Disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

Comparative treatment effectiveness of oral fingolimod and conventional injectable disease-modifying agents in multiple sclerosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of oral fingolimod and conventional injectable disease-modifying agents (DMAs) using the composite endpoint of relapse or DMA treatment switch in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

DESIGN

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

DATA SOURCE

IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database from 2010-2012.

PATIENTS

Adults (≥18 years) with MS diagnosis (ICD-9-CM:340) who newly initiated DMAs.

INTERVENTION

Oral fingolimod and conventional injectable DMAs (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate).

MEASUREMENTS

Composite endpoint of time to relapse or DMA treatment switch.

MAIN RESULTS

The incident study cohort consisted of 1997 MS patients who initiated oral fingolimod (15.6%) or injectable (84.4%) DMAs. The proportion of patients who had a composite endpoint (relapse/DMA treatment switch) in oral fingolimod and injectable DMA users was found to be 16.72% and 27.16%, respectively. The Cox PH regression model with stabilized IPTW revealed that fingolimod is equally effective as conventional injectable DMAs in reducing the risk of experiencing the composite endpoint of relapse or DMA switch (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.43-1.03). Additional analysis among patients who were adherent also found no significant difference in the composite endpoint (aHR: 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-1.15) between oral fingolimod and injectable DMA users.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral fingolimod has similar effectiveness as conventional injectable DMAs in reducing the risk of experiencing the composite endpoint (relapse or DMA treatment switch). In addition, when assessed independently, oral fingolimod showed no difference in reducing the time to relapse or DMA treatment switch compared to injectable DMAs.

Medication use in a large international sample of people with multiple sclerosis: associations with quality of life, relapse rate and disability

OBJECTIVES

To examine associations between medication use and health-related quality of life (HRQOL), relapse rate and disability in an international cohort of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

METHODS

Using Web 2.0 platforms, the authors recruited PwMS who completed survey items on demographics, medication use, HRQOL, relapse rate and disability.

RESULTS

Of 2276 respondents from 56 countries, approximately half were taking a disease-modifying drug (DMD), most commonly glatiramer acetate or an interferon. Use of DMDs was not consistently associated with HRQOL. Individually, glatiramer acetate was associated with better HRQOL when compared with other DMDs or no DMD use. Overall, DMD use was neither associated with disability nor lower relapse rate, although those taking a DMD >12 months had 23.9% fewer relapses than those not taking a DMD. Polypharmacy, defined as those taking five or more over the counter, prescription or herbal medications, irrespective of DMD use, was associated with markedly worse HRQOL across all domains.

DISCUSSION

There was no consistent association of DMD use with better health outcomes in this large international \sample of PwMS, although relapse rate appears lower for those taking a DMD for >12 months. Glatiramer acetate had associations with better HRQOL compared with other DMDs.

Exacerbation history is associated with medication and appointment adherence in MS

Disease-modifying treatments are designed to prevent exacerbations in multiple sclerosis (MS). To date, few studies have examined the relationship between disease activity and treatment adherence in MS. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between disease activity (e.g., annualized relapse rates), medication adherence, and appointment adherence in relapsing-remitting MS. Retrospective exacerbation and appointment data were collected and used to predict prospective medication adherence. Results indicated that patients with higher annualized relapse rates missed fewer doses of medication and were less likely to miss appointments. Conversely, patients with relatively stable disease were more likely to demonstrate poor medication adherence and poor appointment adherence. Patients who missed more appointments also missed more doses of their disease modifying medication. Future studies may wish to examine clinical methods designed to improve immunotherapy adherence among patients who are in relatively symptom-free stages of relapsing-remitting MS.

Therapies for multiple sclerosis: considerations in the pediatric patient

Current and emerging therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) offer promise for improved disease control and long-term clinical outcome. To date, these therapies have been evaluated solely in the context of adult MS. However, onset of MS in children is being increasingly recognized, and recent studies have identified a significant impact of MS onset during childhood on cognitive and physical functioning. Optimization of pediatric MS care requires that promising new therapies be made available to children and adolescents, but also that safety and tolerability and potential influence of therapies on the developing immune and neural networks of pediatric patients be closely considered. We propose care algorithms illustrating models for therapy that detail careful monitoring of pediatric patients with MS, provide definitions for inadequate treatment response and treatment escalation, and foster multinational collaboration in future therapeutic trials.

New approaches in the management of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system chronic inflammatory disease that is characterized by an extensive and complex immune response. Scientific advances have occurred in immunology, pathophysiology, and diagnostic and clinical assessment tools, and recent discovery of unique therapeutic targets has spurred numerous Phase II and Phase III clinical trials. Reductions in MS relapse rates and improvements in T₂ or gadolinium-enhancing lesion burdens have been reported from Phase III trials that include fingolimod, alemtuzumab, cladribine, and rituximab. Promising Phase II trial data exist for teriflunomide, daclizumab, laquinimod, and fumarate. The optimism created by these favorable findings must be tempered with evaluation of the adverse effect profile produced by these new agents. Given the discovery of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy with the use of natalizumab, ongoing vigilance for rare and life-threatening reactions due to new agents should be paramount. Patients with MS often experience difficulty with ambulation, spasticity, and cognition. Recent clinical trial data from two Phase III dalfampridine-SR trials indicate certain patients receive benefits in ambulation. This article provides an overview of data from clinical trials of newer agents of potential benefit in MS.