1
|
Al-Judaibi B, Thomas B, Wong P, Benmassaoud A, Chen JH, Dokus MK, Hussaini T, Bilodeau M, Burak KW, Marotta P, Yoshida EM. Sofosbuvir-Based Therapy in the Pre-Liver Transplant Setting: The Canadian National Experience. Ann Hepatol 2019; 17:437-443. [PMID: 29735784 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0011.7388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIM Sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimen has been shown to have high efficacy even in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Treated patients may experience various degrees of hepatic recovery ranging from stabilization of liver function, to removal from liver transplant wait lists. The frequency of these occurrences in larger transplant eligible patient populations is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of SOF-based therapy in HCV infected transplant eligible patients and to evaluate short term changes in liver function and the effect on their liver transplant status. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective multicenter Canadian study of liver transplant candidates with advanced HCV cirrhosis treated with SOF-based therapy. Outcomes included sustained virologic response (SVR), and liver transplant status. RESULTS 105 liver transplant candidates with advanced liver disease due to HCV were evaluated. The overall SVR was 83.8%. Hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed in 39 (37.1%) prior to transplant evaluation. In short term follow-up, 14 (13.3%) remained active on the list at the time of SVR12, 22 (20.9%) patients underwent liver transplantation, 7 (6.6%) patients were deactivated due to clinical improvement, 3 patients were delisted, and 10 deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS SOF-based therapy for patients progressing to liver transplantation leads to high SVR rates, short term stability in liver function, and deactivation from the transplant list .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bandar Al-Judaibi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Benson Thomas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Philip Wong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Amine Benmassaoud
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jo-Hua Chen
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M Katherine Dokus
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | - Trana Hussaini
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Marc Bilodeau
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kelly W Burak
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paul Marotta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Eric M Yoshida
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The hepatitis C virus (HCV) has a significant medical and economic impact on societies around the world, and it has been estimated that 130-180 million people are infected with HCV. Therapies for HCV are currently undergoing a revolution. In recent years, several new treatments have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, and many other treatments are in phase II or III clinical trials, including direct antiviral agents (DAAs). Due to recent major advances in the field of HCV therapy, a summary of findings on new HCV therapies are provided in this review article, including reports on new DAAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bandar Al-Judaibi
- Department of Medicine, Multi-Organ Transplant Unit, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Habib S, Meister E, Habib S, Murakami T, Walker C, Rana A, Shaikh OS. Slower Fibrosis Progression Among Liver Transplant Recipients With Sustained Virological Response After Hepatitis C Treatment. Gastroenterology Res 2015; 8:237-246. [PMID: 27785303 PMCID: PMC5051041 DOI: 10.14740/gr686w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The natural course of hepatic fibrosis in HCV allograft recipients with sustained virological response (SVR) after anti-HCV therapy remains debatable. The aim of this study was to examine the progression of fibrosis in a cohort of patients who achieved SVR compared with those without treatment. Methods The 167 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were chosen from a transplant database. All patients were required to have histological evidence of recurrent HCV infection post-liver transplantation and a follow-up biopsy. The 140 of these patients had received anti-viral therapy. Twenty-seven patients were identified as controls and were matched with the treatment group in all respects. The patients were categorized into four groups based on treatment response: 1) no treatment (control) (n = 27); 2) non-responders (n = 81); 3) relapsers (n = 32); and 4) SVR (n = 27). The endpoint was the stage of fibrosis on the follow-up liver biopsy. Results The treated and untreated groups were similar in clinical characteristics at the time of transplantation and prior to the initiation of treatment. The 72% of the cohort showed a fibrosis progression of ≥ 1 stage; this change did not significantly differ between the patient groups. Nonetheless, the fibrosis progression rate was the highest in the untreated group and lowest in the patients who achieved SVR. A coefficient of determination was used. Improvements in fibrosis scores were found with greater treatment duration. These improvements were most evident with the achievement of SVR. Conclusions In conclusion, SVR after anti-viral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C infection post-transplantation was associated with slower fibrosis progression and significantly improved graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahid Habib
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | | | - Sana Habib
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | - Traci Murakami
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | - Courtney Walker
- Liver Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation, University of Arizona, AZ, USA
| | - Abbas Rana
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, TX, USA
| | - Obaid S Shaikh
- Division of Transplantation Surgery and Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|