Evaluation of the pneumatic tube system for transportation of packed red cell units

Evaluation of a rail logistics transmission system for the transportation of blood components within a medical centre

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rail logistics transmission systems (RLTSs) are commonly used for the transportation of blood samples, pathological specimens and other medical materials in many hospitals, as they are rapid, secure, cost-effective and intelligent. However, few studies have evaluated blood component transportation from blood banks to the patient care areas of hospitals using RLTS. In this study, we evaluate the RLTS used for the transportation of blood components within a medical centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dispatch of blood components, including packed red blood cells (pRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate and platelet units, from a blood bank to critical care areas or general wards was done using RLTS. Parameters such as the delivery time, temperature, physical integrity and blood component quality were evaluated via analytical testing using specimens obtained before and after transportation by RLTS.

RESULTS

The turnaround time and temperature of all tested blood units via RLTS transportation were able to meet the clinical demands of blood component delivery (median time: 323 s [118-668 s]; temperature variation: 4.5-8.9°C for pRBCs and FFP and 21.5-23.5°C for cryoprecipitate and platelet units). Furthermore, parameters of pRBC quality, including the haemolysis index and potassium and lactate dehydrogenase levels in plasma, were not significantly different before and after transportation through RLTS. Similarly, RLTS transportation affected neither the basic coagulation test results in FFP and cryoprecipitate specimens nor platelet aggregation and activation markers in apheresis platelet specimens.

CONCLUSION

Hospital-wide delivery of blood components via RLTS seems to be safe, reliable and cost-effective and does not have any negative impact on blood quality. Therefore, the establishment of standard criteria, protocols and guidelines based on further studies is needed.

Validation of blood components transport through a pneumatic tube system

Introduction

Urgent blood component transfusions may be life-saving for patients in hemorrhagic shock. Measures to reduce the time taken to provide these transfusions, such as uncrossmatched transfusion or abbreviated testing, are available. However, transport time is still an additional delay and the use of a pneumatic tube system (PTS) may be an alternative to shorten the transport time of blood components.

Objectives

To assess pneumatic tube system transportation of blood components based on a validation protocol. Methods: Pre- and post-transport quality control laboratory parameters, visual appearance, transport time and temperature of the packed red blood cells (RBCs), thawed fresh plasma (TFP), cryoprecipitate (CR), and platelet concentrate (PC) were evaluated. Parameters were compared between transport via pneumatic tube and courier.

Results

A total of 23 units of RBCs, 50 units of TFP, 30 units of CR and ten units of PC were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were found between pre- and post-transport laboratory results. There was also no difference in laboratory parameters between transport modalities (PTS versus courier). All blood components transported matched regulatory requirements for quality criteria. The temperature during transport remained stable and the transport time via PTS was significantly shorter than the courier's transport time (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The PTS was considered a fast, safe and reliable means of transportation for blood components, also securing quality prerequisites.

Urgent Delivery - Validation and Operational Implementation of Urgent Blood Delivery by Modern High Speed Hospital Pneumatic Tube System to Support Bleeding Emergencies Within a Hospital Massive Transfusion Protocol

BACKGROUND

Timely blood delivery to patients with critical bleeding poses logistic challenges. A modern, high speed hospital pneumatic tube system (PTS) is one solution, but blood units may be subjected to high-speed torque and acceleration/deceleration forces.

OBJECTIVE

To validate a new PTS system for potential use at our 1,400-bed hospital in Singapore.

METHOD

Our validation included red blood cells, platelets, thawed plasma, and cryoprecipitate units transported from the blood bank for a distance of 820 meters (PTS track), at a velocity of 3-6 meters per second. Transit time, temperature, bag integrity, and blood quality were assessed visually and through analytical testing on pre- and post-PTS specimens.

RESULTS

Blood units arrived physically intact in less than 8 minutes. The temperature for each was within the acceptable range. Comparative testing of pre-PTS and post-PTS specimens showed no significant difference in physical quality and analyzed parameters (P> .05).

CONCLUSIONS

High speed PTS transportation of blood components has satisfactory fidelity and speed, without significant impact on quality. As a result, we incorporated PTS blood delivery into the hospital massive-transfusion protocol and successfully operationalized that new system.

Reducing delivery times of emergency blood products through pneumatic tube systems

OBJECTIVES:

Recent advances in damage control resuscitation have advocated a push for early transfusion to maintain circulating volume and minimization of crystalloid use. While measures such as using rapid-matched group specific blood or uncrossmatched blood have been implemented to shorten this wait, delivery times can still be improved. We explored reducing delivery times by use of a pneumatic tube delivery system already built in our hospital. Few studies have evaluated this using fresh blood samples for one-way transport. We modified and evaluated our pneumatic tube delivery system for delivery timings and quality parameters; designing a robust protocol that also tested aged blood for simulated returns unlike other previous studies.

METHODS:

Delivery timings of emergency blood products by our present portering system were collected and compared against that of products sent through the pneumatic tube system (PTS). The samples sent through the PTS were also tested and analyzed for temperature, quality, and hemolysis in accordance with established blood banking quality guidelines.

RESULTS:

Blood products delivered by our PTS showed satisfactory conformance with all parameters of temperature, timing, and hemolysis. We showed a significant reduction in transport delivery times from mean of 8 min 43 s to 2 min 23 s.

CONCLUSIONS:

Delivery of blood products by our modified PTS is safe and significantly reduces delivery time. This time savings could be clinically significant in resuscitation. Usage of the PTS could also cut down on workforce utilization of porters, freeing them up for other tasks in the hospital.