Targeting calcium signaling in Alzheimer's disease: challenges and promising therapeutic avenues

Exploration of the shared gene signatures and molecular mechanisms between Alzheimer's disease and intracranial aneurysm

Although Alzheimer's disease (AD) and intracranial aneurysm (IA) were two different types of diseases that occurred in the brain, ruptured IA (RIA) survivors may experience varying degrees of cognitive dysfunction. Neither AD nor IA is easily recognizable by an early onset so that the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes would be on the rise. Therefore, we focused on the exploration of the shared genes and molecular mechanisms between AD and IA, which would be significant for the efficiency of co-screening and co-diagnosis. Two GEO datasets were selected for the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differentially expressed gene screening, obtaining 78 overlapped genes. Next, 9 hub genes were identified by the protein-protein interaction network, including PIK3CA, GAB1, IGF1R, PLCB1, PGR, PDGFRB, PLCE1, FGFR3, and SYNJ1. The interactions among the hub genes, miRNA, and TFs were also explored. Meanwhile, we performed GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses for the results of WGCNA and hub genes, which showed that the Ras signaling and Rap1 signaling were the main shared pathogenesis. In conclusion, the present bioinformatics analysis revealed that AD and IA had the shared genes and molecular mechanisms, and these outcomes were associated with inflammation and calcium homeostasis, which could provide research clues for further studies.

Comparative efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of donanemab, lecanemab, aducanumab and lithium on cognitive function in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The comparative clinical utility of the disease-modifying treatments for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease that are approved or under review by the Food and Drug Administration (i.e., donanemab, lecanemab and aducanumab), and lithium, which is a potential disease-modifying agent for this condition, remains elusive.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the efficacy on cognitive decline, tolerability and acceptability of these drugs in this condition.

METHODS

We systematically searched in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINHAL and ClinicalTrials,gov for randomized controlled trials from their inception to 7 November 2023, and then performed a random-effect network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis included 8 randomized placebo-controlled trials with 6547 participants. On the Mini-Mental State Examination, lithium significantly outperformed donanemab, aducanumab and placebo. On the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, the efficacy of all active drugs was significantly higher than placebo. In addition, in the Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes, the efficacy of donanemab and lecanemab was significantly higher than placebo. Compared to placebo, donanemab and lecanemab were significantly less acceptable and tolerable. Aducanumab was also less well tolerated compared to placebo. There were no significant differences in the other comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Although it is yet to be determined which is more effective between lithium or lecanemab or donanemab, lithium may be more effective than aducanumab. Aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab do not appear to differ in their effectiveness on cognitive function. Low-dose lithium may be safer than aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab.