Infant Hearing Screening in India: Current Status and Way Forward

Cost-effectiveness of portable-automated ABR for universal neonatal hearing screening in India

The World Health Organization considers Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) essential to global public health. Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram has included newborn hearing screening in India since 2013. The program faces human, infrastructure, and equipment shortages. First-line hearing screening with improved diagnostic accuracy is needed. The Portable Automated Auditory Brainstem Responses (P-AABR) can be used in remote areas for UNHS due to its low infrastructure needs and diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of P-AABR in UNHS. We employed an analytical model based on decision trees to assess the cost-effectiveness of Otoacoustic Emission (OAE) and P-AABR. The total cost to the health system for P-AABR, regardless of true positive cases, is INR 10,535,915, while OAE costs INR 7,256,198. P-AABR detects 262 cases, whereas OAE detects 26 cases. Portable Automated ABR costs INR 97 per case detection, while OAE costs INR 67. The final ICER was 97407.69. The P-AABR device is cost-effective, safe and feasible for UNHS Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) programs. Beyond reducing false referrals and parent indirect costs, it detects more hearing-impaired infants. Even in shortages of skilled workers, existing staff can be trained. Thus, this study suggests integrating this device into community and primary health centers to expand UNHS coverage.

Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in High-Risk Neonates at Kalaburagi Region of Northern Karnataka: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study

The study estimated the prevalence of hearing impairment in high-risk neonates and effect of high-risk factors on the hearing. A hospital-based cross sectional study was conducted on 327 neonates with high-risk factors. All the high-risk babies were screened using TEOAE and AABR followed by diagnostic ABR testing. Six (2%) of high-risk neonates were found to have bilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss. Risk factors associated with hearing impairment include multiple risk factors of Preterm delivery, hyperbilirubinemia, congenital anomalies, neonatal sepsis, viral or bacterial infection, positive family history of hearing loss and prolonged NICU stay. Further, the inclusion of AABR along with TEOAE has been shown to be a useful tool in reducing false-positive rates and identifying hearing loss.

A Study of JCIH (Joint Commission on Infant Hearing) Risk Factors for Hearing Loss in Babies of NICU and Well Baby Nursery at a Tertiary Care Center

Babies in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) have an additional risk for hearing loss due to various risk factors like, prematurity, low birth weight, mechanical ventilation, hyperbillirubinemia, ototoxic drugs, low APGAR score etc. as compared to the babies from well baby nursery (WBN) who, poses risk factors mostly family history, syndromic deafness. So the present study was aimed know the risk factors responsible for hearing loss in NICU and WBN babies and to assess the incidence of deafness. A total of 800 babies from NICU (n = 402) and WBN (n = 398) underwent hearing screening from a tertiary care center. Hearing screening was done using two staged screening protocol as per JCIH guidelines with Distortion product Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Responses (A-ABR). According to DPOAE test, 311 from NICU and 383 from WBN passed the test and during second screening, 80 out of 91 from NICU and 11 out of 13 from WBN passed the DPOAE test. Further BERA was done at the 3rd month of corrected age where 6 out of 11 showed positive responses from NICU and 3 babies from WBN had profound hearing loss. Data analysis revealed that family history of deafness, anemia and hypertension in ANC, TORCH in mother, low Apgar score and hyperbillirubinemia in newborns were a major risk factor for hearing impairment. We conclude that the diagnoses of auditory disorders at early stage due to various risk factors are important since appropriate therapeutic intervention and rehabilitation would help in better development of children.

Challenges of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in a Developing Country-a Double-Edged Sword

Objective to implement Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS) in a tertiary academic hospital and identify associated risk factors. Prospective study. Screening tests with Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE) were done among newborns, prior to hospital discharge. In babies who fail OAE twice, Brain Response Audiometry (BERA) was done, failing which they were referred to higher ENT center for repeat testing and hearing rehabilitation. A total 2323 babies were admitted in the neonatal unit during the study period. Only 773 babies (a third) could be screened for the first OAE, two thirds being lost to study right at inception!! Among the 773 neonates, in the "at risk" group of 301 neonates, 31(10%) and in the "not at risk" group of 472 neonates, 30 (6%) were lost to follow up respectively. The occurrence of hearing loss in this study population was 1.3 per 1000. Risk factors were noted in 38.9% of this subgroup with occurrence of hearing loss in "at risk" group being 3.32 per 1000. The implementation of UNHS in a developing country like India, has multiple challenges including infrastructural and non-compliance to follow up. In the meantime, the possibility of compromising 'at-risk" neonates, who are significantly more prone to hearing loss, both neonatal and delayed onset, is an additional grave reality which needs deep considerationin this Herculean task of attaining "universality".

Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in Neonates of Mothers with Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross Sectional Study

This study aims to find out the prevalence of hearing impairment in neonates of mothers with diabetes mellitus. The objective is to assess any correlation between the glycemic control and the development of neonatal hearing impairment. A total of 120 neonates of diabetic mothers were included in the study. Data was collected from hospital medical records, direct interview of parent or care taker and clinical examination of child done whenever possible. 120 Neonates were evaluated by OAE soon after birth. Those who failed the test are evaluated with BERA and results were statistically analysed. In our study prevalence of deafness in neonates of mothers with diabetes mellitus was 4.16%. Prevalence of hearing impairment was higher in neonates of mothers with pre gestational diabetes (9.09%) than gestational diabetes mellitus (3.06%). Mean of HbA1c was higher in mothers of neonates with hearing impairment than those without hearing impairment. Prevalence of deafness in neonates of mothers with diabetes mellitus was 4.16%, which is about sevena times higher than the prevalence of deafness in neonates without any risk factors. Prevalence was higher in neonates of mothers with pre gestational diabetes than neonates of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus.

