Comparison of three supraglottic airway devices for airway rescue in the prone position: A manikin-based study

Emergency airway management in the prone position: an observational mannequin-based simulation study

INTRODUCTION

Accidental extubation during prone position can be a life-threatening emergency requiring rapid establishment of the airway. However, there is limited evidence of the best airway rescue method for this potentially catastrophic emergency. The aim of this study was to determine the most effective method to recover the airway in case of accidental extubation during prone positioning by comparing three techniques (supraglottic airway, video laryngoscopy, and fiber-optic bronchoscopy) in a simulated environment.

METHODS

Eleven anesthesiologists and 12 anesthesia fellows performed the simulated airway management using 3 different techniques on a mannequin positioned prone in head pins. Time required for definitive airway management and the success rates were measured.

RESULTS

The success rates of airway rescue were 100% with the supraglottic airway device (SAD), 69.6% with the video laryngoscope (CMAC), and 91.3% with the FOB. The mean (SD) time to insertion was 18.1 (4.8) s for the supraglottic airway, 78.3 (32.0) s for the CMAC, and 57.3 (24.6) s for the FOB. There were significant differences in the time required for definitive airway management between the SAD and FOB (t = 5.79, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 25.92-52.38), the SAD and CMAC (t = 8.90, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 46.93-73.40), and the FOB and CMAC (t = 3.11, p = 0.003, 95% CI = 7.78-34.25).

CONCLUSION

The results of this simulation-based study suggest that the SAD I-gel is the best technique to manage accidental extubation during prone position by establishing a temporary airway with excellent success rate and shorter procedure time. When comparing techniques for securing a definitive airway, the FOB was more successful than the CMAC.

Supraglottic airway devices: a powerful strategy in airway management

The escalating airway management demands of cancer patients have prompted us to continually curate airway devices, with supraglottic airway devices (SADs) playing a significant role in this regard. SADs serve as instrumental tools for maintaining an open upper airway. Since the inception of the earliest SADs in the early 1980s, an array of advanced and enhanced second-generation devices have been employed in clinical settings. These upgraded SADs integrate specific features designed to enhance positive-pressure ventilation and mitigate the risk of aspiration. Nowadays, they are extensively used in general anesthesia procedures and play a critical role in difficult airway management, pre-hospital care, and emergency medicine. In certain situations, SADs may be deemed a superior alternative to endotracheal tube (ETT) and can be employed in a broader spectrum of surgical and non-surgical cases. This review provides an overview of the current evidence, a summary of classifications, relevant application scenarios, and areas for improvement in the development or clinical application of future SADs.

The placement of four different supraglottic airway devices by medical students: a manikin study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although endotracheal intubation is the gold standard in airway management, this procedure requires both technical training and experience. Supraglottic airway devices are an alternative to endotracheal intubation and are simpler, less invazive, and require less time for placement compared with endotrakeal intubation. Aim of the study was to evaluate the success rates, ease of use, duration of application, and maneuver performance of different supraglottic airway devices (SADs) used by term-5 medical students on a manikin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Hospital, Turkey, between April and June 2022. Term 5 Medical students (n = 111) were asked to place four different SAD [classical laryngeal mask, suprema laryngeal mask, ProSeal laryngeal mask (pLMA), I-gel] on an adult airway manikin. After the students were trained in the use of the devices, the ease of use for each, duration of successful application, success of application and use of optimization maneuvers were recorded. The participants were asked to distinguish the device they felt most confident to place and the most difficult to implement.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the groups in ease and duration of application (p < 0.001). The most difficult and longest application time was with pLMA and the easiest and shortest was with I-gel (p < 0.05). The number of application failure was also highest for pLMA (p < 0.001). It was found that the participants distinguished (41%) I-gel as the most confident device to use, (84%) pLMA as the most difficult device to use for airway control.

CONCLUSIONS

I-gel was found to be superior to others in terms of ease of use, duration and success of application.

Safety, Efficacy, and Ease of Insertion of Gnana Laryngeal Airway (GLA-4): A Prospective Clinical Study Utilizing the Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway With a Suction Tubing

INTRODUCTION

Utilizing laryngeal mask airways to maintain patients' airways is advantageous because it enables the anesthesiologist to keep the patient spontaneously inhaling and is less traumatic to the airway than intubation. Newer designs such as the Gnana laryngeal mask airway design permit real-time suctioning while the mask is on a patient.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of the efficacy of Gnana laryngeal airway 4 (GLA-4) in 50 patients undergoing colonoscopy. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were provided with propofol; GLA-4 was applied to secure the airway; and correct placement was verified.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the study (44% female, 56% male, mean age: 56.5 years, mean BMI: 33.3). Twelve patients were assigned American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 2, and 38 were assigned ASA class 3. The first attempt of GLA-4 insertion was successful in 47 patients, and two attempts were required for the successful placement of the GLA-4 in two patients. The successful placement was not achieved in one patient. The average time to successful insertion was 27.1 ± 3.9s. The average volume of oropharyngeal secretions suctioned through the suction catheter was 9.96 ± 2.31 mL. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in the 50 patients. There were no reports of sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia, or cough immediately postop.

