Factors prognosticating the outcome of decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury: A Malaysian experience

Optic nerve sheath diameter and eyeball transverse diameter in severe head injury and its correlation with intracranial pressure

BACKGROUND

Gold standard for determining intracranial pressure (ICP), intraventricular catheter, is invasive with associated risks. Non-invasive investigations like magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography have demonstrated correlation between optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and raised ICP. However, computed tomography (CT) is accessible and less operator-dependent. Literature shows variable results regarding correlations between ICP and ONSD on CT. The study aimed to investigate correlations between raised ICP and ONSD, eyeball transverse diameter (ETD), and ONSD/ETD ratios on CT scan(s) of severe head injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a three-year prospectively-maintained database of severe traumatic head injuries in patients who had ICP measurements and CT scans was conducted. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), ICP, ONSD 3 mm and 9 mm behind the globe, ETD, ONSD/ETD ratios, CT Marshall Grade, and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) were recorded. Statistical analysis assessed correlations between ICP and CT measurements.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were assessed; mortality rate: 36.5 %. Assault (48.6 %) and pedestrian-vehicle collisions (21.6 %) were the most common mechanisms. CT Marshall Grade correlated significantly with 3 mm and 9 mm ONSD, ONSD/ETD ratios, GCS, and GCS motor score, which correlated significantly with GOS. No significant correlation was found between ICP and ONSD, ETD or ONSD/ETD ratios. Marshall Grade was not significantly associated with ICP measurements but correlated with injury severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike previous studies, our study not only investigated the correlation between ICP and single variables (ONSD and ETD) but also the ONSD/ETD ratios. No correlations were observed between raised ICP and ONSD, ETD or ONSD/ETD ratio on CT in neurotrauma patients.

The Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in Limited Resource Environments

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical procedure useful to prevent and manage the impact of high intracranial pressure (ICP) that leads to brain herniation and brain's tissue ischemia. In well-resourced environment this procedure has been proposed as a last tier therapy when ICP is not controlled by medical therapies in the management of different neurosurgical emergencies like traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, infectious diseases, hydrocephalus, tumors, etc. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss the role of DC in areas of low neurosurgical and neurocritical care resources. We performed a literature review with a specific search strategy in web repositories and some local and regional journals from Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). The most common publications include case reports, case series and observational studies describing the benefits of the procedure on different pathologies but with several types of biases due to the absence of robust studies or clinical registries analysis in these kinds of environments.

Target-controlled Infusion Propofol Versus Sevoflurane Anaesthesia for Emergency Traumatic Brain Surgery: Comparison of the Outcomes

Background

The choice of anaesthetic techniques is important for the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) emergency surgery. The objective of this study was to compare patient outcomes for target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia.

Methods

A total of 110 severe TBI patients, aged 18-60, who underwent emergency brain surgery were randomised into Group T (TCI) (n = 55) and Group S (sevoflurane) (n = 55). Anaesthesia was maintained in Group T with propofol target plasma concentration of 3-6 μg/mL and in Group S with minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane 1.0-1.5. Both groups received TCI remifentanil 2-8 ng/mL for analgesia. After the surgery, patients were managed in the intensive care unit and were followed up until discharge for the outcome parameters.

Results

Demographic characteristics were comparable in both groups. Differences in Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at discharge were not significant between Group T and Group S (P = 0.25): the percentages of mortality (GOS 1) [27.3% versus 16.4%], vegetative and severe disability (GOS 2-3) [29.1% versus 41.8%] and good outcome (GOS 4-5) [43.6% versus 41.8%] were comparable in both groups. There were no significant differences in other outcome parameters.

Conclusion

TCI propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia were comparable in the outcomes of TBI patients after emergency surgery.