A narrative review of the logistic and economic feasibility of cochlear implants in lower-income countries

Objectives: Globally, less than 1% of people who could benefit from a cochlear implant have one and the problem is particularly acute in lower-income countries. Here we give a narrative review of the economic and logistic feasibility of cochlear implant programmes in lower-income countries and discuss future developments that would enable better healthcare. We review the incidence and aetiology of hearing loss in low- and middle-income countries, screening for hearing loss, implantation criteria, issues concerning imaging and surgery, and the professional expertise required. We also review the cost of cochlear implantation and ongoing costs. Findings: The cost effectiveness of cochlear implants in lower-income countries is more limited by the cost of the device than the cost of surgery, but there are also large ongoing costs that will deter many potential users. Conclusions: We conclude that the main barriers to the future uptake of cochlear implants are likely to be logistical rather than technical and cochlear implant provision should be considered as part of a wider programme to improve the health of those with hearing loss.

Adaptation of Functioning After Pediatric Cochlear Implantation (FAPCI) into Hindi Language

FAPCI is a parent/caregiver reporting questionnaire, which evaluates the communication performance of pre-school children with cochlear implants in the age range of 2-5 years, using behavioral examples of children's daily activities. Tools for the objective and effective measurement of communication for cochlear implanted Indian children in Hindi language are lacking. The primary aim of the study was to adapt American English version of FAPCI into the Hindi language. With a secondary aim to find out the communication functioning of Cochlear implanted children by administering FAPCI (HN) and comparing the findings with children with normal hearing. The FAPCI was translated to Hindi using the forward-backward procedure. The FAPCI (HN) was then administered to the parents of children with NH (n = 35) and CI (n = 44), 2-9 years of age. Internal consistency was checked using Cronbach's alpha. Other statistical analysis included Bartlett's test of sphericity, factor loading, Wilcoxon test and t test. During adaptation few items were modified and one item was removed which contained "inversion question" not used in Hindi language. The Hindi version of FAPCI showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.90). The split-half coefficient for the first half of the data was equal to 0.96 and for the second half was equal to 0.95. The CI group had significantly lower FAPCI scores (61.14 ± 21.49) than the NH group (101.43 ± 9.24) (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon test). FAPCI-Hindi can be used to measure the communicative functioning of cochlear implanted children in Indian population and results may be used as a guideline to revise the speech and language therapy plans to maximize the cochlear implant benefits.

An Epidemiological Study on Burden of Hearing Loss and Its Associated Factors in Delhi, India

INTRODUCTION

Hearing loss is the second most common cause of years lived with disability (YLD). The present study was conducted with an objective to determine the prevalence, severity, and sociodemographic correlates of hearing loss among people aged 3 months and above in selected areas of Delhi, India.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in selected rural and urban areas of Delhi among population aged 3 months and above. Of the total sample size of 664, 85 study subjects (17 households) were taken from the rural area, and 579 (116 households) were taken from urban areas. The hearing test and ear examination was carried out using handheld oto-acoustic emission (OAE) in children <5 years of age and pure tone audiometry in individuals above 5 years of age. SPSS software was used for data analysis. Chi-square test was used to analyze difference between proportions.

RESULTS

Overall prevalence of hearing loss was 25.1%. Conductive hearing loss was present among 61 (10.3%) subjects, mixed hearing loss was found among 5 (0.8%) subjects, and sensorineural hearing loss among 94 (15.8%) subjects. On OAE, 62 (89.9%) children passed the test, and 7 (10.1%) were referred. Increasing age, female gender, and low education were significantly associated with hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

There was high prevalence of hearing loss in the study sample. Urgent interventions are required to identify individuals with hearing loss so that its serious complications can be reduced.

Outcomes of Newborn Hearing Screening Program: A Hospital Based Study

Hearing loss is hidden disability and second most common congenital pathology. Prevention, early identification and early intervention of hearing loss can prevent further disability in development of speech, language, cognition and other developmental domains. The prevalence of congenital hearing loss has been estimated to be 1.2-5.7 per thousand in neonates. In these contexts, the aim of study was to determine outcomes of neonates hearing screening program in Hospital. It is a clinical cross-sectional study which was conducted in tertiary care centre from 8th July, 2015 to 31th May, 2016. Total no of 2254 cases were screened. Details case history including high risk register, Pediatric Audiometry, Otoacoustic Emission tests were performed followed brainstem evoked response audiometry. The Prevalence of hearing loss among high risk babies confirmation by BERA was 8.8% per 1000 babies and 16 cases were recommended for Cochlear Implant. The screening protocol with objective test i.e. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission and confirmation by Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry is very useful tool in early identification of congenital hearing loss in neonates. Hence, the results of this study will be used to initiate universal newborn hearing screening in other hospitals. Moreover, this study highlights the relevance of neonatal hearing screening in other states of India and country where this screening is not performed routinely in all hospitals and creating awareness to identify neonatal risk factors associated with hearing loss and understand the importance of early identification and early intervention and among health care professionals.