CONCLUSION

GLA-4 can be inserted safely with adequate periglottic occlusion. This laryngeal mask is unique and desirable due to its ability to evacuate oropharyngeal secretions while in place to prevent laryngospasm. To establish the role of GLA-4 in broader clinical situations, additional clinical trials and studies are required.

Perception and success rate of using advanced airway management by hospital-based paramedics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Objective

The study aimed to measure the success rate of pre-hospital tracheal intubation (TI) and supraglottic airway devices (SADs) performed by paramedics for adult patients and to assess the perception of paramedics of advanced airway management.

Method

The study consisted of two phases: phase 1 was a retrospective analysis to assess the TI and SADs' success rates when applied by paramedics for adult patients aged >14 years from 2012 to 2017, and phase 2 was a distributed questionnaire to assess paramedics' perception of advanced airway management.

Result

In phase 1, 24 patients met our inclusion criteria. Sixteen (67%) patients had TI, of whom five had failed TI but then were successfully managed using SADs. The TI success rate was 69% from the first two attempts compared to SADs (100% from first attempt). In phase 2, 63/90 (70%) paramedics responded to the questionnaire, of whom 60 (95%) completed it. Forty-eight (80%) paramedics classified themselves to be moderately or very competent with advanced airway management. However, most of them (80%) performed only 1-5 TIs or SADs a year.

Conclusion

Hospital-based paramedics (i.e. paramedics who are working at hospitals and not in the ambulance service, and who mostly respond to small restricted areas in Saudi Arabia) handled few patients requiring advanced airway management and had a higher competency level with SADs than with TI. The study findings could be impacted by the low sample size. Future research is needed on the success rate and impact on outcomes of using pre-hospital advanced airway management, and on the challenges of mechanical ventilation use during interfacility transfer.

Blind intubation through an i-gel® in the prone position: A prospective cohort study

Accidental extubation in the prone position is a medical emergency in which quick and low resource demanding airway management is required. Regaining oxygenation is the primary goal, but sometimes intubation may be required to regain oxygenation. Blind intubation through an i-gel® (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK) may be a quick and low resource demanding method. However, the success rate of the use of an i-gel as an intubation conduit in the prone position is unknown. This was a prospective study in patients scheduled for lumbar surgery. General anaesthesia was induced in the prone position and an i-gel was inserted. After successful ventilation, up to three attempts at intubation using a VivaSight-SL single-lumen tube (Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark) were performed. The first attempt was blinded for the operator and the patient's head was in a neutral position. The second attempt was blinded for the operator with the patient's head rotated laterally. The third attempt was on-screen and allowed various manoeuvres to facilitate intubation. A success rate of 70% was deemed clinically acceptable. The study was terminated early after 14 subjects because the success rate of 70% was not achievable. However, ventilation using the i-gel in the prone position was successful in 13 patients (93%). Intubation was successful in only one patient at the first attempt, one patient at the second attempt and three patients at the third attempt. Overall, the success rate was 36%. Blind intubation using an i-gel as an intubation conduit in the prone position is not recommended.Netherlands Trial Register number NL6387 (NTR7659).

Supraglottic airway device versus a channeled or non-channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope for accidental extubation in the prone position: A randomized crossover manikin study

BACKGROUND

It is very rare but challenging to perform emergency airway management for accidental extubation in a patient whose head and neck are fixed in the prone position when urgently turning the patient to the supine position would be unsafe. The authors hypothesized that tracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscope would allow effective airway rescue in this situation compared with a supraglottic airway device and designed a randomized crossover manikin study to test this hypothesis.

METHODS

The authors compared airway rescue performances of the 3 devices-the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA; Teleflex Medical, Westmeath, Ireland) as a reference; the Pentax AWS (AWS; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) as a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope; and the McGRATH videolaryngoscope (McGRATH; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) as a nonchanneled blade type in a manikin fixed to the operating table in the prone position. Twenty-one anesthesiologists performed airway management on the prone manikin with the 3 devices, and the time required for intubation/ventilation and the success rates were recorded.

RESULTS

The median (range) intubation/ventilation times with the PLMA, AWS, and McGRATH were 24.5 (13.5-89.5) s, 29.9 (17.1-79.8) s, and 46.7 (21.9-211.7) s, respectively. There was no significant difference in intubation/ventilation times between the PLMA and AWS. The AWS permitted significantly faster tracheal intubation than did the McGRATH (P = 0.006). The success rates with the PLMA (100%) and AWS (100%) were significantly greater than that with the McGRATH (71.4%). Airway management performance of the PLMA and AWS was comparable between devices and better than that of the McGRATH in the prone position.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that tracheal intubation can provide a more secure airway and more stable ventilation than the PLMA, re-intubation with a channeled blade-type videolaryngoscope such as the AWS may be a useful method of airway rescue for accidental extubation in patients in the prone position.