Comparison of caudal analgesia between ropivacaine and ropivacaine with clonidine in children: A randomized controlled trial

Effect of caudally administered clonidine on sevoflurane induced emergence agitation—A randomized trial

Background and Aims:

Emergence agitation (EA) is an unpleasant problem encountered in children following anesthesia with Sevoflurane. We studied the effectiveness of caudal epidural block (CEB) with ropivacaine 0.2% and clonidine two microgram per kilogram (mcg/kg) on the incidence of EA, with respiratory depression and hemodynamic variables as secondary end points.

Material and Methods:

Ninety children aged one to eight years undergoing infra umbilical surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups. Group RS: Ropivacaine 0.2% one ml/kg + . Saline one ml and Group RC: Ropivacaine 0.2% one ml/kg + Clonidine two mcg/kg made to one ml. They were then administered general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation followed by CEB using test drugs. Post surgery, EA was evaluated by Modified Richmond Agitation Scale at 15-minute intervals for one hour. The results were then analyzed using mean and standard deviation (SD), Chi square test, and Independent t test.

Results:

EA was significantly lower in group RC when compared to group RS (P < 0.0001). Group RC had 12 (28.5%) children with EA at 15 minutes compared to 35 (83.3%) children in Group RS. At 30 minutes, it was seen in five (11.3%) and 27 (64.2%) children in group RC and RS, respectively. No significant respiratory depression was noted in both groups. A significant decrease in heart rate was seen in Group RC (P < 0.001) but was not significant clinically. No adverse events were recorded in both the groups.

Conclusion:

Addition of clonidine (2mcg/kg) to ropivacaine 0.2% offers an advantage over 0.2% ropivacaine alone in decreasing the incidence of sevoflurane induced EA in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery without any adverse effects.

A Prospective Double-Blind Comparative Clinical Study Between Caudal Levobupivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine and Ropivacaine (0.125%) with Clonidine on Post-Operative Analgesia in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgery

Introduction

Caudal epidural block is a reliable technique in paediatric patients but associated with various complications especially with higher concentration of drugs. We proposed a comparative study between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine at low concentration (0.125%) with clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) taken as adjuvant. We aimed to see duration of post-operative analgesia, degree of motor blockade and other associated complications.

Materials and Methods

Eighty paediatric patients (1-6 years), American society of anaesthesiologists grade I and II, undergoing infra-umbilical surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. Group A patients were given caudal levobupivacaine (0.125%) and Group B patients were given caudal ropivacaine (0.125%). Clonidine (1 mcg/kg) was taken as adjuvant in both the groups. Post-operative pain, sedation and motor blockade were assessed at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours using Observational Pain Scale, modified Bromage Scale and four-point sedation score, respectively. Any other complications were also noted.

Results

Motor blockade was not associated with any of the patients. Duration of post-operative sedation was similar in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (p < 0.0001). Adverse effects and complications were negligible in both the groups.

Conclusion

Both levobupivacaine and ropivacaine can be used safely at low concentration (0.125%) taking clonidine at low dose (1 mcg/kg) as adjuvant in paediatric caudal epidural block without significant motor blockade and other complications, duration of post-operative analgesia being significantly higher in the levobupivacaine group.

Postoperative pain management in children: Guidance from the pain committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative)

The main remit of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA) Pain Committee is to improve the quality of pain management in children. The ESPA Pain Management Ladder is a clinical practice advisory based upon expert consensus to help to ensure a basic standard of perioperative pain management for all children. Further steps are suggested to improve pain management once a basic standard has been achieved. The guidance is grouped by the type of surgical procedure and layered to suggest basic, intermediate, and advanced pain management methods. The committee members are aware that there are marked differences in financial and personal resources in different institutions and countries and also considerable variations in the availability of analgesic drugs across Europe. We recommend that the guidance should be used as a framework to guide best practice.

Comparative Study of Clonidine with Ropivacaine versus Ropivacaine Alone in Epidural Anesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery

Background:

Epidural anesthesia has been well established as a safe and effective technique not only for perioperative anesthesia but also for postoperative analgesia. Various adjuvants have been added to local anesthetic agent in an effort to prolong this duration.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the anesthesia and analgesic property of ropivacaine to its combination with clonidine for lower limb orthopedic surgery under epidural.

