ProSeal laryngeal mask airway as an alternative to standard endotracheal tube in securing upper airway in the patients undergoing beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting

Safety, Efficacy, and Ease of Insertion of Gnana Laryngeal Airway (GLA-4): A Prospective Clinical Study Utilizing the Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway With a Suction Tubing

INTRODUCTION

Utilizing laryngeal mask airways to maintain patients' airways is advantageous because it enables the anesthesiologist to keep the patient spontaneously inhaling and is less traumatic to the airway than intubation. Newer designs such as the Gnana laryngeal mask airway design permit real-time suctioning while the mask is on a patient.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of the efficacy of Gnana laryngeal airway 4 (GLA-4) in 50 patients undergoing colonoscopy. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were provided with propofol; GLA-4 was applied to secure the airway; and correct placement was verified.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the study (44% female, 56% male, mean age: 56.5 years, mean BMI: 33.3). Twelve patients were assigned American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 2, and 38 were assigned ASA class 3. The first attempt of GLA-4 insertion was successful in 47 patients, and two attempts were required for the successful placement of the GLA-4 in two patients. The successful placement was not achieved in one patient. The average time to successful insertion was 27.1 ± 3.9s. The average volume of oropharyngeal secretions suctioned through the suction catheter was 9.96 ± 2.31 mL. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in the 50 patients. There were no reports of sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia, or cough immediately postop.

CONCLUSION

GLA-4 can be inserted safely with adequate periglottic occlusion. This laryngeal mask is unique and desirable due to its ability to evacuate oropharyngeal secretions while in place to prevent laryngospasm. To establish the role of GLA-4 in broader clinical situations, additional clinical trials and studies are required.

The effects of on hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, peak airway pressure and adverse events during anesthesia for thyroid surgery: tracheal intubation Vs. ProSeal laryngeal mask airway

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of tracheal intubation and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) on hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, peak airway pressure and adverse events during anesthesia for thyroid surgery.

METHODS

65 patients who underwent luminal thyroid surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled as the study subjects, and were divided into control group (30 patients, tracheal intubation) and experimental group (35 patients, PLMA) using random number table. The time to establishment of artificial airway and success rate, hemodynamics, oxygen saturation, peak airway pressure and adverse effects were observed in the two groups.

RESULTS

The SBP, DBP, and HR levels of patients in the experimental group were significantly lower than those of control group (P < 0.05), and there were no significant changes in SBP, DBP, and HR levels during the insertion and removal of the laryngeal mask, and the patients were hemodynamically stable. SpO2 and Ppeak values remained stable at 5 min, 30 min, and 60 min after the start and the end of surgery in both groups, and showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). A surgical airway was quickly established in both groups, and the time to airway establishment was shorter in the experimental group than in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions during extubation was lower in the experimental group than in the control group, and the incidence of hoarseness, choking and cough differed significantly between the two groups (P < 0.05), and the adverse reactions in both groups were relieved or disappeared 24 h after the operation.

CONCLUSION

With LMPA, patients are more hemodynamically stable during insertion and removal of the mask, have a lower incidence of adverse events, and experience less throat irritation, with safety.

Fast Tracking in Off Pump CABG with Supraglottic Airway and TIVA

The standard goals of anesthetic management for an off pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery are that it should be safe, provide cardiac and other organ protection and stability, preserve neurocognitive integrity, maintain hemodynamics, allow early emergence and ambulation, and offer pain relief in the postoperative period. The cardiac surgical team should collaborate and plan the best preoperative strategy, so as to provide optimal care and a rapid and expeditious recovery of these patients. Scientific evidence and practical experience make total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) the recommended choice for cardiac surgery. Use of endotracheal tube (ETT) is associated with certain drawbacks which can be overcome with judicious use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) for cardiac surgeries too. The core principles of ultrafast track anesthetic (UFTA) technique are choice and titration of short-acting anesthetic drugs, postoperative normothermia, multimodal analgesia, early extubation, ambulation, and discharge. Fast tracking with use of TIVA and PLMA in patients undergoing OPCAB at our center offers certain advantages over other techniques in terms of reduced airway and lung trauma, improved cardiac output and renal perfusion with spontaneous respiration, decreased stress and discomfort of ETT suctioning and weaning from ventilation, substantially reduced requirement of dosages of analgesics, anesthetics and opioids, resulting in better patient hemodynamics, alert and pain-free patient that are more amenable and cooperative for early feeds, postoperative chest physiotherapy and lung recruitment strategies, and early ambulation and discharge.

