Adverse events associated with apheresis procedures: Incidence and relative frequency

Therapeutic apheresis in kidney transplantation: Emerging trends

INTRODUCTION

The use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) either as stand-alone or adjunctive treatment in kidney transplantation has increased over the years to become a leading indication. This study shows recent trends in indications for TA related to kidney transplantation, adverse events, and patient outcome in this cohort.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort review of adults who received TA for kidney transplant-related indications from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, at the University of Virginia Medical Centre, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Data extracted include basic demographics, indication for apheresis, number of procedures, procedure characteristics, procedure-related adverse events (complications), and serum ionized calcium and serum creatinine. Data were analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 2022 IBM Inc).

RESULTS

Data from a total of 131 patients who received 860 TA procedures were analyzed. Indications for TA were antibody-mediated rejection (65.5%), recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (15%), thrombotic microangiopathy (5%), desensitization for ABO incompatibility (4.5%) and for HLA-incompatibility (4.5%), and recurrent IgA nephropathy (1%). Some adverse events were encountered in 16.7% of the procedures and include hypocalcemia (7%), vascular access malfunction (0.7%), hypotension (1.2%), arrhythmia (0.6%), and depletion coagulopathy (0.6%). The overall case mortality rate was 8.4% over the 6-year period. There was one death recorded on machine during TA resulting in a procedure-mortality rate of 0.12%.

CONCLUSION

Antibody-mediated rejection was the most common indication for TA related to kidney transplantation. Adverse events were minor and patient survival over the time was within usual limits.

Leukostasis With Isolated Central Nervous System Involvement in Chronic Phase of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a hematologic malignancy with unique significance to the field of hematology and oncology, specifically due to the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). CML often presents with nonspecific symptoms, and the quality of life in patients with CML has drastically improved as a result of TKIs. However, complications of CML including the risk of transforming into life-threatening blast crises continue to exist. Further, as most patients are asymptomatic in the chronic phase, patients often present with serious complications associated with noncompliance to TKIs. For example, central nervous system (CNS) manifestations of CML have been reported, both as the initial presentation of undiagnosed CML and as known complication of uncontrolled CML. Hyperleukocytosis is a manifestation of uncontrolled CML and leukostasis is a complication, occurring in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we present a rare case of leukostasis in a patient with known CML presenting on computed tomography (CT) as intracranial masses in the chronic phase. Our goal is to discuss this rare case of leukostasis in adult CML and describe its management.

A Vexing Problem of Air Trapping in the Trima Accel During Plateletpheresis Procedure: Reflecting Our Experience in Troubleshooting

Troubleshooting for any fault of apheresis equipment or kit is hardly addressed. Here, we report a unique problem of air trapping in a kit at two different positions leading to failure of the plateletpheresis procedure. Two plateletpheresis procedures were aborted due to "Access pressure low", though the needle position was absolutely perfect. In the third event, platelet yield was not increasing even after 30 minutes from the time of initiation. It was completed after stopping the centrifuge pump which could have displaced the air bubble from the collection port. The root cause for these events was analyzed in consultation with the apheresis technical expert and "air block" was found to be the cause. Air block can also result in a "low access pressure" alarm despite improper phlebotomy being the common cause. Perfect kit loading, checking of tubing defects prior to loading, and comparative analysis of troubleshooting to have adequate knowledge are essential tools for the smooth functioning of apheresis.

Improved platform for breast cancer circulating tumor cell enrichment and characterization with next-generation sequencing technology