Materials and Methods:

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, eighty adult patients undergoing lower limb surgeries received either 0.75% ropivacaine or 75 μg clonidine with 0.75% ropivacaine through epidural route. Patients were compared for hemodynamic variability, quality of motor and sensory block, intra- and post-operative analgesia, and the side effects associated.

Statistical Analysis:

Data analysis was done by Student's paired t-test, Chi-square test, and Mann–Whitney test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

The time taken for onset of the motor as well as the sensory block was significantly shorter in ropivacaine with clonidine group as compared to ropivacaine alone group. Mean duration of analgesia was significantly higher in patients who received clonidine as an adjunct (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference observed in the incidence of hemodynamic changes or side effects.

Conclusion:

The study demonstrated that use of clonidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine through epidural route provides a hemodynamically stable, faster, and prolonged epidural block and a longer analgesic effect as compared to ropivacaine alone.

Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends

Although beneficial in acute and chronic pain management, the use of local anaesthetics is limited by its duration of action and the dose dependent adverse effects on the cardiac and central nervous system. Adjuvants or additives are often used with local anaesthetics for its synergistic effect by prolonging the duration of sensory-motor block and limiting the cumulative dose requirement of local anaesthetics. The armamentarium of local anesthetic adjuvants have evolved over time from classical opioids to a wide array of drugs spanning several groups and varying mechanisms of action. A large array of opioids ranging from morphine, fentanyl and sufentanyl to hydromorphone, buprenorphine and tramadol has been used with varying success. However, their use has been limited by their adverse effect like respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritus, especially with its neuraxial use. Epinephrine potentiates the local anesthetics by its antinociceptive properties mediated by alpha-2 adrenoreceptor activation along with its vasoconstrictive properties limiting the systemic absorption of local anesthetics. Alpha 2 adrenoreceptor antagonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine are one of the most widely used class of local anesthetic adjuvants. Other drugs like steroids (dexamethasone), anti-inflammatory agents (parecoxib and lornoxicam), midazolam, ketamine, magnesium sulfate and neostigmine have also been used with mixed success. The concern regarding the safety profile of these adjuvants is due to its potential neurotoxicity and neurological complications which necessitate further research in this direction. Current research is directed towards a search for agents and techniques which would prolong local anaesthetic action without its deleterious effects. This includes novel approaches like use of charged molecules to produce local anaesthetic action (tonicaine and n butyl tetracaine), new age delivery mechanisms for prolonged bioavailability (liposomal, microspheres and cyclodextrin systems) and further studies with other drugs (adenosine, neuromuscular blockers, dextrans).

Postoperative analgesia in children when using clonidine in addition to fentanyl with bupivacaine given caudally

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of clonidine in association with fentanyl as an additive to bupivacaine 0.25% given via single shot caudal epidural in pediatric patients for postoperative pain relief. In the present prospective randomized double blind study, 40 children of ASA-I-II aged 1-5 years scheduled for infraumblical surgical procedures were randomly allocated to two groups to receive either bupivacaine 0.25% (1 ml/kg) with fentanyl 1 μg/kg and clonidine 1μg/kg (group I) or bupivacaine 0.25% (1 ml/kg) with fentanyl 1 μg/kg (group II). Caudal block was performed after the induction of general anesthesia. Postoperatively patients were observed for analgesia, sedation, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects or complications. Both the groups were similar with respect to patient and various block characteristics. Heart rate and blood pressure were not different in 2 groups. Significantly prolonged duration of post-operative analgesia was observed in group I (P<0.05). Side effects such as respiratory depression, vomiting and bradycardia were similar in both groups. The adjunction of clonidine to fentanyl as additives to bupivacaine in single shot caudal epidural in children may provide better and longer analgesia after infraumblical surgical procedures.

Optimum Concentration of Caudal Ropivacaine & Clonidine - A Satisfactory Analgesic Solution for Paediatric Infraumbilical Surgery Pain

INTRODUCTION

Ropivacaine is amide local anaesthetic pure S(-)enantiomer of bupivacaine. Its duration of analgesia is similar to that of Bupivacaine (in equivalent doses) but the motor block is slower in onset, less intense, shorter in duration for a given level of sensory block with lesser cardiac side effects but addition of an adjuvant like clonidine which is an imidazoline derivative has been studied for its sedative, anxiolytic and analgesic properties.

