Arthroscopic and low-field MRI (0.25 T) evaluation of meniscus and ligaments of painful knee

Clinical Accuracy of the Lateral-Anterior Drawer Test for Diagnosing Posterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

BACKGROUND

Commonly used clinical posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tests present with diagnostic weaknesses requiring alternative clinical tests. The Lateral-Anterior Drawer test (LAD-test) is a suggested alternative that previously demonstrated concurrent validity in situ. Further in vivo LAD-test clinical accuracy examination is required prior to any recommendation for clinical adoption. Thus, this case-control study aims to (1) investigate the LAD-test's in vivo interrater and intra-rater reliability; (2) establish LAD-test concurrent validity against MRI as the reference standard; and (3) examine the correspondence between examiners' professional working experience and LAD-test diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

Three examiners with different professional experience levels, blindfolded during testing, and blinded from subjects' identity, medical history, and reference test outcome performed all LAD-testing twice per subject. Reliability analyses included percent agreement, Fleiss' kappa and Cohen's kappa coefficients with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) calculations. Validation parameters included sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR + ; LR-), and predictive values (PPV; NPV) each accompanied by 95%CIs; each tester's percent agreement with the MRI; and their Youden Index.

RESULTS

The study sample was comprised of 31 subjects of which 14 had a history of unilateral full-thickness PCL-rupture. Their 14 contralateral knees and both knees of 17 healthy subjects served as controls. In vivo LAD-test performance did not produce any negative ramifications for the tested subjects. Interrater reliability was moderate (test-1: Fleiss'κ = 0.41; 95% CI 0.40;0.41; test-2:Fleiss'κ = 0.51; 95% CI 0.50;0.51). Pairwise examiner's LAD-test outcome agreement ranged from 74 to 89%. Pairwise interrater reliability was fair-to-substantial (κ = 0.27 to κ = 0.65) with moderate-to-substantial PABAK (0.48-0.77). Intra-rater reliability was substantial-to-almost perfect (PABAK 0.65-0.97). Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 57 to 86% and 83 to 98%, respectively. The advanced and novice clinicians' Youden Indexes were acceptable. The same examiners' positive likelihood ratios revealed important and relative important effects, respectively. Positive predictive values were considerable for the advanced and novice clinicians, while negative predictive values were high for all examiners.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the study results suggested LAD-test practicability. In vivo LAD-test performance did not produce any negative ramifications for the tested subjects. In subjects presenting with a chronic PCL-deficiency (i.e., > 3 months since initial injury), the LAD-test's clinical accuracy was comparable-to-superior to other commonly used clinical PCL-tests. Future studies to establish the LAD-test's usefulness in isolation as well as in combination with other clinical tests for acute PCL-rupture diagnostics are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00013268 (09. November 2017).

Preoperative Medial Tightness and Narrow Medial Joint Space Are Predictive Factors for Lower Extremity Alignment Change Toward Varus After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Background:

Time-dependent changes in lower extremity alignment after an opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) have been poorly investigated. Moreover, few studies have investigated risk factors of postoperative alignment change.

Purposes:

To investigate time-dependent alignment changes and identify predictive factors for postoperative alignment change after OWHTO.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This study included patients who underwent OWHTO between March 2010 and September 2018. A total of 142 knees with a mean follow-up of 42 months were included and classified as the change group when the amount of hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle change was >1°; if otherwise, then as the no-change group. HKA angle was obtained at 6 time points: preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and final follow-up postoperatively. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify the factors that were correlated with the changes in the HKA angle from 3 months to the final follow-up.

Results:

Among the 142 knees, 59 (42%) were included in the change group. The overall postoperative HKA angles progressed serially toward varus after OWHTO. The mean angles of the 6 time points were 8.5°, –3.7°, –3.6°, –3.3°, –3.1°, and –2.7°, respectively. The mean HKA angles of the change and no-change groups were 9.1°, –4.3°, –3.4°, –2.8°, –2.0°, and –1.4° and 8.1°, –3.3°, –3.8°, –3.6°, –3.8°, and –3.7°, respectively. Greater change in the HKA angle was predicted by preoperatively greater valgus stress joint line convergence angles and less medial joint space width.

