Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas: Do we need to treat the dural tail? A single-center retrospective analysis and an overview of the literature

Ki-67 labeling index predicts tumor progression patterns and survival in patients with atypical meningiomas following stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

This study investigated whether Ki-67 labeling index (LI) correlated with clinical outcomes after SRS for atypical meningiomas.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 39 patients with atypical meningiomas who underwent SRS over a 10-year study period. Ki-67 LI was categorized into 3 groups: low (< 5%), intermediate (5%-10%), and high (> 10%). Local tumor control rates (LCRs), progression-free rates (PFRs), disease-specific survival (DSS) rates, and adverse radiation-induced events (AREs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up periods were 26 months. SRS was performed at a median prescription dose of 18 Gy for tumors with a median Ki-67 LI of 9.6%. The 3-year LCRs were 100%, 74%, and 25% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups, respectively (p = 0.011). The 3-year PFRs were 100%, 40%, and 0% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups (p = 0.003). The 5-year DSS rates were 100%, 89%, and 50% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups (p = 0.019). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed a significant correlation of high LI with lower LCR (hazard ratio [HR], 3.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-13.04, p = 0.026), lower PFR (HR 3.80; 95% CI 1.46-9.88, p = 0.006), and shorter DSS (HR 6.55; 95% CI 1.19-35.95, p = 0.031) compared with intermediate LI. The ARE rates were minimal (8%) in the entire group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high Ki-67 LI showed significantly more tumor progression and tumor-related death. Ki-67 LI might offer valuable predictive insights for the post-SRS management of atypical meningiomas.

Utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-MRI for Gamma Knife® stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning for meningioma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of adding 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI to standard MRI for target volume delineation in Gamma Knife® stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) for meningioma.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with 18 lesions undergoing GKSRS for WHO grade 1 meningioma were enrolled in a prospective study. All patients underwent pre-treatment 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI examination in addition to standard procedures. Five clinicians independently contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) based on standard MRI (GTVMRI) and PET/MRI (GTVPET/MRI) on separate occasions. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa statistic (CKS), Dice similarity coefficient (DC), and Hausdorff distance (HD). Statistical analysis was performed with paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

The addition of PET/MRI significantly increased GTV contour volume (mean GTVPET/MRI 3.59 cm3 versus mean GTVMRI 3.18 cm3, P = .008). Using the treating clinician's pre-treatment GTVMRI as the reference, median CKS (87.2 vs 77.5, P = .006) and DC (87.2 vs 77.4, P = .006) were significantly lower, and median HD (25.2 vs 31.0, P = .001) was significantly higher with the addition of PET/MRI. No significant difference was observed in interobserver contouring reproducibility between GTVMRI and GTVPET/MRI.

CONCLUSION

The addition of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI for target volume delineation in GKSRS for meningioma is associated with an increase in GTV volume and greater interobserver variation. PET/MRI did not affect interobserver contouring reproducibility.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study provides novel insights into the impact of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI on GTV delineation and interobserver agreement in meningioma GKSRS, highlighting its potential for improving GKSRS treatment accuracy.

Radiation of meningioma dural tail may not improve tumor control rates

Introduction

Dural tails are thickened contrast-enhancing portions of dura associated with some meningiomas. Prior studies have demonstrated the presence of tumor cells within the dural tail, however their inclusion in radiation treatment fields remains controversial. We evaluated the role of including the dural tail when treating a meningioma with stereotactic radiation and the impact on tumor recurrence.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-institution, cohort study of patients with intracranial World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 meningioma and identified dural tail who were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) from January 2012 to December 2018. SRS and FSRT subgroups were categorized based on coverage or non-coverage of the dural tail by the radiation fields, as determined independently by a radiation oncologist and a neurosurgeon. Demographics, tumor characteristics, radiation plans, and outcomes were evaluated. High grade tumors were analyzed separately.

Results

A total of 187 WHO grade 1 tumors from 177 patients were included in the study (median age: 62 years, median follow-up: 40 months, 78.1% female) with 104 receiving SRS and 83 receiving FSRT. The dural tail was covered in 141 (75.4%) of treatment plans. There was no difference in recurrence rates (RR) or time to recurrence (TTR) between non-coverage or coverage of dural tails (RR: 2.2% vs 3.5%, P = 1.0; TTR: 34 vs 36 months, P = 1.00). There was no difference in the rate of radiation side effects between dural tail coverage or non-coverage groups. These associations remained stable when SRS and FSRT subgroups were considered separately, as well as in a high grade cohort of 16 tumors.

Conclusion

Inclusion of the dural tail in the SRS or FSRT volumes for meningioma treatment does not seem to reduce recurrence rate. Improved understanding of dural tail pathophysiology, tumor grade, tumor spread, and radiation response is needed to better predict the response of meningiomas to radiotherapy.

