Portal hypertension: effect of early splenic artery ligation on platelets count during splenectomy

Early mobilization and delayed arterial ligation (EMDAL) as a surgical technique for splenectomy and shunt surgery in portal hypertension

Backgrounds/Aims

Splenectomy is the most frequently performed procedure as definitive management or as part of shunt surgery or devascularization in portal hypertension. Splenectomy is technically challenging because of the frequent coexistence of multiple collateral varices, splenomegaly, poor liver function, and thrombocytopenia. Early arterial ligation and late mobilization (EALDEM) is the traditional method for splenectomy in portal hypertension. Early spleen mobilization offers good control of the hilum. We aim to compare the effect of the early mobilization and delayed arterial ligation (EMDAL) technique with that of the conventional splenectomy technique in patients with portal hypertension.

Methods

During the study period from September 2011 to September 2022, 173 patients underwent surgical intervention for portal hypertension at our institution. Among these patients, 114 underwent the conventional method of splenectomy (early arterial ligation and late splenic mobilization) while 59 underwent splenectomy with the EMDAL technique. Demographics were compared between the two groups. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test in each group. A minimum follow-up of 12 months was performed in each group.

Results

Demographics and type of surgical procedure were comparable in the two surgical method groups. Median blood loss was higher in the conventional group than in the EMDAL method. The median duration of surgery was comparable in the two surgical procedures. Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV complications were reported more frequently in the conventional group.

Conclusions

The splenic hilum can be controlled well and bleeding can be minimised with early mobilization and delayed arterial ligation.

Portal hypertension in pregnancy - Concealed perils

Pregnancy in women with portal hypertension is high risk due to the danger of variceal haemorrhage, which complicates 15-34% of cases. Variceal bleeding in pregnancy to women with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension is associated with increased risk of abortion (29%) and perinatal death (33%). Pregnancy in women with cirrhosis while less common due to hypogonadism, is associated with additional potential complications of hepatic decompensation and encephalopathy (10%), hepatorenal syndrome, ascites and bacterial peritonitis. Pregnancy in women with cirrhotic portal hypertension is associated with maternal death in 1.6%, and fetal loss in 10-66%. We present a case of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in pregnancy, discussing two other potential critical complications of portal hypertension in pregnancy, splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) and pulmonary hypertension.

Strategies to avoid empiric blood product administration in liver transplant surgery

Massive blood loss has been a dreaded complication of liver transplantation, and the accompanying transfusion is associated with adverse outcomes in the form of decreased patient and graft survival. With advances in both surgical techniques and anesthetic management during transplantation, blood and blood products requirements reduced significantly. However, transfusion practices vary among different centers. The altered coagulation parameters in patients with liver cirrhosis results in a state of “rebalanced hemostasis” and patients are just as likely to clot as they are to bleed. Commonly used coagulation tests do not always reflect this new state and can, therefore, be misleading. Transfusion of blood products solely to correct abnormal parameters may worsen the coagulation status, thus adversely affecting patient outcome. Point-of-care tests such as thromboelastometry more reliably predict the risk of bleeding in these patients and in addition may provide quicker turnaround times compared to routine tests. Perioperative management should also include the possibility of thrombosis in these patients, and the use of low-molecular-weight heparin correlates with better patient survival. This review article aims to highlight the concept of rebalanced hemostasis, limitation of routine coagulation tests, and harmful effect of empiric transfusion of blood products.

Coagulation pattern in critical liver dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the current literature dealing with pathophysiology, diagnostics, bleeding management, and thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute and chronic liver dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Routine coagulation tests such as prothrombin time and International Normalized Ratio (INR) are not able to define whether a patient with critical liver dysfunction is hypocoagulable or hypercoagulable and are not able to predict the risk of bleeding in patients with liver dysfunction. Therefore, prophylactic transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and platelets in order to correct laboratory values is not appropriate. Notably, patients with liver dysfunction and increased INR are not 'autoanticoagulated'. In contrast, thrombin generation assays in the presence and absence of thrombomodulin or Protac, a snake venom that activates protein C in a manner similar to thrombomodulin, as well as viscoelastic tests (thrombelastography/thromboelastometry) indicate that patients with liver dysfunction are rather hypercoagulable with the inherent risk of thrombosis.

SUMMARY

Coagulopathy in patients with critical liver dysfunction is complex and can quickly decompensate to bleeding as well as to thrombosis. Both are associated with worse outcome. Hemostatic interventions should only be performed in case of clinically relevant bleeding and thromboprophylaxis should strongly be considered.