AIM

This study was aimed to show the optimum concentrations of Ropivacaine and Clonidine to maximize analgesia without side effects by evaluating its safety and efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty children aged 2-10 years of ASA grade 1, scheduled to undergo infraumbilical surgeries were randomly allocated to Group A & Group B of 30 each. Group A received 0.2% Ropivacaine with normal saline and Group B received 0.2% Ropivacaine and preservative free Clonidine 1μg/kg, the total volume of solution being 1ml/kg haemodynamic changes were monitored intraoperatively and haemodynamic parameters along with motor blockade, pain score and sedation score were assessed postoperatively.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Done with unpaired student t and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable regarding demographic characterstics. The mean duration of analgesia was prolonged in group B (12+2.22 hours) than in group A (6.53+1.16 hours) with p-value <0.001 leading to less rescue analgesia in former group. None of the children in the groups had a pain score of ≥ 4 at the end of 2 hours. A 6.6% and 60% of group A children had score of ≥ 4 at the end of 4(th) & 6(th) hour respectively. None in Group B had a score of ≥ 4. At the end of 8(th) hour, only 6.6% of the children in Group B had a pain score of ≥ 4 whereas it was 33.33% in Group A which is statistically significant. No bradycardia or hypotension and no significant sedation.

CONCLUSION

Combination of Ropivacaine and Clonidine in the concentration used (0.2% ropivacaine and 1μg/kg of clonidine) can be optimal for postoperative analgesia in paediatric population.

Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl for caudal epidural in pediatric surgery

CONTEXT

Ropivacaine, s-enantiomer of amide local anaesthetic produces differential neural blockade with less motor blockade, cardiovascular and neurological toxicity makes it suitable for day case surgery in children.

AIMS

To compare the effectiveness of Inj. Ropivacaine (0.2 or 0.25%) or Inj. Bupivacaine (0.25%) with fentanyl in caudal block for intra and postoperative analgesia.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Double blind retrospective randomized study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the patients (n=112) varying from age group 3.02 ± 3.29 years belonging to ASA I-IV were randomly allocated to receive caudal analgesia Group BF inj. Bupivacaine (0.25%, 2 mg/kg) + Inj. Fentany1 μg/kg (n=70) and group RF: Inj. Ropivacaine (0.25% or 0.2%, 2 mg/kg) + inj. Fentanyl 1 μg/kg (n=42). We monitored vitals and requirement of inhalational gases inraoperatively and also observed pain by pain score (Visual Analogue Score in verbal group and Objective Pain Scale in nonverbal group) and vitals postoperatively. We used rescue analgesics (inj. Paracetamol 5 mg/kg iv) when VAS score ≥4.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Student's t-test.

RESULTS

Duration of analgesia was prolonged in both group RF and BF. Time for first rescue analgesic for group RF (6.1 ± 1.1 hr) compared to group BF (5.6 ± 0.9 hr). Haemodynamic stability and less requirement of inhalation agent intraoperatively with group RF than others.

CONCLUSIONS

Ropivacaine with Fentanyl found to be better combination for pediatric surgeries for below umbilical surgeries as an adjuvant to general anaesthesia or sole technique with chances of less complication with high success rate.

A comparative study in the post-operative spine surgeries: Epidural ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with clonidine for post-operative analgesia

BACKGROUND

Anaesthesia for spine surgeries is not only concerned with relieving pain during surgeries but also during the post-operative period. A prospective randomised study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of epidural route and to compare the efficacy and clinical profile of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine, in epidural analgesia with special emphasis on their quality of analgesia and the ability to provide the smooth post-operative course.

METHODS

A total of 60 subjects, 33 were men and 27 were women between the age of 18 and 65 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I/II class who underwent spine surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups, ropivacaine + dexmedetomidine (RD) and ropivacaine + clonidine (RC), comprising 30 patients each. Group RD received 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine while group RC received 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/kg of clonidine through the epidural catheter. Onset of analgesia, time of peak effect, duration of analgesia, cardiorespiratory parameters, side-effects and need of rescue intravenous (IV) analgesics were observed.

RESULTS

The demographic profile and ASA class were comparable between the groups. None of the patients needed rescue analgesics in either group. Group RD had early onset, early peak effect, prolonged duration and stable cardiorespiratory parameters when compared with group RC. The side-effects profile was also comparable with a little higher incidence of nausea and dry mouth in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Epidural route provided acceptable analgesia in spine surgeries and avoided the need of IV analgesics in either group. Dexmedetomidine is a better neuraxial adjuvant compared with clonidine for providing early onset and prolonged post-operative analgesia and stable cardiorespiratory parameters.