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represent cells shed from the primary tumor or metastatic sites and can be used to monitor treatment response and tumor recurrence. However, CTCs circulate in extremely low numbers making in-depth analysis beyond simple enumeration challenging when collected from peripheral blood. Furthermore, tumor heterogeneity, a hallmark of many tumors, especially breast cancer, further complicates CTC characterization. To overcome this limitation, we developed a platform based on the large-scale isolation of CTCs by apheresis, allowing us to collect CTCs in large numbers, which were preserved live in liquid nitrogen for further characterization. Flow cytometry followed by cell sorting (FACS) was performed using a combination of antibodies directed against cell surface markers of white blood cells (CD45) and epithelial tumor cells (CK8). Analysis of subpopulations CD45+/- and CK8+/- by bulk RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and the CD45-/CK8 positive population by single-cell RNAseq was performed. The CD45- population was enriched using CD45 magnetic beads separation and examined by IHC for pan-cytokeratin and immunofluorescence (IF) for specific markers, including the elusive circulating cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSC-rich mammospheres were grown in vitro for further analysis and treated to examine their response to chemotherapeutic agents. Finally, mammospheres were transplanted into the mammary fat pad and bone of immunodeficient mice to examine tumor growth in vivo. This platform enables the detection and collection of CTCs in early and late-stage breast cancer patients of every subtype. Markers including CD44/24, ALDH1 and CXCR4 were identified by IF and showed high expression following mammosphere culture, which responded predictably to chemotherapeutic agents. Mammospheres were also transplanted into nude mice and induced tumors in the mammary fat pad and bone following intra-tibial transplantation. Finally, bulk RNA analysis of the FACS isolated CD45+/- and CK8+/- cells showed a clear separation of CD45- away from CD45+ populations. Single-cell RNAseq of the FACS isolated CD45-/CK8+ cells showed the presence of 4-5 clusters, confirming the high degree of heterogeneity of CTCs. Our platform for large-scale isolation of CTCs using apheresis is suitable for an in-depth analysis of the cancer phenotype and may eventually allow evaluation in real-time of the disease process to optimize cancer regimens.

Effect of double dose plateletpheresis on target yield and donor platelet recovery

INTRODUCTION

The demand for apheresis platelets has increased in the recent past and the shrinking donor pool has shifted the trend to collection of double-dose or higher yield of platelets.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to determine the effect of double-dose plateletpheresis on the target yield and donor platelet recovery.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 100 healthy plateletpheresis donors, 50 of whom were in the study group, which underwent double-dose plateletpheresis (DDP), and 50 of whom were in the control group for single-donor plateletpheresis. Pre- and post-procedure samples of donors were subjected to a complete blood count. The DDP product was sampled for platelet yield and then split into two parts. Platelet yield, collection efficiency, collection rate, recruitment factor and donor platelet loss were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean platelet yield in the SDP was 4.09 ± 1.15 × 10¹¹ and in the DDP, 5.93 ± 1.04 × 10¹¹. There was a significant correlation between the pre-donation platelet count and platelet yield. The total of platelets processed for the SDP were 5.42 ± 1.08 × 10¹¹ and for the DDP, 7.94 ± 0.77 × 10¹¹. The collection efficiency was 71.93 ± 25.14% in the SDP and 72.94 ± 16.28% in the DDP, while the collection rates were 0.78 × 10¹¹ and 0.94 × 10¹¹ per minute, respectively. The average recruitment factor observed was 0.98 in the SDP, while it was 0.99 in the DDP. The mean platelet loss observed in the SDP was 35.55 ± 8.53% and in the DDP, 37.76 ± 8.65%.

CONCLUSION

The double-dose plateletpheresis supplements the platelet inventory in developing countries where the apheresis donor pool is limited. It is prudent to ensure stringent donor selection criteria for donors donating high-yield platelet products, thus enhancing donor safety and retention.

Leukapheresis guidance and best practices for optimal chimeric antigen receptor T-cell manufacturing

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an individualized immunotherapy that genetically reprograms a patient's T cells to target and eliminate cancer cells. Tisagenlecleucel is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Manufacturing CAR T cells is an intricate process that begins with leukapheresis to obtain T cells from the patient's peripheral blood. An optimal leukapheresis product is essential to the success of CAR T-cell therapy; therefore, understanding factors that may affect the quality or T-cell content is imperative. CAR T-cell therapy requires detailed organization throughout the entire multistep process, including appropriate training of a multidisciplinary team in leukapheresis collection, cell processing, timing and coordination with manufacturing and administration to achieve suitable patient care. Consideration of logistical parameters, including leukapheresis timing, location and patient availability, when clinically evaluating the patient and the trajectory of their disease progression must be reflected in the overall collection strategy. Challenges of obtaining optimal leukapheresis product for CAR T-cell manufacturing include vascular access for smaller patients, achieving sufficient T-cell yield, eliminating contaminating cell types in the leukapheresis product, determining appropriate washout periods for medication and managing adverse events at collection. In this review, the authors provide recommendations on navigating CAR T-cell therapy and leukapheresis based on experience and data from tisagenlecleucel manufacturing in clinical trials and the real-world setting.

