Prevalence of Nondiabetic Renal Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Clinicopathological Correlation: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center of Assam, India

Screening candidate diagnostic biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

There are big differences in treatments and prognosis between diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD). However, DKD patients couldn't be diagnosed early due to lack of special biomarkers. Urine is an ideal non-invasive sample for screening DKD biomarkers. This study aims to explore DKD special biomarkers by urinary proteomics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

According to the result of renal biopsy, 142 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients were divided into 2 groups: DKD (n = 83) and NDRD (n = 59). Ten patients were selected from each group to define urinary protein profiles by label-free quantitative proteomics. The candidate proteins were further verifyied by parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) methods (n = 40). Proteins which perform the same trend both in PRM and proteomics were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) with expanding the sample size (n = 82). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic biomarkers.

RESULTS

We identified 417 peptides in urinary proteins showing significant difference between DKD and NDRD. PRM verification identified C7, SERPINA4, IGHG1, SEMG2, PGLS, GGT1, CDH2, CDH1 was consistent with the proteomic results and p < 0.05. Three potential biomarkers for DKD, C7, SERPINA4, and gGT1, were verified by ELISA. The combinatied SERPINA4/Ucr and gGT1/Ucr (AUC = 0.758, p = 0.001) displayed higher diagnostic efficiency than C7/Ucr (AUC = 0.632, p = 0.048), SERPINA4/Ucr (AUC = 0.661, p = 0.032), and gGT1/Ucr (AUC = 0.661, p = 0.029) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined index SERPINA4/Ucr and gGT1/Ucr can be considered as candidate biomarkers for diabetic nephropathy after adjusting by urine creatinine.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Glomerular Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Glomerular diseases account for a significant proportion of chronic kidney disease in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The epidemiology of glomerulonephritis is characterized inadequately in LMICs, largely owing to unavailable nephropathology services or uncertainty of the safety of the kidney biopsy procedure. In contrast to high-income countries where IgA nephropathy is the dominant primary glomerular disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is common in large populations across Latin America, Africa, Middle East, and South East Asia, while IgA nephropathy is common in Chinese populations. Despite having a high prevalence of known genetic and viral risk factors that trigger focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis also is common in adults and children in some African countries. Treatment of glomerular diseases in adults and children in LMICs largely is dependent on corticosteroids in combination with other immunosuppressive therapy, which often is cyclophosphamide because of its ready availability and low cost of treatment, despite significant adverse effects. Partial and/or complete remission status reported from studies of glomerular disease subtypes vary across LMIC regions, with high rates of kidney failure, mortality, and disease, and treatment complications often reported. Improving the availability of nephropathology services and ensuring availability of specific therapies are key measures to improving glomerular disease outcomes in LMICs.