Analysis of the spinal nerve roots in relation to the adjacent vertebral bodies with respect to a posterolateral vertebral body replacement procedure

The projection of the thoracic nerve roots and their connection with intervertebral discs: a cadaver and radiological study

BACKGROUND

The anatomical features of the thoracic nerve roots in connection with intervertebral discs may prevent surgery-related complications and improve patients' neurological functional status during thoracic spine surgery. There is limited literature evidence regarding this concept using cadavers.

PURPOSE

To elucidate the qualitative anatomical features of the thoracic nerve roots in connection with intervertebral discs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen formalin-preserved spine specimens were used in this study. Small pieces of stainless-steel wires were placed along the root sleeves from their points of origin, after exposing the dural sac and bilateral nerve roots. The standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken after the placement of the wires. Measurements were done on radiographs using the picture archiving communication system.

RESULTS

Take-off angles of the nerve roots at the coronal plane gradually increased from the level of T2 (36.1°±2.72°) to T9 (84.1°±1.84°) and from T9, it decreased to T12 (46.3° ± 2.67°). Similar variation tendency was discovered in take-off angles of the nerve roots at the sagittal plane. No consistent tendency was found both in the distance from the origin of the root sleeve to its superior and inferior vertebral endplate. Distance from the origin of the root sleeve to the posterior midline (DM) exponentially decreased from T1 (8.2 ± 0.87 mm) to T4 (6.0 ± 0.93 mm). It slowly increased from T5 (5.5 ± 0.68 mm) to T12 (10.9 ± 1.79 mm), with T5 having the smallest DM. Distance between the origins of neighboring nerve roots showed an obvious increase from the T1-T2 interval (23.1 ± 2.22 mm) to T7-T8 interval (30.9 ± 2.68 mm). However, it progressively decreased at the T10-T11 interval (26.0 ± 2.40 mm).

CONCLUSION

The dimensions of the thoracic nerve roots vary greatly from T1 to T12 intervertebral discs. Sound knowledge of these anatomical features of the thoracic nerve is mandatory for the thoracic spine surgery, especially in the posterolateral approach and transforaminal endoscopic surgery.

Anatomical and technical factors affecting the neural response to epidural spinal cord stimulation

OBJECTIVE

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a common neurostimulation therapy to treat chronic pain. Computational models represent a valuable tool to study the potential mechanisms of action of SCS and to optimize the design and implementation of SCS technologies. However, it is imperative that these computational models include the appropriate level of detail to accurately predict the neural response to SCS and to correlate model predictions with clinical outcomes. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate several anatomic and technical factors that may affect model-based predictions of neural activation during thoracic SCS.

APPROACH

We developed computational models that consisted of detailed finite element models of the lower thoracic spinal cord, surrounding tissues, and implanted SCS electrode arrays. We positioned multicompartment models of sensory axons within the spinal cord to calculate the activation threshold for each sensory axon. We then investigated how activation thresholds changed as a function of several anatomical variables (e.g. spine geometry, dorsal rootlet anatomy), stimulation type (i.e. voltage-controlled vs. current-controlled), electrode impedance, lead position, lead type, and electrical properties of surrounding tissues (e.g. dura conductivity, frequency-dependent conductivity).

MAIN RESULTS

Several anatomic and modeling factors produced significant percent differences or errors in activation thresholds. Rostrocaudal positioning of the cathode with respect to the vertebrae had a large effect (up to 32%) on activation thresholds. Variability in electrode impedance produced significant changes in activation thresholds for voltage-controlled stimulation (38% to 51%), but had little effect on activation thresholds for current-controlled stimulation (less than 13%). Changing the dura conductivity also produced significant differences in activation thresholds.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrates several anatomic and technical factors that can affect the neural response to SCS. These factors should be considered in clinical implementation and in future computational modeling studies of thoracic SCS.

A Novel Height-Adjustable Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide-66 Vertebral Body for Reconstruction of Thoracolumbar Structural Stability After Spinal Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of thoracolumbar structural stability is a formidable challenge for spine surgeons after vertebral body tumor resection. Various disadvantages of the currently used expandable or nonexpandable cages have limited their clinical applications. We sought to develop a novel prosthesis for clinical use and assess its preliminary clinical outcome in reconstruction of thoracolumbar structural stability after spinal tumor resection.

METHODS

Using data obtained from a retrospective analysis of the morphological characteristics of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and endplates in previously reported studies, we modified the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 (n-HA/PA66) strut into a novel height-adjustable vertebral body. A retrospective study was performed of 7 patients who had undergone reconstruction of thoracolumbar structural stability with this novel prosthesis from August 2016 to January 2017.

RESULTS

A novel height-adjustable vertebral body (AHVB) composed of n-HA/PA66 with 2 separate components with a 163° contact surface at each end was manufactured. The height-adjustable range was 28-37 mm. No significant implant-related complications were observed in the process of operation. All patients experienced a significant reduction in pain, with the visual analog scale score decreasing from 7.9 to 4.0. Neurological improvement was assessed using the Frankel grading system after surgery. Postoperative radiographic and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging findings indicated that the operated segment was stable, the outcome of kyphosis correction was good, and no prosthesis subsidence or dislocation was observed.

CONCLUSION

This novel prosthesis has many advantages in the reconstruction of height, lordosis, and alignment after thoracolumbar spinal tumor resection and has a favorable prospect for clinical application.