MEdical Database AnaLysIS of Japanese multiple myeloma patienTs with apheresis #2 (MEDALIST-2): the impact of plerixafor use on costs and healthcare resources during mobilization and stem cell transplantation

Treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) can involve apheresis to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for later autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which can become costly over time. This retrospective claims database study examined healthcare resource use and medical costs associated with plerixafor, a selective CXCR4 inhibitor that mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells and minimizes apheresis times. Medical data were sampled from Japanese MM patients between April 2017 and September 2019, after the Japanese launch of plerixafor. The study population (190 plerixafor users and 180 non-users) was identified from the Medical Data Vision database, and further stratified into those using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in monotherapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide to trigger apheresis. A descriptive comparison of patient characteristics, healthcare resource use, and medical costs across the mobilization and ASCT phases indicated plerixafor is associated with higher average total medical costs. However, plerixafor-treated patients received fewer concomitant medications and spent less time in apheresis than non-users. A comparison of non-users with a similar analysis conducted pre-plerixafor launch (2013-2017) showed general improvements to treatment independent of plerixafor. The results of this research can inform guidelines for the role of plerixafor in balancing cost-effectiveness and drug efficacy in MM treatment.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: For Cancer Patients

Therapeutic plasma exchange is used as a trial method for the treatment of cancer patients. Therapeutic plasma exchange uses in vitro technology to remove pathogenic factors in the plasma, returning the replacement and remaining components to the patient to facilitate cure. In the effort to explore new methods of cancer treatment, the introduction of therapeutic plasma exchange brings new hope for cancer treatment; however, the current evidence supporting therapeutic plasma exchange is controversial, and most of the evidence comes from observational studies, lacking large prospective randomized trials. Therefore, this review attempts to focus on the main indications of therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of tumors and their complications, including hematological tumors (multiple myeloma cast nephropathy and hyperviscosity syndrome), nervous system tumors (myasthenia gravis associated with thymoma, paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, Lambert–Eaton myasthenia syndrome, and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis), overdose of chemotherapy drugs. In addition, the issues of side-effects and safety in the use of therapeutic plasma exchange are also discussed. However, well-designed prospective trials are needed to better define the role of therapeutic plasma exchange in cancer.

Evaluation of efficacy of Valsalva for attenuating needle puncture pain in first time nonremunerated voluntary plateletpheresis donors: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND:

Plateletpheresis is generally safe but may have adverse reactions. Adverse reactions can negatively influence donor recruitment and retention. Valsalva is a proven method of attenuating pain caused by venipuncture.

AIMS:

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the Valsalva maneuver on the attenuation of needle pain and donor anxiety.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN:

This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2015 and April 2016 at the Department of Transfusion Medicine.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

One-hundred and sixty consecutive donors were grouped into control group (C) and Valsalva group (V) each of sample size 80. The Valsalva group performed a Valsalva maneuver and control did nothing before the venipuncture. Anxiety and pain were scored using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). Severity was graded as VAS = 0 defines no pain and anxiety, VAS = 1–3 as mild pain and anxiety, VAS = 4–6 as moderate pain and anxiety, VAS = 7–9 as severe pain and anxiety, whereas VAS = 10 denotes extreme pain and anxiety.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 23 was used for analysis. Independent samples t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare between treatment and control group, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the difference between pre- and postobservations.

RESULTS:

In the Valsalva group, post-Valsalva anxiety levels were significantly reduced to (1 [0–2]) from their pre-Valsalva values of (2 [0–3]); (P < 0.001). Pain was significantly lower (2[1-2]) in Valsalva group compared to control (4[2–5]); (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Valsalva reduced both severity of venipuncture pain and anxiety. Valsalva can be performed by donors as it is an easy, painless, and nonpharmacological method of pain and anxiety attenuation.

Alteration in biochemical parameters during plateletpheresis in healthy donors: A compendious analysis

OBJECTIVES

During plateletpheresis, citrate induces hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia, which are usually transient and self-limiting, but they can lead to significant donor discomfort. The aim of study was to determine the effect of citrate infusion on a multitude of biochemical parameters during plateletpheresis in healthy donors and to correlate changes with adverse donor reactions.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 60 healthy plateletpheresis donors. Blood samples were drawn on three occasions, a baseline pre-donation sample, 30min at start of procedure and 30min post procedure. Heparinized samples were taken to measure ionized calcium and plain samples to measure serum calcium, serum magnesium, parathyroid hormone, total protein and serum albumin.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant decline in mean total calcium (9.27±0.66mg/dl to 8.72±0.87mg/dl) and ionized calcium (3.8±0.51mg/dl to 2.9±0.67mg/dl) from baseline until 30min after the start of procedure respectively. A significant fall in serum magnesium, total protein and serum albumin was observed. The mean parathyroid hormone showed significant increase from baseline levels till at the completion of procedure (19.94±12.1pg/ml to 92.08±36.78pg/ml). If the yield was set constant, there was negative correlation between ACD used and pre-donation platelet count. Majority of adverse donor reactions were hypocalcemic reactions, which were more with Amicus double yield plateletpheresis and were managed with calcium supplementation.

