Factors associated with the reporting of adverse drug reactions by health workers in nnewi Nigeria

Trends in Adverse Event Reporting Before and After the Introduction of the Med Safety App in Nigeria

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous reporting of adverse events (AEs) is a mainstay of pharmacovigilance, and an ongoing challenge is how to ensure that more high-quality reports are collected for comprehensive information provision. The Med Safety App, a smartphone-based application, was launched in Nigeria in November 2020 to provide an electronic platform for users to seamlessly report AEs. There has been a paucity of evidence on the use of this application or other mobile applications for reporting adverse drug reactions/AEs following immunization in the Nigerian environment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in adverse event reporting before and after the introduction of the Med Safety App in Nigeria.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study using data from the VigiFlow database to compare adverse event reporting in Nigeria before and after the deployment of the Med Safety App. The baseline period was 1st April 2019 to 30th October 2020 and the comparison period was 1st November 2020 to 31st May 2022. We used Vigilance Hub, the back-end system for the Med Safety App, to extract data on App downloads and de-identified user statistics. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics, frequencies and proportions. Quality was assessed by assigning a completeness score to each individual case safety report. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for differences in medians between groups.

RESULTS

Following deployment of the App, the Nigerian National Pharmacovigilance Centre recorded an increase in the total number of adverse event reports received in VigiFlow, from 2051 in the baseline period to 18,995 following deployment of the App, with 81.7% of those reported via the Med Safety App. There was a reduction in the proportion of paper-based reporting from 98.4 to 15.7% post-deployment, and direct reporting by consumers increased from 2.7 to 17.6%. Of the 15,526 reports submitted via the App, 15,111 (97.3%) had a completeness score above 70% and 6993 (45%) had a completeness score of 100%. The median completeness score of adverse event reports on the Med Safety App was 6 out of 7. On bivariate analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test, there was an association between means of reporting and completeness score, and this association was significant, with a p value of 0.0001, which may reflect the validation rules that are applied within the App.

CONCLUSION

Deployment of the Med Safety App increased both the number and quality of adverse event reports; however, more awareness and capacity building are needed to strengthen and sustain reporting on the tool by all categories of healthcare professionals and consumers/patients.

Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reaction among health professionals in Ghana

Background

Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADR) is an effective means of ensuring postmarketing surveillance of drugs, and health professionals play a cardinal role through voluntary reporting of ADR. However, the pharmacovigilance system in Ghana is plagued with under-reporting issues, which is of public health concern.

Method

A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study involving 268 health professionals at Kpone-Katamanso District was carried out. Data on spontaneous reporting of ADR, demographics of participants, knowledge, and attitudes of professionals towards reporting and factors that may influence ADR reporting were collected. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of the independent variables with spontaneous reporting of ADR.

Result

Overall, 77.6% (208) of the 268 respondents had observed ADR; however, only 17.3% of the respondents had ever reported an ADR to the Ghana FDA. Health professionals who had average knowledge on spontaneous reporting of ADR were 51.9%, while 30.3% had good knowledge of spontaneous reporting of ADR. After adjustment on potential confounding variables (Knowledge, Feedback from FDA, Uncertainty about cause of ADR, Severity of ADR), Age (AOR = 2.26, 95%CI = 1.25–4.10), Fear of Legal Consequences (AOR = 0.15, 95%CI = 0.41–0.51), Time Constraint (AOR = 0.3, 95%CI = 0.10–0.91), Pharmacovigilance training (AOR = 18.78, 95%CI = 5.46–64.59) and Unavailability of Reporting form (AOR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.09–0.88) were found to be significantly associated spontaneous reporting of ADR.

Conclusion

The proportion of health professionals in the Kpone- Katamanso District who spontaneously reported observed ADR was low though they had average knowledge about ADR reporting. This underscores the need for a policy to be implemented that makes spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reaction mandatory for health professionals.

Adverse event following vaccine surveillance in Kaduna State, Northwestern Nigeria (January 2018 -June 2019): analysis of health facility´s records

INTRODUCTION

Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI) are one of the main reasons for inadequate immunization coverage in Kaduna State, and AEFI underreporting serves as a barrier to achieving goals of global pharmaco-vigilance for vaccine. The purpose of this study is to estimate the completeness of variables in the AEFI line-listing forms, calculate AEFI reporting rates by Local Government Areas & vaccine type and profile the reported cases according to their reactions.

METHODS

we conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study of primary surveillance records. We calculated AEFI reporting rates in the State and Local Government areas and AEFI Vaccine reaction rates to the various antigens. We used Binary logistic regression to determine the association between gender and vaccine reactions.