Conclusion:

Of the cases of OWHTO, 42% showed correction loss of >1° at a mean follow-up of 42 months. The overall postoperative HKA angles progressed serially to varus angles after OWHTO. Preoperative greater valgus stress joint line convergence angles and less medial joint space width were predictive factors for greater change in alignment toward varus after OWHTO.

Diagnostic performance of DIXON sequences on low-field scanner for the evaluation of knee joint pathology

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, there has been a growing interest in the use of Dixon sequence for knee MRI in order to save time spent on the scanner, and improving diagnostic utility. Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of Dixon sequence on low-field MRI with the proton-density sequence on high-field MRI.

METHODS

This prospective study included 40 patients who underwent 0.25T knee MRI, using the routine protocol with the addition of a sagittal 4-point Dixon sequence (SPED), and an additional sequence on 1.5T scanner, consisting in a fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo (FS PD-FSE). Two radiologists independently examined the images, evaluating the anatomic identification score and diagnostic performances of the two sequences. Interreader agreement was evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Final population counted 34 patients (36 knee MR images) with a mean age of 52.9 years (range, 18-75 years). Interreader agreement was very high except for cartilage injuries at medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau (ICC SPED: 0.757, ICC FS PD-FSE: 0.746), even if not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in mean signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), artifacts presence and diagnostic confidence between SPED and PD-FS sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

Dixon sequences on low-field scanner have a comparable diagnostic accuracy to PD-FS sequence obtained on a high field scanner for knee MR imaging. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Role of low field MRI in detecting knee lesions

Objective: The aim of this work is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 0.3T sectoral MR imaging, compared with arthroscopy, for meniscal, cruciate ligaments and chondral knee lesions. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study analyzing all the consecutive knees subjected to arthroscopy at our institution between January 2014 and June 2017 and preceded within 3 months by knee MR examination at our institution with 0.3 T equipment. Patients with history of a new trauma in the time interval between MR exam and arthroscopy were excluded from the study. Two independent experienced radiologists evaluated in double blind the MR findings of menisci, cruciate ligaments and articular cartilage. Both radiological findings were independently compared with those of the arthroscopic report considered as gold standard. For each of the examined targets we calculated the following parameters: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value; interobserver concordance statistically calculated using Cohen’s Kappa test. Results: 214 knees (95R/119L) of 214 patients (143M/71F) aged from 18 to 72 years (mean 44) were included and analyzed. We found a good diagnostic accuracy of the low field MR in identifying the injuries of the menisci (93%) and the crossed ligaments (96%), but a lower accuracy for the articular cartilage (85%). Sensitivity resulted 90% for menisci, 73% for ligaments and 58% for cartilage. Specificity was 91% for menisci, 97% for ligaments and 92% for cartilage. Inter-observer concordance resulted to be excellent for cruciate ligaments (K of Cohen’s test = 0.832), good (K = 0.768) for menisci, modest to moderate for articular cartilage (K from 0.236 to 0.389) with worse concordance for tibial cartilage. Conclusions: Low-field MR sectoral device with dedicated joint equipment confirms its diagnostic reliability for the evaluation of meniscal and cruciate ligaments lesions but is weak in evaluating low grade chondral lesions. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Validation, Intrarater and Interrater Reliability Study of the Lateral-Anterior Drawer Test for Detecting Posterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures: Study Protocol of a Prospective Controlled Single-Blinded Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Commonly used clinical tests for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture detection exhibit several limitations, thus requiring more precise clinical PCL tests. The lateral-anterior drawer (LAD) test has been proposed as a manually applied testing alternative but not yet been evaluated in vivo.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Fifteen patients presenting with an MRI-confirmed acute or chronic unilateral PCL rupture and 15 subjects with no prior knee injury in their medical history will be included in this prospective single-blinded cross-sectional cohort study. Three examiners with different lengths of working experience (range 1-30 years), blinded to MRI outcomes and patient history, will use the LAD test on both knees of each participant to test for PCL integrity. Examiners will independently document the PCL status of each knee on a blank case report form. Fleiss-Kappa values will be calculated to investigate whether the LAD test shows clinically significant interrater and intrarater reliability. Furthermore, LAD test outcomes will be compared with MRI which serves as reference standard to check for concurrent validity. Moreover, LAD test accuracy with respect to tester experience will be evaluated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will be conducted in agreement with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2013). Ethical permission (EK16-081-0616) to conduct this study was obtained from the review board of the city of Vienna on 1 September 2016. All personal and research data will be used in accordance with the Austrian Federal Data Protection Act and will be anonymised before publication in relevant international peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONNUMBER

DRKS00013268; Pre-results.