CONCLUSION

Plateletpheresis induces marked reduction in serum calcium and magnesium levels. Moreover, increase in parathyroid hormone levels was significant. In addition, decline in total protein and serum albumin may be a concern in donors also participating in plasmapheresis.

Adverse events associated with donor plateletpheresis: 10 years’ experience from Vojvodina, Serbia

Background/Aim. Plateletpheresis is a medical procedure used for the collection of donor platelets with multiple benefits for patients who will receive apheresis platelets. The procedure takes one hour and is well tolerated by donors. Nevertheless, adverse events may occur during and after the plateletpheresis procedure. The aim was to present one centre experiences in order to determine the incidence and type of adverse events associated with donor plateletpheresis. Methods. A retrospective analysis of adverse events associated with donor plateletpheresis was conducted in the Blood Transfusion Institute of Vojvodina over the period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2019. Results. Out of 2073 platelet donors 94.84% were multiple blood donors, predominantly male (98.55%). Adverse events were identified during 180 (8.68%) platelet donations with no statistical significance in occurrence in the first time (10.28%) and repeat donors (8.59%). Mild local reactions related to venous access (42.22%) were the most common adverse events. Generalized symptoms exhibited 16.67% of donors, 26.11% exhibited symptoms related to apheresis - citrate reactions and 15% exhibited those related to other complications. During plateletpheresis occurred 95.55% adverse events and 4.45% after. Conclusion. Donor plateletpheresis is a generally safe procedure, well tolerated by donors. Understanding risk factors for possible occurrence of adverse events provide support for adoption of measures to prevent them.

Plateletpheresis in the Era of Automation: Optimizing Donor Safety and Product Quality Using Modern Apheresis Instruments

The increases in major surgeries, transplantations and speciality clinics have significantly increased the utilization of platelet concentrates including single donor platelets (SDP). The advantages of SDP or apheresis platelet have been discussed elaborately by previous authors as compared to random donor platelets. Here we share our experiences of plateletpheresis procedures using the modern apheresis machines with regards to product quality and donor safety. This study included 3016 procedures of plateletpheresis (1397 on Amicus and 1619 on Trima accel cell separators) on eligible donors using recommended apheresis kits. A target yield of 3 × 1011 was set as the end point of each procedure. Donor details, procedure details and donor adverse reactions if any were documented. Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS statistical package (version 13, USA). Of the total 6276 donors screened 2049 (32.6%) were deferred due to various reasons. Out of remaining 4227 eligible donors; 3016 (71.4%) underwent plateletphereis procedures based on the requirement of SDP by the patients. Mean pre-procedure platelet count and hematocrit in donors were 188.3 × 106/mL and 41.7% respectively. Mean procedure time in Amicus (76.6 min) was significantly more than the Trima accel (64.3 min) (p = 0.02). Platelet yield by Trima accel and Amicus was 2.96 × 1011 and 3.08 × 1011 respectively (p = 0.061). A total of 40 donors (1.33%) suffered adverse effect during or after apheresis procedures. While the modern plateletpheresis devices are both donor and user friendly at the same time they provide quality product consistently in lesser time.

Incidence and severity of adverse events among platelet donors: A three-year retrospective study