Effect of Laryngeal Mask Air Way Insertion versus Endotracheal Intubation over Hemodynamic Responses in Pediatrics Patient Who Underwent Ophthalmic Surgery at Menelik II Hospital, Addis Ababa: A Prospective Observational Study Design

Background

The airway of an anesthetized child is usually maintained with an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway. However, both are related with some level of pressor response which may be risky in several groups of patient.

Methods

An institutional-based prospective observational study design was employed. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Data were entered into Epi info version 7 and transported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Normality of the data was checked using Shapiro-Wilk tests. An independent t test was used to determine the mean differences between the two groups while the paired sample t test was used to determine the mean differences within the groups. A p value of less than 0.05 was used as a cut-off point for the presence of association.

Results

The changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were returned to baseline values at five and three minutes in both groups, respectively. However, the changes in the heart rate and mean arterial pressure returned to baseline values in five minutes in the ETT group and three minutes in the LMA group. At baseline, the difference in systolic blood pressure between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.328).

Conclusions

A significant hemodynamic pressor response was observed after the insertion of both LMA and ETT groups. However, the LMA group has less hemodynamic change as compared to the ETT group. Therefore, the practice of LMA insertion was strongly recommended.

Effects of Lidocaine Oropharyngeal Spray Applied Before Endotracheal Intubation on QT Dispersion in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of lidocaine oropharyngeal spray applied before endotracheal intubation on hemodynamic responses and electrocardiographic parameters in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery were included in this prospective randomized controlled study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, the topical lidocaine group (administration of 10% lidocaine oropharyngeal spray, five minutes before laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation) and the control group. Both groups were compared with each other in terms of main hemodynamic parameters including mean arterial pressure and heart rate, as well as P and QT wave dispersion durations, before and after endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, and other demographics and basic clinical characteristics. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of QT dispersion durations after laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. The increase in QT dispersion duration was not statistically significant in the topical lidocaine group, whereas the increase in QT dispersion duration was statistically significant in the control group. When the groups were compared in terms of P wave dispersion durations, there were significant decreases in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that the topical lidocaine administration before endotracheal intubation prevented increase of QT dispersion duration in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03304431.

Comparative study of the Ambu® AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in anesthesia airway management during neurosurgery

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the Ambu® AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask (LMA) compared with endotracheal intubation (ETI) during supratentorial tumor resection in the right lateral decubitus position.

Methods

This was a randomized controlled trial of LMA compared with ETI in patients who were scheduled to undergo supratentorial tumor resection in the right lateral decubitus position. The patients were randomized to the LMA (n = 40) and ETI groups (n = 40). The hemodynamic parameters (primary outcome) and mechanical ventilation parameters, anesthetic dose, and complications as well as quality of anesthesia recovery (secondary outcomes) were compared.

Results

Patients in the LMA group exhibited lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) compared with ETI. Nine and two patients received esmolol during intubation and extubation, respectively. The airway pressure (AP) in the LMA group was higher compared with the ETI group 60 minutes after the start of surgery. Compared with the ETI group, the sufentanil dose was lower by 24% and the anesthesia recovery rate was better in the LMA group.

Conclusions

LMA can improve hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor resection in the right lateral decubitus position. If there is a clinical need and no contraindication, LMA could replace ETI.