Is there an optimal mode of ventilation following cardiac surgery?

Comparison of intraoperative volume and pressure-controlled ventilation modes in patients who undergo open heart surgery

Respiratory problems occur more frequently in patients who undergo open heart surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative ventilation strategies can prevent these complications and reduce mortality. We hypothesized that PCV would have better effects on gas exchange, lung mechanics and hemodynamics compared to VCV in CABG surgery. Our primary outcome was to compare the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio. Patients were randomized into two groups, (VCV, PCV) consisting of 30 individuals each. Two patients were excluded from the study. I/E ratio was adjusted to 1:2 and, RR:10/min fresh air gas flow was set at 3L/min in all patients. In the VCV group TV was set at 8 mL/kg of the predicted body weight. In the PCV group, peak inspiratory pressure was adjusted to the same tidal volume with the VCV group. PaO2/FiO2 was found to be higher with PCV at the end of the surgery. Time to extubation and ICU length of stay was shorter with PCV. Ppeak was similar in both groups. Pplateau was lower and Pmean was higher at the and of the surgery with PCV compared to VCV. The hemodynamic effects of both ventilation modes were found to be similar. PVC may be preferable to VCV in patients who undergo open heart surgery. However, it would be convenient if our findings are supported by similar studies.

Analysis of Complaints from Patients During Mechanical Ventilation After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed major complaints from patients during mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery and identified the most common complaints to reduce adverse psychologic responses.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

A single tertiary university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with heart disease who were on mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery (N = 800).

INTERVENTIONS

The major complaints of the patients during mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery were analyzed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients' comfort was evaluated using a visual analog scale, and the factors affecting comfort were analyzed. The average visual analog scale score in all patients was 5.8±2.0, and most patients presented moderate discomfort. The factors affecting comfort included dry mouth, thirst, tracheal intubation, aspiration of sputum, communication barriers, limited mobility, fear/anxiety, patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, and poor environmental conditions. Of these factors, 8 were independent predictors of the visual analog scale score. Patients considered mechanical ventilation to be the worst part of their hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The study identified 8 independent factors causing discomfort in patients during mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery. Clinicians should take appropriate measures and implement nursing interventions to reduce suffering, physical and psychologic trauma, and adverse psychologic responses and to promote recovery.