Meningiomas

Meningiomas arise in various locations. Convexity tumors are relatively simple to remove. Skull base tumors and tumors adjacent to the major cerebral veins and venous sinuses can be very difficult to extirpate. Attempts at radical resection can lead to serious morbidity. The combination of bulk reduction using microsurgery followed by GKNS gives greatly improved survival and very low morbidity. With smaller tumors, GKNS may be used as the primary treatment. Increasing numbers of asymptomatic meningiomas are demonstrated either as an unexpected finding or as a residual or recurrent tumor after surgery. In all of these situations, GKNS gives a better result than observation or reoperation.

Radiation therapy for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: an overview of current results and controversial issues

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors. Most meningiomas are WHO grade 1 tumors whereas less than one-quarter of all meningiomas are classified as atypical (WHO grade 2) and anaplastic (WHO grade 3) tumors, based on local invasiveness and cellular features of atypia. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of meningioma therapy and represents the definitive treatment for the majority of patients; however, grade 2 and grade 3 meningiomas display more aggressive behavior and are difficult to treat. Several retrospective series have shown the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients with atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. More recently, two phase II prospective trials by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG 0539) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 2042) have confirmed the potential benefits of fractionated RT for patients with intermediate and high-risk meningiomas; however, several issues remain a matter of debate. Controversial topics include the timing of radiation treatment in patients with totally resected atypical meningiomas, the optimal radiation technique, dose and fractionation, and treatment planning/target delineation. Ongoing randomized trials are evaluating the efficacy of early adjuvant RT over observation in patients undergoing gross total resection.

WHO grade I meningiomas that show regrowth after gamma knife radiosurgery often show 1p36 loss

WHO grade I meningiomas occasionally show regrowth after radiosurgical treatment, which cannot be predicted by clinical features. There is increasing evidence that certain biomarkers are associated with regrowth of meningiomas. The aim of this retrospective study was to asses if these biomarkers could be of value to predict regrowth of WHO grade I meningiomas after additive radiosurgery. Forty-four patients with WHO grade I meningiomas who underwent additive radiosurgical treatment between 2002 and 2015 after Simpson IV resection were included in this study, of which 8 showed regrowth. Median follow-up time was 64 months (range 24–137 months). Tumors were analyzed for the proliferation marker Ki-67 by immunohistochemistry and for deletion of 1p36 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Furthermore, genomic DNA was analyzed for promoter hypermethylation of the genes NDRG1–4, SFRP1, HOXA9 and MGMT. Comparison of meningiomas with and without regrowth after radiosurgery revealed that loss of 1p36 (p = 0.001) and hypermethylation of NDRG1 (p = 0.046) were correlated with regrowth free survival. Loss of 1p36 was the only parameter that was significantly associated with meningioma regrowth after multivariate analysis (p = 0.01). Assessment of 1p36 loss in tumor tissue prior to radiosurgery might be considered an indicator of prognosis/regrowth. However, this finding has to be validated in an independent larger set of tumors.

Multiplatform Radiosurgery for Intracranial Meningiomas and Dose to the Dural Tail

Introduction

Meningiomas are extra-axial central nervous system tumors. Complete resection is often curative with macroscopically complete removal of the tumor, excision of its dural attachment, and any abnormal bone. Radiosurgery is also an option for high-risk patients or in patients with surgically residual disease. Dural tail is a typical radiological sign on contrast-enhanced MRI; it can contain tumor cells or be a reaction due to vascular congestion and edema. Radiosurgical planning treatment varies regarding the identification and coverage of the dural tail. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze a series of 143 patients with WHO Grade I meningiomas treated with different radiosurgical platforms, and dosing parameters focused on planning and dose delivery to the dural tail.

Methods

From February 2011 to July 2020, 143 patients with histologically confirmed or radiologically assumed WHO Grade I meningiomas were treated using rotating gamma-ray Infini™ (Gamma [MASEP Medical Science Technology Development Co., Shenzhen, China]), TomoTherapy® (Tomo [Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA]), and CyberKnife® (CK [Accuray Inc.]). All plans were retrospectively reviewed to establish the maximum distance (MaxDis) from the prescription dose to the end of the dural tail and the minimum dose at the dural tail (MinDoseT) at this point. We also established the midpoint distance (MPDis) from the prescription dose to MaxDis and the dose at this point (MPDose). Plans were further distinguished when the physician intended to cover the dural tail versus when not. Patients and tumor response were assessed by imaging and clinical and phone call evaluations.

Results

Of the 143 patients, 81 were treated using Gamma, 34 using Tomo, and 28 using CK. Eighty patients were eligible for follow-up, of whom 58 (72.5%) had an unmistakable dural tail sign. Median follow-up was 1,118 days (range 189-3,496), mean age was 54.5 (range 19-90), and 61 were women, and 19 were men. Overall tumor volume was 6.5 cc (range 0.2-59); mean tumor volumes by different platforms were 2.4, 9.45, and 8 cc; dose prescribed and mean tumor coverage were 14 Gy and 92%, 14.5 Gy and 95%, and 14 Gy and 95.75% with Gamma, Tomo, and CK, respectively. The dural tail was drawn and planned with an attempt to treat in 18 patients (31%); the mean MaxDis, MinDoseT, MPDis, and MPDose were 9.0 mm, 2 Gy, 4.5 mm, and 10.6 Gy, respectively. At last follow-up, tumor control was achieved in 96% of patients for the whole series, and there were no statistical variations regarding tumor volume, dose, conformality, or control when stereotactic radiosurgery was used to cover the dural tail versus when it was not (p=0.105). One patient experienced a Grade 4 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity as an adverse radiation effect that required surgery, and 11 (7.6%) experienced a Grade 1 toxicity.

Conclusions

This is our preliminary report regarding the efficacy of radiosurgery for meningiomas using diverse platforms at three years of follow-up; the results regarding tumor control are in accordance with the published literature as of this writing. A conscious pursuit of the dural tail with the prescription dose has not proven to provide better tumor control than not doing so - even small areas of the tumor uncovered by the prescription dose did not alter tumor control at current follow-up. The doses delivered to these uncovered areas are quite significant; further follow-up is necessary to validate these findings.

External beam radiation therapy for meningioma

Radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in the management of meningioma. Surgery often remains the initial treatment of choice as it reduces mass effect and confirms the diagnosis and grade. However, RT has frequently been successful in the primary setting and is commonly employed as adjuvant therapy for incompletely resected tumors as well as for high-grade meningiomas regardless of resection extent. Some meningiomas develop in locations less amenable to resection or in patients who are poor surgical candidates, in which circumstances RT is particularly appropriate as primary treatment. Recent cooperative group studies including RTOG 0539 have better established the role of RT for meningioma. These studies suggest a role for adjuvant RT for completely resected Grade II meningioma, which was less clear historically. Ongoing clinical trials such as NRG BN 003 and ROAM will further clarify this. This chapter reviews the role of fractionated external beam RT for various grades of meningioma.

Grade II meningiomas and Gamma Knife radiosurgery: analysis of success and failure to improve treatment paradigm

OBJECTIVE

Grade II meningiomas, which currently account for 25% of all meningiomas, are subject to multiple recurrences throughout the course of the disease and represent a challenge for the neurosurgeon. Radiosurgery is increasingly performed for the treatment of Grade II meningiomas and is quite efficient in controlling relapses locally at the site of the lesion, but it cannot prevent margin relapses. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the technical parameters involved in producing marginal relapses and to optimize loco-marginal control to improve therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

Eighteen patients presenting 58 lesions were treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2010 and 2015 in Hopital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière. The median patient age was 68 years (25%−75% interval: 61–72 years), and the sex ratio (M/F) was 13:5. The median delay between surgery and first GKRS was 3 years. Patients were classified as having Grade II meningioma using World Health Organization (WHO) 2007 criteria. The tumor growth rate was computed by comparing 2 volumetric measurements before treatment. After GKRS, iterative MRI, performed every 6 months, detected a relapse if tumor volume increased by more than 20%. Patterns of relapse were defined as being local, marginal, or distal. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between criterion and potential risk factors was tested by the log-rank test and univariable Cox model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months (range 8–57 months). During this period, 3 patients presented with a local relapse, 5 patients with a marginal relapse, and 7 patients with a distal relapse. Crude local control was 84.5%. The local control actuarial rate was 89% at 1 year and 71% at 3 years. The marginal control actuarial rate was 81% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years. The distal control actuarial rate was 100% at 1 year, 81% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years. Median distal control was 38 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 71% at 1 year, 36% at 2 years, and 23% at 3 years. Median PFS was 18 months. Lesions treated with a minimum radiation dose of ≤ 12 Gy had significantly more local relapses than those treated with a dose > 12 Gy (p = 0.04) in univariate analysis.

Marginal control was significantly influenced by tumor growth rate, with a lower growth rate being highly associated with improved marginal control (p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a relationship between dose and marginal control, but it was not significant (p = 0.09). PFS was significantly associated with delay between first surgery and GKRS (p = 0.03). The authors noticed few complications with no sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to optimize loco-marginal control, radiosurgical treatment should require a minimum dose of > 12 Gy and an extended target volume along the dural insertion. Ideally, these parameters should correspond to the aggressiveness of the lesion, based on genetic features of the tumor.