Reliability of motor parameters for follow-up after local steroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome

A Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Splinting and Splinting Plus Local Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction Corticosteroid injection and wrist-hand splint are two of the most commonly used conservative options for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study compares the effectiveness of splinting and splinting plus local steroid injection in improving clinical and nerve conduction findings of patients with CTS. Methods A total of 44 patients with CTS were randomized into two groups. Group A used a full-time neutral wrist splint and group B was injected with 20 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and was given a full-time neutral wrist splint for 12 weeks. Clinical and nerve conduction findings of the patients were evaluated at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after interventions. The chi-square test was used to test the association of different study variables. Z-test was used to test the significant difference between the two proportions. The means were compared by t-test. ANOVA was used to compare more than two mean values. Results The mean difference of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and median nerve latency at baseline and 12th week after treatment was significantly higher in group B than in group A (p<0.05). In intragroup comparison, there was significant improvement in the patient satisfaction, and clinical and nerve conduction values between the baseline level and 4 weeks after intervention and between the baseline and 12 weeks after intervention (P < 0.01). However, the inter-group comparisons were not significant. Conclusion Both of the management methods (splinting plus corticosteroid injection and splinting) have significant effects on the improvement of symptoms, and functional and nerve conduction status. It seems that splinting plus corticosteroid injection has a little edge over splinting alone during the follow-up periods.

The Relevance of Collision Tests and Quantitative Sensory Testing in Diagnostics and Postoperative Outcome Prediction in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background

The gold standards for the diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and its outcome are undecided. Using clinical and electrophysiological methods, we tried to establish which fibers achieved full postoperative recovery, and the possibility of using non-standard electrophysiological tests as outcome predictors.

Methods

The study group consisted of 35 patients and controls. The Historical–Objective Scale, standard neurography, conduction velocity distribution tests (CVD), and quantitative sensory testing (QST) were performed before and after CTS surgery.

Results

Clinical improvement was observed on average in 54.3% of the patients, higher in less advanced CTS. All parameters improved significantly after surgery, except for CVD; most remained worse than in the controls. Only QST parameters fully returned to normal limits. Patient age and CTS severity were important in the estimation of the risk of no improvement.

Conclusions

The efficiency of minimally invasive CTS surgery is higher in younger patients with less advanced CTS. Complete recovery was present only in small fibers; larger fibers could most likely be responsible for residual signs. We did not notice any benefits in CTS diagnosis using methods of small fiber assessment. QST seemed to be useful in the diagnosis of residual signs, and in deciding upon possible reoperation.