RESULTS

seven thousand eight hundred and twenty-four (7,824) AEFI cases were reported. The completeness of variables on the filled AEFI line-list varied from 21% to 100%. The State had a high AEFI reporting rate of 9.09 per 10,000 administered doses. Fever (<38oC) was the main AEFI reaction. Severe AEFI cases accounted for only 0.89% of the total reported cases. Pentavalent vaccine was the suspect antigen responsible for the highest number of AEFI cases, with a vaccine reaction rate of 44.77 per 10,000 doses. The Zaria Local Government area had the highest AEFI reporting rate, while the Sanga Local Government area had the lowest AEFI reporting rate in the State. The difference between genders in the number of reported AEFI cases was not statistically significant (p>0.05). There were 35% higher odds of occurrence of bleeding among males than among females (aOR: 1.354; P-value: p=.012; 95% CI: 1.070-1.715; Nagelkerke-R^2-: 0.003). The other reactions were not significantly related to gender.

CONCLUSION

our study shows a higher occurrence of severe AEFI in subjects undergoing pentavalent vaccine. Thiscaused the highest incidence of AEFI. There was no significant association between gender and AEFI reactions.

Patient safety management systems and activities related to promoting voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting for patient safety issues: A cross-sectional study

Both voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting systems for patient safety issues need to work well to develop a patient safety learning system that is effective in preventing the recurrence of adverse events. Some of the hospital systems and activities may increase voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting. This study aimed to identify the hospital systems and activities that increase voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting for patient safety issues. An anonymous mail survey of hospitals in Japan was conducted in 2017. The hospitals were selected by stratified random sampling according to number of beds. The survey examined the annual number of reported events in the voluntary in-hospital reporting system for patient safety and experience of reporting unexpected patient deaths possibly due to medical interventions to the mandatory national-level reporting system in the last 2 years. The relationship of the answer to the questions with the patient safety management systems and activities at each hospital was analyzed. The response rate was 18.8% (603/3,215). The number of in-hospital reports per bed was positively related to identifying events by referring complaints or questions of patients or family members, using root cause analysis for analyzing reported events, and developing manuals or case studies based on reported events, and negatively related to the unification and standardization of medical devices and equipment. The experience with mandatory national-level reporting of serious adverse events was positively related to identifying problematic cases by a person in charge of patient safety management from the in-hospital reporting system of complications and accidental symptoms. Enhanced feedback for reporters may promote voluntary in-hospital reporting of minor cases with low litigation risks. Developing an in-hospital mechanism that examines all serious complications and accidental symptoms may promote mandatory national-level reporting of serious adverse events with high litigation risks.

Awareness and Reporting of Antiretroviral Adverse Events Among Clients and Health-Care Providers at a Referral Hospital in Moshi, Northern Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Pharmacovigilance is a means of ensuring drug safety, and thus it ensures that the risks associated with medication adminstration and consumption do not outweigh the benefits. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV care and treatment has reduced mortality and morbidity, but adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which can lead to treatment failure, remain a concern. In 2015 in Tanzania, 688,800 adults were taking ART. All health-care providers are required to report all suspected ADRs seen or reported by their patients using yellow forms available at all care and treatment centres in Tanzania. However, the actual practice of reporting is not taking place. This study aimed to explore the patients' knowledge and HIV/AIDS health-care providers' reporting of ART adverse events at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using a semi-structured questionnaire was conducted between June and July 2016 within HIV, dermatology, and infectious disease clinics at KCMC. All health-care providers providing HIV services within these clinics completed a questionnaire. Means and standard deviations were used to summarise the numerical data with normal distributions (age of patients), while numerical data that were not normally distributed (duration on ART) were summarised using medians and ranges. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarise categorical variables.

RESULTS

All 63 health-care providers agreed that ADR reporting was necessary. Forty-six (73%) were aware of the national ADR reporting system, but only 32 (50.8%) reported having received training on pharmacovigilance. Only 4 (6.3%) of all health-care providers reported always filling the ADR report forms; 27 (42.9%) rarely filled the forms, and 32 (50.8%) reported having never filled an ADR reporting form. Training on pharmacovigilance had a positive influence on ADR reporting. Lack of motivation, uncertainty about reporting procedures, lack of time, unavailability of reporting forms, and ignorance were the major factors affecting reporting among health-care providers.

CONCLUSION

The majority of health-care providers were aware of the need and importance of ADR reporting and the national pharmacovigilance system. However, ART adverse events are underreported. More effort is needed to strengthen the continuous reporting of ADRs by providing continuous education to health-care providers; this will lead to their active participation in pharmacovigilance.