Nuss procedure: Technical modifications to ease bending of the support bar and lateral stabilizer placement

Customized Two-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Preoperative Pectus Bar Shaping

INTRODUCTION

Successful minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum relies on a pectus bar that closely conforms to the desired shape of the sternum and ribs to produce optimal elevation and remodeling. However, the present method of empirical intraoperative bar shaping is tedious and risks trauma to surrounding structures. To overcome this, we devised a technique using a life-sized computed tomography (CT) printout of the patient's chest wall to guide preoperative bar bending.

METHODS

A 5-cm-wide polymethylmethacrylate block placed on the sternum as the patient underwent chest CT was used as a marker to guide scaling of an axial screenshot of the patient's chest to life-size. This life-size image was printed and the planned correction of the patient's chest wall was traced onto it. The pectus bar was bent according to this template. Patient demographics, Haller index, surgical indications, operative technique, complications, aesthetic and functional improvements, and overall satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (4 women) underwent primary minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum with a single pectus bar shaped preoperatively over an 8-year period. The average age and Haller index was 20.6 years and 5.4, respectively. The mean operative time was 66.4 minutes. Satisfactory sternal elevation was attained with a single attempt at bar insertion in all cases. Two patients had pneumothoraxes that resolved without intervention. The mean follow-up period was 50.1 months. There were no cases of bar migration or recurrence of deformity after bar removal. On a 5-point Likert scale, all patients indicated an improvement in aesthetic appearance (4.6), and patients with physical symptoms (10) reported an improvement in function (4.4). The overall satisfaction score was 4.7.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique of CT-guided preoperative pectus bar shaping is straightforward, eliminates the need for intraoperative revisions to bar shape, and achieves effective correction of the pectus excavatum deformity. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic, functional, and overall outcomes.

The effectiveness of double-bar correction for pectus excavatum: A comparison between the parallel bar and cross-bar techniques

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness between parallel bar and cross-bar techniques for treating pectus excavatum.

Methods

A total of 80 patients who underwent parallel bar insertion (group 1) or cross-bar insertion (group 2) were evaluated retrospectively. From the pre- and post-operative chest CT images, vertebral-level-specific pectus indices were defined as the ratio of the maximum transverse diameter to the anteroposterior diameter of the thoracic cavity at a specific vertebral level and measured at 3 levels up (3Up-PI, 2Up-PI, 1Up-PI) and 1 vertebral level down (1Down-PI) from the narrowest point. The effectiveness of double-bar correction was compared between the 2 groups using postoperative vertebral level-specific pectus index changes.

Results

A total of 44 patients were enrolled in group 1, and 36 patients were enrolled in group 2. Preoperative pectus index values were not different between the 2 groups (4.5 ± 1.0 vs. 4.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.135). After double-bar correction, pectus index significantly decreased in both groups. There were no differences in postoperative pectus indices between the 2 groups (2.7 ± 0.4 vs. 2.6 ± 0.3, P = 0.197). Postoperative changes in 3Up-PI, 2Up-PI, and 1Up-PI were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). However, postoperative changes at the narrowest level and at 1Down-PI were significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 (1.78 ± 0.85 vs. 2.32 ± 1.44, P = 0.009; 1.21 ± 0.70 vs. 1.70 ± 1.20, P = 0.009, respectively).

Conclusions

Double-bar correction appears to be effective for treating pectus excavatum. The cross-bar insertion technique might be superior to the parallel bar insertion technique for correcting a wider range of deformities, especially at the lower part of the depression.

A new type of forceps for stabilizer removal after NUSS procedure

This paper describes the design and application of a new type of forceps for stabilizer removal after NUSS procedure. The forceps are made up of two strips of streamline forceps, which is composed of forceps handle and forceps head. One forceps head was designed as "Y" shaped, with an "L" shaped convex teeth set on each tip. It protrudes a small cylinder on the end platform of the other forceps head. Compared to the traditional operation method, with utilization of the forceps for stabilizer removal, it is expected that the operation time will be shortened and the bleeding will be reduced. The clinical application showed a good value of using the forceps in stabilizer removal after NUSS procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.