Adverse events (AEs) are unfortunate consequences of platelet donation. This study reports the incidence and severity of AEs and the associated risk factors in platelet donation at a major blood donation center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.A review of donation records was conducted between 2014 and 2017. Eligible study participants were 5007 platelet donors who had donated 7969 times. Each donation was accounted for as a single study subject. Participants' characteristics were described and analyzed as potential contributing factors to adverse events.The average age of platelet donors was 30.0±7.3 years. First-time donors comprised (n = 3,100, 61.9%) of the sample, and 1907 (38.1%) were multiple donors (periodic/routine). Their average BMI was 28.6 ± 4.9 kg/m2. Most donors have blood type "O" and Rheo "positive". The range of blood volume processed was 0 to 5273 ml, while the procedure duration ranged from 0 to 90 minutes. The average platelet yield was 3.8 ± 3.5 ∗1011 platelets per unit, and the average collected volume was 257.6 ± 86.1 ml. Incidence of AEs was 4.2%, of which 91.3% were mild and 8.7% were severe. AEs were vascular injuries (65.3%), vasovagal reactions (11.6%), and citrate toxicity (5.3%). AEs were associated with first-time donation, adj.OR (95%CI) = 1.5 (1.1-1.8) and lower BMI, adj. OR (95% CI) = 1.4 (1.1-1.8). Citrate toxicity was present in severe forms, unlike vascular injuries and vasovagal reactions that tended to be milder. Donors with hemoglobin levels above 16 g/dl, adj. OR (95% CI) = 1.3 (1.1-1.7) and platelet levels below 250,000, adj. OR (95% CI) = 1.3 (1.1-1.6) were more likely to contract AEs than others.Reporting adverse events is essential to establish a benchmark for the annual incidence rates to be compared against local and international figures. Blood donor centers should also take notice of blood donors characteristics that are associated with higher incidence and more severe forms of AEs during or after platelet donation.

Medical database analysis of japanese multiple myeloma patients with planned stem cell transplantation (MEDALIST) - a focus on healthcare resource utilization and cost

This study explored the burden associated with stem cell mobilization, with or without cyclophosphamide (CPA), in patients who intended to receive autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). A Japanese health care claims database (MDV) was used to analyze the health care resource utilization patterns and medical cost between 2013 and 2016 (pre-plerixafor launch). The patients were further categorized into groups who received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or G-CSF + CPA group and analyzed in both mobilization and ASCT phases of treatment. Overall, there were more MM patients who were treated with G-CSF + CPA combination therapy than G-CSF alone. Length-of-stay was 1.6 times longer in the combination group during the mobilization phase. A reverse trend was observed during the ASCT phase. Direct cost was approximately 1.2 million yen during the mobilization phase and 2.3 million yen during the ASCT phase, with hospitalization basic fee accounting for the highest proportion in both groups and phases. A substantial amount of healthcare resource and cost was consumed in both phases. This study may serve as a basic reference for further health technology assessment of new medicines such as plerixafor. Further investigation of differences between treatment groups is warranted.

The role of plasma exchange in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Plasma exchange (PLEX) in addition to standard immunosuppressive treatment in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AVV) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of PLEX on AVV outcomes.

METHODS

Literature search was performed using Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov databases, and Google Scholar. The statistical meta-analysis and leave-one-out analysis were conducted using the Review Manager 5.3 and Open Meta-Analyst software, respectively.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis comprising 1235 patients; 633 received conventional treatment and 602 were treated with PLEX in conjunction with induction therapy. PLEX was not associated with lower rates of either mortality at 3 (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.19-3.25) and 12 months (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.40-1.34) or ESRD at 3 (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.30-2.42) and 12 months (RR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.53-3.25). Similarly, no differences were captured concerning disease relapses (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.62-1.36), the incidence of infections (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.63-1.76), and severe adverse effects (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.59-1.81). Time-to-event analysis revealed lower incidence of ESRD (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55-0.92) among patients who received PLEX, while the overall mortality was similar (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72-1.29) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis does not support the wide use of PLEX for the management of AAV in routine clinical practice. Future well-designed randomized controlled trials focusing on specific disease-related manifestations are necessary to reach firm conclusions about the potential efficacy of PLEX. Key Points • PLEX is not widely recommended for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis. • PLEX performance may reduce the overall incidence of ESRD in severe ANCA-associated vasculitis. • Well-designed randomized controlled trials focusing on specific disease-related manifestations are necessary to reach firm conclusions about the potential efficacy of PLEX on AAV-related outcome.

Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics® MCS® plus and Trima Accel®

BACKGROUND

Single-donor platelets (SDPs) prepared by sophisticated automated equipment offer several advantages over random-donor platelets and are being increasingly used to support thrombocytopenic patients. Different apheresis machines working on the principle of centrifugation are being used worldwide to collect platelets. This retrospective study was done to compare plateletpheresis on two automated cell seperators - Haemonetics^® MCS^® Plus and Trima Accel^®.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for 100 single-donor plateletpheresis procedures, fifty on each machine, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Donor characteristics were analyzed by Student's t-test and no significant difference was found between the two groups. The parameters compared between the two machines were yield, collection efficiency, blood volume processed, procedure time, acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD) used, leukodepletion achieved, quality control of the products, and adverse donor reactions.

