–513.

Targeted Temperature Management After Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Targeted temperature management (TTM) with therapeutic hypothermia is an integral component of postarrest care for survivors. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to demonstrate the benefit of TTM on clinical outcomes. We sought to determine if the pooled data from available RCTs support the use of prehospital and/or in-hospital TTM after cardiac arrest.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of SCOPUS, Elsevier's abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, from 1966 to November 2016 was performed using predefined criteria. Therapeutic hypothermia was defined as any strategy that aimed to cool post-cardiac arrest survivors to a temperature ≤34°C. Normothermia was temperature of ≥36°C. We compared mortality and neurologic outcomes in patients by categorizing the studies into 2 groups: (1) hypothermia versus normothermia and (2) prehospital hypothermia versus in-hospital hypothermia using standard meta-analytic methods. A random effects modeling was utilized to estimate comparative risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The hypothermia and normothermia strategies were compared in 5 RCTs with 1389 patients, whereas prehospital hypothermia and in-hospital hypothermia were compared in 6 RCTs with 3393 patients. We observed no difference in mortality (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.05) or neurologic outcomes (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.92-1.72) between the hypothermia and normothermia strategies. Similarly, no difference was observed in mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03) or neurologic outcome (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85-1.08) between the prehospital hypothermia versus in-hospital hypothermia strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TTM with therapeutic hypothermia may not improve mortality or neurologic outcomes in postarrest survivors. Using therapeutic hypothermia as a standard of care strategy of postarrest care in survivors may need to be reevaluated.

Shock induced endotheliopathy (SHINE) in acute critical illness - a unifying pathophysiologic mechanism

One quarter of patients suffering from acute critical illness such as severe trauma, sepsis, myocardial infarction (MI) or post cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) develop severe hemostatic aberrations and coagulopathy, which are associated with excess mortality. Despite the different types of injurious “hit”, acutely critically ill patients share several phenotypic features that may be driven by the shock. This response, mounted by the body to various life-threatening conditions, is relatively homogenous and most likely evolutionarily adapted. We propose that shock-induced sympatho-adrenal hyperactivation is a critical driver of endothelial cell and glycocalyx damage (endotheliopathy) in acute critical illness, with the overall aim of ensuring organ perfusion through an injured microvasculature. We have investigated more than 3000 patients suffering from different types of acute critical illness (severe trauma, sepsis, MI and PCAS) and have found a potential unifying pathologic link between sympatho-adrenal hyperactivation, endotheliopathy, and poor outcome. We entitled this proposed disease entity, shock-induced endotheliopathy (SHINE). Here we review the literature and discuss the pathophysiology of SHINE.