Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of three resin based dual-cure core build-up materials: An In-vitro study

A Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Hybrid Tooth-Colored Restorative Materials to Dentin: An In-Vitro Study

INTRODUCTION

Silver amalgam, glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, compomers, light polymerized hybrid composite resin, and hybrid glass ionomer are among the most frequent restorative materials used as cavity-based or post-endodontics. Thus, to meet the needs of both patients and dentists, Cention N reimagines the traditional filling by integrating bulk placement, ion release, and durability into a dual-curing, aesthetically pleasing solution. Hoewver, we do not have enough information from studies comparing this hybrid restorative material's shear bond strengths to dentin to draw any firm conclusions. Cention N, zirconomer, and Vitremer are three hybrid tooth-colored restorative materials that were evaluated for their shear bond strength to dentin. This research aimed to compare and evaluate these materials.

METHODOLOGY

The purpose of this research was to use a universal Instron machine to measure the shear bond stress of three distinct hybrid tooth-colored restorative materials in relation to dentin. The research samples consisted of 45 extracted lower first premolars from humans. The teeth were then assigned into three groups of 15 samples each according to different color acrylic resin blocks, namely, group A (pink acrylic blocks), which had Cention in cement; group B (white acrylic blocks), which has zirconomer cement; and group C (violet acrylic blocks), which had Vitremer cement.

RESULTS

 There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups and the normal distribution, as shown by the negligible values in the tests involving the three groups. Put simply, each of the three categories exhibits data that follows a normal distribution. This allows for further data analysis to be conducted using the parametric test of significance.

CONCLUSION

The shear bond strength of hybrid glass ionomer restorative materials has to be further investigated in both laboratory and living organism settings.

Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials - An in vitro study

Aims

The study was aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive, diametral tensile, and flexural strengths of three different commercial resin based core materials and to single out the best resin-based core build-up material with respect to their physical properties among ParaCore® (Coltene Whaledent, USA), FlouroCore® 2+ (Dentsply International, USA), MultiCore® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with Miracle Mix® (GC America) core used as control.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and twenty samples were prepared, of which forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical stainless steel molds (height 6 mm, diameter 4 mm) for compressive strength measurements. Other forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in cylindrical molds (diameter 6 mm, height 2 mm) for diametral tensile strength measurements. Forty samples (10 of each material) were prepared in stainless steel molds cuboidal in shape (length 25 mm, thickness 2 mm, and width 2 mm) for flexural strength measurements. The samples were tested on a Universal testing machine (Instron Machine 3366, made in the USA).

Statistical Analysis Used

One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine any statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) among the resin-based core build-up materials with respect to their three respective strengths. Further, the statistical comparison was made among the four materials using Student's t-test at a significance level of 5%.

Results

Based on the results obtained it can be summarized that the ParaCore is the strongest material among all the four materials, followed by MultiCore, FlouroCore2+, and Miracle Mix. The Miracle mix is the weakest among all the materials owing to its inferior strength values.

Conclusion

The results of the present study imply that, in consideration of their superior strength values, resin-based core build-up materials, ParaCore, MultiCore, and FlouroCore2+ should be a preferred for use as core build-up material over Miracle Mix in specific clinical situations, in the same order of preference.

Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials

Background

To evaluate the microshear bond strength (μ-SBS) between resin-based cements and core build-up materials after water storage.

Material and Methods

Cylinders (1x1 mm) of conventional dual-cure resin cement (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE), universal dual-cure resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE) or self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE) were adhered to disks (6x2 mm) made with commercial core build-up materials (Bis-Core, Bisco or LuxaCore Z, DMG) or conventional nanocomposite resin (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE). The specimens (n=10) were submitted to μ-SBS test using a universal testing machine and fracture pattern analysis at 48 hours or after 9 months of water storage. The data were evaluated by three-way ANOVA for repeated measures and Tukey’s test (α=0.05).

Results

After 48 hours, regardless of the resin-based cement used, the μ-SBS to the conventional resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT) was greater compared to other materials. However, after 9 months, there was a statistically significant decrease in μ-SBS values between the conventional resin composite and evaluated luting agents. The μ-SBS values of core build-up commercial materials (Bis-Core and LuxaCore Z) did not change over time. Regardless of the composite used and storage time, there was no statistically significant difference between the resin-based cements. After 48 h, the most prevalent failure was mixed for all groups. However, after 9 months, the core build-up materials showed a predominantly mixed fracture pattern whereas the resin composite presented an adhesive pattern.

Conclusions

Commercial core build-up materials achieved stable bonding performance with resin-based cements over time.

Key words:Composite resins, resin cement, dental restoration failure.

