Gynecological diseases in rural India: A critical appraisal of indications and route of surgery along with histopathology correlation of 922 women undergoing major gynecological surgery

Prevalence, socio-demographic determinants, and self-reported reasons for hysterectomy and choice of hospitalization in India

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence of hysterectomy in India because of a lack of data in large-scale, nationally representative health surveys. In 2015-16, the fourth National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4)-a cross-sectional survey-collected for the first-time direct information on hysterectomy and self-reported reasons for undergoing the procedure among women in the reproductive age group. The current study evaluates the prevalence, determinants, and choice of hospitalization (Public vs. Private) for conducting hysterectomy in India among women aged 15-49 years in 29 states and seven union territories (UTs) based on the new large-scale population-based nationally representative dataset (NFHS 5).

METHODS

Cross-tabulations and percentage distributions were utilized to analyse the prevalence of hysterectomy and the choice of hospitalization (public vs. private) across different socioeconomic backgrounds and reasons for undergoing hysterectomy. A multivariate binary logistic regression model was also used to find statistically significant determinants of hysterectomy.

RESULTS

In India as a whole, 3.3% of women aged 15-49 years had undergone a hysterectomy. The percentage of women who had undergone the procedure was found to vary considerably across the states and the UTs. The southern region stands out for the considerably higher prevalence of hysterectomy; particularly in the states of Andhra Pradesh (8.7%) and Telangana (8.2%), the prevalence was very high followed by Bihar (6%) and Gujrat (4%). On the other hand, the North-eastern region had the lowest prevalence of hysterectomy (1.2%). A noticeable fact that emerged was that the majority of the hysterectomies were performed in the private sector (69.6%) in India. But the scenario was quite different in north-eastern region as in this region more hysterectomies were performed in public health facilities (73%) rather than private health facilities (26.7%). Age, place of residence, religion, caste, level of education, geographic region, wealth quintiles, parity, age at first cohabitation of women were found to be the socio-demographic determinants statistically associated with hysterectomy in India. The likelihood of hysterectomy was higher among women living in rural areas (AOR: 1.3, CI: 1.23-1.35), in the richest wealth quintile (AOR 2.6; CI 2.37-2.76) and in the southern region (AOR 1.6; CI 1.47-1.66). The reasons frequently reported for hysterectomy were excessive menstrual bleeding/pain, followed by fibroids/cysts.

CONCLUSION

This study has attempted to analyse hysterectomy prevalence and its socio-economic determinants using the latest fifth round of NFHS data of all the states and covering 21 states and union territories of India, which gives wider coverage of hysterectomy and more recent with accurate data. More research is needed therefore to unravel the complex dynamics of hysterectomy in India (and elsewhere) which could be used to help women make more informed choices and in turn advance their reproductive health and rights.

Epidemiology of Adenomyosis

Adenomyosis, characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium, can have a substantial impact on the quality of women's lives. Despite this, the epidemiologic research on this condition lags considerably behind that of other noncancerous reproductive health conditions. The lack of progress and knowledge is due in part to the challenges in designing valid epidemiologic studies, since the diagnosis of adenomyosis historically has been limited to the examination of uterine specimens from hysterectomy. This review describes the available data on the frequency of this condition and the epidemiologic investigation thus far into the risk factors for disease-highlighting the methodologic and inference challenges primarily around study sample selection. We conclude with providing recommendations for approaches to future epidemiologic study that capitalize on the advancements in imaging technology to detect adenomyosis and provide a fuller picture of the occurrence and risk factors for disease.

Regional pattern of hysterectomy among women in India: Evidence from a recent large scale survey

Hysterectomy is one of the major public health issues today. In India, women's attitudes toward menstruation may be a significant driver in seeking hysterectomy. Therefore, we attempted to study the prevalence, associated factors and reasons for hysterectomy among 540,671 ever-married women aged 15-49 years, using data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) conducted during 2015-16 in India. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. These analyses revealed that the prevalence of hysterectomy was 4.1%. The prevalence was highest in the southern region and lowest in the north-eastern regions of India. Results of multivariate models indicated that high parity (odds ratio [OR] 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.52-3.19), high body mass index (OR-1.43; 95% CI 1.35-1.51), older age, early age at first cohabitation, and illiteracy were positively associated with hysterectomy. Excessive menstrual bleeding was the leading reason for hysterectomy in this sample. Hysterectomy has exhibited an upward trend over the years. This may exert adverse effects on the physical, socio-psychological and reproductive health of women. Therefore, it is essential to promote high-quality prevention and treatment choices for women, rather than permanent but potentially inappropriate solutions such as hysterectomy.

Non-decent Vaginal Hysterectomy in Rural Setup of MP: A Poor Acceptance

OBJECTIVE

NDVH is a minimally invasive, safe, effective, and economical surgery. Still AH is preferred for benign gynaecological indications. Our study aims to promote NDVH in all technically possible cases by adequate counselling of the patient.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled 100 women seeking hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions (excluding prolapse) in a teaching hospital. Women were counselled on the basis of 'PREPARED' questionnaire to assess their awareness about NDVH and were offered NDVH as the proposed surgery and result is analysed.

RESULTS

We observed that there was a little awareness about NDVH and its outcome among the subjects. Ten out of 100 patients refused to perform NDVH after counselling and underwent TAH. Rest of the 90 patients opted for NDVH. Forty out of 90 patients were aware about NDVH, but they were sceptical about the outcome, and 50 were totally unaware. After applying 'PREPARED' questionnaire and counselling, we could motivate them to accept NDVH. It was successful in all cases except one where laparotomy was done for ovarian artery retraction. With no significant post-operative complications, early return to routine activity and low cost of surgery, all patients were satisfied with surgical outcome and improved quality of life.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that patients accept the surgery with open mind after proper counselling and detailing of the procedure. Most of the abdominal hysterectomy can be converted successfully to NDVH in technically feasible cases by experienced hands so adequate training to gynaecology residents is the need of the time. NDVH is economical to the patient as well as for the healthcare system.