RESULTS

Platelet yield (3.054 ± 0.14 vs. 3.120 ± 0.25), quality control of the platelets, leukodepletion achieved, and donor safety were comparable in both the machines. The blood volume processed (2230.74 ± 227.01 vs. 2452.90 ± 318.61), ACD used during procedure (265.48 ± 43.21 vs. 298.10 ± 53.32), procedural time (55.92 ± 13.00 vs. 68.86 ± 12.64), and the postprocedural decrease in donor count in Trima Accel^® (183.10 ± 23.99 vs. 161.44 ± 63.47) were significantly less than those in Haemonetics^® MCS^® Plus. The median collection efficiency of Trima Accel^® was found to be greater than Haemonetics^® MCS^® Plus (0.000649 vs. 0.000608, P = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Both Trima Accel^® and Haemonetics^® MCS^® Plus can collect SDPs safely and efficiently. Trima Accel^® has higher collection efficiency and reduced incidence of citrate-related adverse effects. It also has better potential to optimize productivity due to decreased procedural time.

Retrospective study of the adverse events of the treatment for an acute attack of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) is an initially recommended therapy for an acute attack of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). For those who do not respond to steroid treatment, plasma exchange (PLEX) is generally added-on. We evaluated adverse events of an acute treatment in NMOSD patients in a university-based hospital during January 2009 and December 2017. Ninety-seven patients with 177 attacks were collected. The therapy included IVMP alone (123 events, 62.4%), IVMP followed by PLEX (46 events, 23.4%) and, PLEX alone (8 events, 4.5%). Adverse events occurred in 36.7% of the IVMP group and 61.1% of the PLEX group. The most common adverse event was hyperglycemia (43.5%) followed by infection (29%) in the former and hypocalcemia (63.6%) followed by hypofibrinogen (42.4%), hypotension (30.3%), and infection (21.2%) in the latter. One severe adverse event was documented in the IVMP group and 13 events in the PLEX groups, nevertheless, all were manageable.

The Challenge of Variability in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Manufacturing

Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell manufacturing involves the modification and expansion of T cells obtained by apheresis collection from a patient. The mechanism of apheresis collection and the specific clinical features seen in these patients combine to generate apheresis products with high variability of content. Manufacturers often attempt to minimize this variability such that processes can be standardize in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). Such standardization improves efficiency and helps to ensure robustness of the overall process. Apheresis product variability can negatively impact T cell manufacturing success. Patient and collection driven variability often leads to non-T cells entering the apheresis product. Many of these cells can directly or indirectly impair T cell activation and expansion, decreasing the manufacturing success rate. Therefore, patient driven variability observed in apheresis products, must be mitigated through downstream processing. T cell enrichment is one step in the manufacturing cycle that can reduce process variability by generating more uniform downstream material. However, current T cell enrichment methods have limitations. Much of this type of variability can be avoided by collecting patients earlier in their disease or treatment course, this is not current, widespread or standard practice. While variability poses challenges to successful CAR T cell manufacturing and mitigation strategies can be successful, more work is needed in this area.

Educating Multidisciplinary Care Teams, Patients, and Caregivers on CAR T-Cell Therapy

Two anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are approved for adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after more than two lines of therapy. Although CAR T-cell therapy has demonstrated significant efficacy for some patients, the treatment process can be long and complex and each phase is associated with unique challenges. Care for patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy also involves many health-care players, including physicians, advanced practitioners, nurse coordinators, nurse educators, apheresis nurses, inpatient and outpatient nurses, cellular therapy technologists, case managers, social workers, and many more. Dedicated educational efforts for patients, caregivers, and clinical providers that make up the multidisciplinary care team are warranted for optimal treatment. Here we present an overview of key elements for education along the treatment journey with CAR T-cell therapy, including considerations for each stage of therapy and specific recommendations for care teams, patients, and caregivers. We also present examples of educational programs that have been implemented at our institution.