Adhesive strength of bioactive resin for endodontic tooth build up to dentin treated with conventional and contemporary treatments

AIM

The aim of present ex-vivo study was to assess and evaluate the influence of alternative dentinal conditioning methods- Er,Cr:YSGG (ECL) and Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in comparison to traditional etching regimes- Self Etch Resin (SER) and total etch and rinse (TER) on the bond values of Bioactive restorative material (BA) and Multicore (MC) bulk filled resin composite restorations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty caries free mandibular molars were disinfected and embedded in acrylic resin up to Cemento enamel junction (CEJ). Buccal surfaces of all samples were grounded to depth of 2 mm. Specimens were divided into eight groups (n = 20) based on surface treatment received. Samples in group 1 and 2 conditioned with ECYL, group 3 and 4 pre-treated with methylene blue photosensitizer (MBP), group 5 and 6 surfaces conditioned with TER and samples in group 7 and 8 conditioned with SER. Dentin bonding agent was applied and samples of group 1, 3, 5 and 7 were bonded with BA and 2,4,6,8 bonded to MC. Samples were placed in universal testing machine for SBS testing. Data was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple comparisons test.

RESULTS

Specimens in group 6 treated with TER and bonded with MC demonstrated maximum SBS (19.61 ± 0.587 MPa). Whereas, group 3 dentin conditioned to MBP and bonded to BA displayed lowest bond values (12.01 ± 0.892 MPa). Samples in group 3 and group 4 dentin treated with MBP bonded to MC (13.68 ± 0.221 MPa) and BA (12.01 ± 0.892 MPa) displayed comparable bond integrity (p > 0.05) CONCLUSION: Dentin pre-treated with TER still remains the gold standard. ECYL as an alternative approach to condition dentin has shown potential and can be recommended in clinical settings. MC as bulk fill composite is recommended over BA irrespective of dentine conditioning technique. MBP as dentin conditioner needs further investigation.

Effect of Two Different Surface Treatments on Retention of Cosmopost with Two Different Core Materials

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of Cosmopost's two different surface treatments (sandblasting and silica coating) on persistence to various core materials using push-out test set-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 30 Cosmoposts was used in this study. Cosmoposts were divided into three groups (10 samples each) according to the post-surface treatment received. Every category was additionally subdivided into two subgroups according to the type of core material (n = 5 samples). A specially designed copper mold was used for construction of different core materials with standardized dimensions around the posts, in such a way to ensure that the posts will be centralized. Surface roughness was estimated for all Cosmoposts, following different surface treatments using SEM. Cylindrical cores were fabricated of either composite resin or heat-pressed zirconia-containing glass-ceramic (IPS Empress Cosmo, Ivoclar Vivadent). Following the construction of different Core materials, samples were subjected to push-out test set-up to Evaluate the impact of various treatments on post/core bond strength. Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed. SEM was performed on Cosmoposts following debonding of different post/core samples to determine their mode of failure.

RESULTS

Results of push-out bond strength revealed that core material, surface treatment and the interaction between the two variables using Two-way ANOVA had a statistically significant effect on mean push-out bond strength. Regarding the effect of type of core material on Push-out bond strength, results showed that IPS Empress Cores showed statistically significant higher mean push-out bond strength to Cosmopost (36.4±9.7MPa) than composite cores (15.8±2.5 MPa).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, direct heat-pressed ceramic core was more beneficial for zirconia post buildups, than Composite Cores, since they provided higher bond strength. Thanks to a double improvement: increase in fracture resistance and retentive capacity to post. Also, Tribochemical Silicacoating technique was proved to be more effective in Cosmopost treatments than sandblasting technique.

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Esthetic Restorative Composite Materials: An In Vitro Study

Introduction

Dental caries remains to be one of the most prevalent diseases encountered in the field of dentistry. Several restorative materials have been introduced with variable properties and among them, composite restorative materials are most widely used nowadays because of their superior esthetic property as well as minimal hard tissue removal. Shear bond strength of a restorative material plays a key role in deciding the restoration’s longevity. Hence, for a better selection of the composite material, shear bond strength needs to be evaluated.

Aim

The study aim was to analyze the shear bond strength of three commercially available esthetic restorative composite materials—Dentsply Ceram X, 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT, and GC Solare Sculpt to the tooth surface.

Materials and methods

Thirty extracted human mandibular permanent molars that were caries-free were selected and erected in acrylic blocks. The uniform dentinal surface was exposed by cutting with a diamond disk. These were then randomly divided into three groups—groups I, II, and III based on the restorative material which was used, i.e., Ceram X, 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT, and Solare Sculpt, respectively. The restorative materials were applied on the dentinal surface of the prepared tooth specimens with the help of plastic molds, followed up by storing them in distilled water until they were subjected to shear bond strength testing. The collected data were examined by applying a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Turkey’s post hoc test.

Results

The Ceram X (21.6155 ± 2.20717) and Solare Sculpt (19.8747 ± 3.99732) were comparable in terms of shear bond strength values; however, they depicted significantly higher bond strength compared to 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT (12.8068 ± 3.99732).

Conclusion

Among the three materials compared in this study, Ceram X produced higher shear bond strength to tooth surface when compared to Solare Sculpt and 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT.

Clinical significance

Restoration failure continues to be a major problem taking a toll on the dentists’ time and patient satisfaction. Thus, the demand for restorative materials with better shear bond strength as well as excellent esthetics is on the rise. Thus, this particular study compares the shear bond strength of three commercial esthetic nanocomposites.

How to cite this article

Preethy NA, Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, et al. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Esthetic Restorative Composite Materials : An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(6):635–639.