Reconstruction of mandibular defects using synthetic octacalcium phosphate combined with bone matrix gelatin in rat model

ATF2-driven osteogenic activity of enoxaparin sodium-loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in femoral defect regeneration

BACKGROUND

Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement loaded with enoxaparin sodium (PMMA@ES) has been increasingly highlighted to affect the bone repair of bone defects, but the molecular mechanisms remain unclear. We addressed this issue by identifying possible molecular mechanisms of PMMA@ES involved in femoral defect regeneration based on bioinformatics analysis and network pharmacology analysis.

METHODS

The upregulated genes affecting the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were selected through bioinformatics analysis, followed by intersection with the genes of ES-induced differentiation of BMSCs identified by network pharmacology analysis. PMMA@ES was constructed. Rat primary BMSCs were isolated and cultured in vitro in the proliferation medium (PM) and osteogenic medium (OM) to measure alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, mineralization of the extracellular matrix, and the expression of RUNX2 and OCN using gain- or loss-of-function experiments. A rat femoral bone defect model was constructed to detect the new bone formation in rats.

RESULTS

ATF2 may be a key gene in differentiating BMSCs into osteoblasts. In vitro cell assays showed that PMMA@ES promoted the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by increasing ALP activity, extracellular matrix mineralization, and RUNX2 and OCN expression in PM and OM. In addition, ATF2 activated the transcription of miR-335-5p to target ERK1/2 and downregulate the expression of ERK1/2. PMMA@ES induced femoral defect regeneration and the repair of femoral defects in rats by regulating the ATF2/miR-335-5p/ERK1/2 axis.

CONCLUSION

The evidence provided by our study highlighted the ATF2-mediated mechanism of PMMA@ES in the facilitation of the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and femoral defect regeneration.

Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview

The state-of-the-art approach to regenerating different tissues and organs is tissue engineering which includes the three parts of stem cells (SCs), scaffolds, and growth factors. Cellular behaviors such as propagation, differentiation, and assembling the extracellular matrix (ECM) are influenced by the cell's microenvironment. Imitating the cell's natural environment, such as scaffolds, is vital to create appropriate tissue. Craniofacial tissue engineering refers to regenerating tissues found in the brain and the face parts such as bone, muscle, and artery. More biocompatible and biodegradable scaffolds are more commensurate with tissue remodeling and more appropriate for cell culture, signaling, and adhesion. Synthetic materials play significant roles and have become more prevalent in medical applications. They have also been used in different forms for producing a microenvironment as ECM for cells. Synthetic scaffolds may be comprised of polymers, bioceramics, or hybrids of natural/synthetic materials. Synthetic scaffolds have produced ECM-like materials that can properly mimic and regulate the tissue microenvironment's physical, mechanical, chemical, and biological properties, manage adherence of biomolecules and adjust the material's degradability. The present review article is focused on synthetic materials used in craniofacial tissue engineering in recent decades.

Favorable osteogenic activity of iron doped in silicocarnotite bioceramic: In vitro and in vivo Studies

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The translational potential of this article

Cutting Edge Endogenous Promoting and Exogenous Driven Strategies for Bone Regeneration

Bone damage leading to bone loss can arise from a wide range of causes, including those intrinsic to individuals such as infections or diseases with metabolic (diabetes), genetic (osteogenesis imperfecta), and/or age-related (osteoporosis) etiology, or extrinsic ones coming from external insults such as trauma or surgery. Although bone tissue has an intrinsic capacity of self-repair, large bone defects often require anabolic treatments targeting bone formation process and/or bone grafts, aiming to restore bone loss. The current bone surrogates used for clinical purposes are autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic bone grafts, which although effective imply a number of limitations: the need to remove bone from another location in the case of autologous transplants and the possibility of an immune rejection when using allogeneic or xenogeneic grafts. To overcome these limitations, cutting edge therapies for skeletal regeneration of bone defects are currently under extensive research with promising results; such as those boosting endogenous bone regeneration, by the stimulation of host cells, or the ones driven exogenously with scaffolds, biomolecules, and mesenchymal stem cells as key players of bone healing process.