Quantitative assessment of the anticoagulant in plasma units collected by plasmapheresis

BACKGROUND

To date, the quantification of the anticoagulant (ACD-A) in plasma units has been based on theoretical calculations. An accurate quantification could help minimize the risks associated with plasmapheresis, given that the total ACD-A used during the procedure is distributed between the donor and the plasma unit. Our aim was to experimentally quantify the volume of ACD-A in units collected by plasmapheresis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We used proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure the ACD-A volume in 295 plasma units collected by the Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Italy. We analyzed the determinants of the differences between estimated and measured ACD-A through multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

The experimentally measured ACD-A in plasma units was variable, with 45% of the samples showing a discrepancy of more than 15 mL compared to the manufacturer's estimate. ACD-A was underestimated for higher density of the units (p < 0.0005); a weak association was also observed with triglycerides (underestimated for higher levels, p = 0.015) and sex (overestimated in females, p = 0.008), but our model explained only 35% of the individual variability.

CONCLUSION

The manufacturer's algorithms do not accurately estimate the ACD-A in units collected by plasmapheresis. Donor-related characteristics may affect ACD-A distribution between donor and plasma unit, thereby explaining the discrepancies between estimate and measurement. Errors in the estimate of the ACD-A actually received by donors could hamper studies on dose-response relationship between anticoagulant and adverse reactions. Our work should stimulate research on tailored procedures aimed at minimizing the anticoagulant received by donors and increasing plasmapheresis safety.

The effect of intravenous insulin, apheresis and oral lipid-lowering agents on non-fasting hypertriglyceridemia and associated pancreatitis

OBJECTIVES

There is evidence that increasing severity of hypertriglyceridemia increases the risk of acute pancreatitis. There is a debate about superiority of treatment methods and previous works have specifically called for direct comparison between IV insulin and apheresis techniques. Identify patient characteristics predictive of lipid-lowering therapy selection in a large community hospital for treatment of hypertriglyceridemia; evaluate for a concentration-dependent relationship between hypertriglyceridemia severity and risk of acute pancreatitis; assess for differences in clinical outcomes between patients treated with IV insulin versus apheresis.

METHODS

Single center, retrospective cohort study including patients with hypertriglyceridemia between January 2007 and December 2016. Main measures included frequency of pancreatitis, choice of lipid-lowering therapy, and clinical comparisons of diet, oral lipid-lowering agents, IV insulin, and apheresis.

RESULTS

Initial serum triglyceride level and disease acuity was higher among patients in insulin and apheresis groups. Neither triglyceride level, Charlson comorbidity index, age, BISAP score, nor initial CRP predicted use of IV insulin versus apheresis. Prevalence of pancreatitis increased with higher triglyceride level, reaching 48% with triglycerides >2000 md/dL (p < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in serum triglycerides at each time interval (p < 0.05) in patients treated with IV insulin and apheresis, but no difference in clearance rate between the two. Length of stay did not differ between IV insulin and apheresis.

CONCLUSION

The presence of pancreatitis, hyperglycemia, and hypertriglyceridemia severity influenced selection of therapies like IV insulin and apheresis. We found no superiority of either IV insulin or apheresis in the treatment of severe hypertriglyceridemia among patients hospitalized for pancreatitis.

Adverse Events During Apheresis Procedures: Audit at a Tertiary Hospital

Apheretic platelets are better quality blood components which reduce donor exposure and chances of TTIs to transfusion recipients when compared to the whole blood derived components. Though safe, these apheretic donations are associated with donor adverse events. We evaluated the incidence of such adverse events associated with the modern apheresis procedures that would provide an insight as well as help formulating preventive steps to avoid frequent occurrences of such events. This prospective audit-based observational study was conducted over 1 year. Donors for plateletpheresis were selected as per the standard operating procedure of the Apheresis Lab. The apheresis procedures were done on the MCS+ (Haemonetics Corp.), Trima Accel (Terumo BCT) and COM.TEC (Fresenius Kabi AG). 1740 apheresis procedures were performed, out of which 1708 were plateletpheresis and 32 therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) procedures for 7 patients. A total of 102 adverse events were noted; of which, 80 (78.43 %) events were associated with donors, 15 (14.71 %) were owed to equipment related problems and 7 (6.86 %) were technical aberrations. All the events associated with donors were mild. No adverse events were reported with any of the 32 TPEs. Apheresis procedures are associated with adverse events which can be reduced by meticulous donor-vigilance, superior training modules for the technical personnel and continued supervision of experienced transfusion medicine specialists. Continued efforts towards making the donor's experience with apheresis more pleasant give a forward thrust to the noble vision of preparing a voluntary apheresis donor pool in India.