The outcome of surgical fixation of mid shaft clavicle fractures; looking at patient satisfaction and comparing surgical approaches

Surgical approach for open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fractures: a comparison of vertical and horizontal incisions

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the results of clavicle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with standard horizontal incision versus vertical incision.

METHODS

ORIF surgery performed between October 2012 and August 2016 was included. The surgical approach was chosen according to surgeon preference as vertical or horizontal. Functional outcomes, fracture union, complications, scar appearance, skin irritation, and denervation around the scar were assessed at a minimum follow-up of three months.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients, age 39 ± 12 years, were operated upon, 22 through vertical incisions and 16 through horizontal incisions. There were no significant group differences in functional scores, fracture union, or complications. Two patients in the vertical incision group had a post-operative haematoma. The scar length was significantly shorter when a vertical incision was used (6.75 ± 1.25 cm vs 8.9 ± 2.3 cm, P = 0.001). The typical distribution of hypoesthetic skin area distal and lateral to the scar represented iatrogenic damage to the supraclavicular nerves and was found in 66% of patients. The mean hypoesthetic surface area was smaller in the vertical incision group (38 ± 29 cm² vs 48 ± 28 cm², P = non-significant).

CONCLUSION

Vertical incision results in shorter scars but may be associated with increased incidence of haematomas. Meticulous closure of the subcutaneous tissue is recommended.

Surgical Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Precontoured Plates Versus Noncontoured Plates

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes and complications of open reduction and internal fixation using precontoured versus noncontoured plates for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

Open reduction and internal fixation using was performed on 130 patients with a midshaft clavicle fracture. Precontoured plates were used in 69 cases (group A) and noncontoured plates in 61 cases (group B).

RESULTS

The average follow-up in both groups was approximately 21 months. There was a significant difference between the 2 groups in mean surgery duration and blood loss, although Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Constant-Murley Shoulder scores at final follow-up were similar. Plate removal was required in 44.9% (31 of 69) of the precontoured group and 65.6% (40 of 61) of the noncontoured group. The indication was prominence of the hardware in 27.5% (19 of 69) of the precontoured group and 54.1% (33 of 61) of the noncontoured. In both groups, body mass index was lower in patients requiring implant removal because of hardware prominence. A higher proportion of females in both groups required implant removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Precontoured plates are associated with a lower rate of hardware removal. Body mass index and gender may be factors that influence the rate of hardware removal.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Plate fixation versus intramedullary fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures: Meta-analysis of complications and functional outcomes

Objective

This analysis critically compares publications discussing complications and functional outcomes of plate fixation (PF) versus intramedullary fixation (IF) for midshaft clavicle fractures.

Methods

Relevant studies published between January 1990 and October 2014, without language restrictions, were identified in database searches of PubMed®, Medline®, Embase and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Studies that compared postoperative complications and functional outcomes between PF and IF for midshaft clavicle fractures, and provided sufficient data for analysis, were included in this meta-analysis.

Results

After strict evaluation, 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Studies encompassed 462 participants in the PF group and 440 in the IF group. Study participants were followed up for ≥1 year. Outcomes were superior with IF compared with PF in terms of shoulder constant score at 6-month follow-up, fewer symptomatic hardware complications, lower rate of refracture after hardware removal and less hypertrophic scarring. In other aspects, such as functional recovery at 12-months and 24-months, Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire results at 12-month follow-up, shoulder motion range, rates of superficial infection, temporary brachial plexus lesion, nonunion, malunion, delayed union, implant failure and need for major revision, both techniques were similar.

Conclusions

Findings of this meta-analysis suggest that, in many respects, IF was superior to PF for the management of midshaft clavicle fractures. This finding could aid surgeons in making decisions on the optimum internal fixation pattern for midshaft clavicular fractures.

Surgical treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized trial in a working compensation population

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures resulted in shorter complete return to work periods with earlier consolidation documented on computed tomography (CT) scans in this prospective, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The study randomized 76 consecutive patients with displaced fractures (2B1-2B2 according to Robinson) to conservative (C, n = 42) and surgical (S, n = 34) treatment with plates and screws. Bone union was documented with CT scans at 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Risk factors known to increase the risk of nonunion were similar between groups. Time until discharge for complete return to work was 3.7 ± 1.1 months for C and 2.9 ± 0.8 months for S (P = .003). On the CT scan at 6 weeks, 24.1% of the patients presented advanced bone union in S vs 5.3% in C (P = .05). At 12 weeks, 81% of the patients presented advanced bone union in S vs 16.7% in C (P = .005). At final follow-up, 4 nonunions were present in the C group that required surgery; in the S group, 4 patients underwent revision surgery for plate removal. At 6 and 12 months of follow-up, Constant scores were higher for the S group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment with ORIF of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures achieved good and excellent functional results, shorter time to complete return to work, earlier bone union, and fewer cases of nonunions in a working population under injury compensation.

Complications of operative treatment of clavicle fractures in a Level I Trauma Center

Traditionally, the belief is that the clavicle heals readily and with nonoperative treatment. Since evidence suggests that many clavicles benefit from operative care, the aim of this study was to find the incidence of complications after operative treatment of clavicle fractures. This retrospective study includes 56 patients (41 male and 15 female) who were treated operatively for clavicle fractures between 2010 and 2012. The indications were displacement more than 20 mm, comminution, tenting of the skin, floating shoulder, and open fractures. Seventy-five percent of the fractures occurred in the midshaft and 25 % in the lateral third of the clavicle. There were no fractures of the medial third. The midshaft fractures were either plated with 3.5 mm reconstruction plates or anatomical locking plates. For internal fixation of the lateral fractures, we used acromioclavicular hook plates. The mean follow-up period was 4.6 months (range 1.0-28.0). Three patients did not participate in the follow-up. There were 12 patients with complications (21 %). Five of them required reoperations. Two patients were reoperated due to clavicle nonunions, two patients due to traumatic refracture of the plated clavicle, and one because of pain caused by the plate. Four cases developed superficial infections, and there was one patient with a deep tissue infection. None of the patients showed signs of neurovascular impairment postoperatively. None of the patients complained about decreased range of motion or loss of muscle strength postoperatively. Plating of clavicle fractures is a procedure that results in lower rates of malunion, nonunion, and functional impairment compared with nonoperative treatment. Nonetheless, one case in ten has a complicated course. Attention to technique and careful follow-up may prevent these problems.