1
|
Yuan B, Zhang L, Yang S, Ouyang H, Han S, Jiang L, Wei F, Yuan H, Liu X, Liu Z. Imaging Features of Aggressive Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 101 Patients From Single Center. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1449-1461. [PMID: 33499650 PMCID: PMC9393967 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220982280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES Giant cell tumors (GCTs) of the mobile spine can be locally aggressive. This study described and classified the typical and atypical appearance of aggressive spinal GCTs according to imaging findings to help the imaging diagnosis, especially for patients with rapid neurological deficit that may require emergent surgery without biopsy. METHODS Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients diagnosed with aggressive spinal GCTs at single center were reviewed. RESULTS Overall, 101 patients with 100 CT images and 94 MR images were examined. All lesions were osteolytic with cortical destruction; 95 lesions showed epidural extension; 90 were centered in the vertebral body; 82 showed pathological fracture and/or collapse of the vertebral body; 78 had pseudotrabeculation on CT; 80 showed low-to-iso signal intensity or heterogeneous high-signal intensity with cystic areas on the T2-weighted images; 9 showed fluid-fluid level on T2-weighted images; and 61 patients showed marked enhancement on contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Forty-one lesions (40.6%) had at least 1 atypical radiographic feature: 19 involved ≥2 segments; 11 were centered in the posterior neural arch; 10 had a paravertebral mass over 2 segments; 16 showed partial margin sclerosis with partial cortical destruction on CT scans; and 3 showed mineralization within the tumor on CT. Eighty-eight patients underwent CT-guided biopsy with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.3%. CONCLUSIONS Spinal GCTs might appear more radiologically atypical, and about 40% of the lesions may have at least 1 atypical feature. CT-guided biopsies are recommended for definitive diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Yuan
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China,Peking University Health Science Center, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Lihua Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Shaomin Yang
- Department of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Hanqiang Ouyang
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Songbo Han
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Jiang
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China,Liang Jiang and Zhongjun Liu, Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China. Emails: ;
| | - Feng Wei
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Huishu Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Liu
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongjun Liu
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China,Liang Jiang and Zhongjun Liu, Orthopaedic Department, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China. Emails: ;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Multiprofessional Management of Giant Cell Tumors in the Cervical Spine: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 2021; 151:53-60. [PMID: 33857672 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are rare bone tumors, especially in the cervical spine. Generally considered benign, local aggressiveness and metastatic growth have been described. Surgical concepts for GCTB are challenged by complex neurovascular anatomy. Specific clinical management guidelines are nonexistent. This systematic review aims to compile existing evidence on the treatment of GCTB of the cervical spine. METHODS Four electronic databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. All clinical studies reporting the treatment of GCTB in the human cervical spine in English language were found eligible for review. RESULTS Seven studies were included in the synthesis including a total number of 54 patients. Of those patients, 46 (85%) were treated for naive nonrecurrent GCTB. Only 1 study is considered a cohort study; all other studies were case reports. Generally, intralesional procedures were performed in 13 (24%) cases. Subtotal resections were reported for 11 (20%) patients. Twenty-eight (52%) patients were surgically treated with piecemeal resection, en-bloc resection, or spondylectomy. Thirty-six (67%) patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. A combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy was reported in 2 (4%) cases. Bisphosphonates were prescribed for 9 (17%) patients. Inconsistent reporting of outcome data did not allow for comparative analyses. CONCLUSIONS Best available evidence suggests that the most aggressive surgical approach should be the main goal of any GCTB surgery. No specific adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment can be recommended as superior due to a lack of comparative data. Therapeutic approaches need to be planned thoroughly on an individual basis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Al-Shamary E, Al-Dhafeeri W, Al-Sharydah A, Al-Suhibani S, Kussaibi H, Al-Issawi W. Total Spondylectomy for Upper Thoracic Spine Giant Cell Tumor: A Case Report. Case Rep Oncol 2019; 12:131-138. [PMID: 31043951 PMCID: PMC6477464 DOI: 10.1159/000497379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Giant cell tumors (GCT) are benign lesions that are generally locally aggressive tumors with occasional malignant behavior. These tumors are most frequently encountered in long bones; however, they also occur rarely in the spine. GCT of the spine are rare pathological entities, and spinal involvement shows a sacral predilection, with only a few cases involving the supra-sacral segment (mobile spine). Only a few cases of thoracic spinal GCT are reported in the literature; these tumors are particularly uncommon in the thoracic segment. Presentation of Case A 29-year-old man presented with a complaint of neck pain over the previous six months that radiated to his left hand. GCT of the upper thoracic spine was diagnosed, which was surgically managed using a 2-stage approach involving total resection of the tumor followed by spondylectomy and multilevel spinal fixation. Discussion Accurate diagnosis of vertebral column lesions, and choosing an optimum management plan are crucial. In the majority of cases, En-bloc resection of GCTs is not feasible ought to the close contact of the lesion with the spinal cord. Larger studies are encouraged to ascertain the efficacy of variable management approaches, particularly compared with piecemeal resection techniques. Conclusion Spinal GCT are a unique group of tumors with an uncommon and unexpected presentation. Although surgery is the mainstay of treatment for spinal GCT, the management of this tumor can be challenging. No clear management algorithm has been established, and the tumor displays an unpredictable course. Therefore, each case needs tailored treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eid Al-Shamary
- Neurosurgery Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wafa Al-Dhafeeri
- Neurosurgery Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulaziz Al-Sharydah
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sari Al-Suhibani
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Haitham Kussaibi
- Pathology Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Wisam Al-Issawi
- Neurosurgery Department, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lehner B, Rehnitz C, Geisbüsch A, Akbar M, Omlor GW. [Diagnostics and treatment of benign spinal tumors]. DER ORTHOPADE 2017; 46:505-509. [PMID: 28477060 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3432-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Benign tumors of the spine are rare and may lead to unspecific back pain. The classification of the lesion is typically achieved with a combination of imaging techniques (MRI and CT scans) and, in some cases, a histological sampling to allow differentiation from malignant processes. Both open and interventional (CT guided) biopsies are possible, depending on the localization of the tumor. Treatment strategies are diverse, require an interdisciplinary approach, and include operative and interventional procedures. The following article gives an overview of the most important benign tumors of the spine, the typical features in imaging, and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Lehner
- Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - C Rehnitz
- Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - A Geisbüsch
- Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - M Akbar
- Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - G W Omlor
- Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|