Current status of ACL reconstruction in Germany

INTRODUCTION

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is characterized by a variety of possibilities concerning its implementation. Different choices for grafts, fixation methods and tunnel positioning, as well as diverse technical tools are available and have clinical significance. Besides specific pre- and post-operative procedures, different indications for surgery and further surgeon-/clinic-related factors add variability to the treatment. In response to the lack of descriptive statistics about the implementation of these factors and the increasing numbers of ACL reconstructions this study has been conducted to display the current state of the treatment for ACL tears throughout Germany.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

709 clinics with surgical and orthopedic departments were provided an online-questionnaire that surveyed their statistical records (e.g. annually implemented operations, number of surgeons, duration of operations), implemented techniques (e.g. choice of grafts, construction of drilling tunnel, tibial/femoral fixation) and personal assessment (e.g. frequency/cause of graft failure, frequency/handling of infection). The response rate was 22 % (n = 155). Based on the statistical records a specialized group within the respondents was identified, enabling a cross-comparison between high- and low-volume surgeons.

RESULTS

On average, the German orthopedic surgeons in the clinics surveyed annually performs 35 ACL reconstructions, with each operation lasting an average of 67 min. After subdividing the data with references to annually performed surgeries into high- and low-volume-surgeons, differences and common features between the subgroups become apparent. Differences between high- and low-volume-surgeons, respectively, show shorter duration of both ACL reconstructions (55 vs. 71 min) and revision ACL reconstructions (75 vs. 90 min), higher membership rates in professional associations (83 vs. 38 % have at least one membership), more frequent implementation of stability examinations (47 vs. 21 %) and different frequencies of femoral drilling techniques (using the anterolateral portal in 71 vs. 54 %). With reference to evaluating operation dates, choosing grafts and assessing reasons for graft failure both groups share commonalities, as well as regarding the predominant use of monofixation for femoral fixation (88 % of the participants-mainly with endobutton in 38 % and transfixation pin in 27 %) and for tibial fixation (81 % of the participants-mainly with bioabsorbable screw in 60 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of ACL tears in the group of German clinics studied is characterized by a variety of surgical possibilities. This condition might reflect the entirety of clinics reconstructing ACL in Germany. For the first time, a descriptive statistical survey was implemented to display this variety and to provide insight into the current status quo. Within the entirety of surgeons implementing ACL reconstruction a specialized subgroup with a particular expertise seems to exist.

Diagnostic capability of low- versus high-field magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar degenerative disease

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic capability of low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with high-field MRI for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Low-field MRI has several advantages over high-field magnetic resonance systems (easier installation, lower purchase, and maintenance cost). The diagnostic capability of low-field MRI for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine has not been compared with that of high-field MRI.

METHODS

Hundred patients (mean age: 56.3 yr, range: 32-80; F:M = 59:41) with neurogenic claudication or sciatica were studied. All patients underwent MRI of the lumbar spine on both low-field (0.25T) and high-field (1.5T or 3.0T) magnetic resonance systems. Intervertebral disc herniation, central canal, lateral recess, and exit foraminal stenosis as well as nerve root compression at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 were evaluated by 2 radiologists for both low- and high-field systems using established reliable grading systems.

RESULTS

There was excellent agreement between low- and high- field MRI with regard to grading the presence and severity of disc herniation (r = 0.92-0.94; P < 0.05), central canal stenosis (r = 0.89-0.91; P < 0.05), lateral recess stenosis (r = 0.81-0.87; P < 0.05), and exit foramen stenosis (r = 0.81-0.89; P < 0.05). Descending or exiting nerve root compression occurred in 52% of patients at L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 levels, with good agreement between low-field and high-field MRI (r = 0.71-0.76; P < 0.05) for nerve root compression.

CONCLUSION

Excellent reliability between low- and high- field MRI was found for most features of lumbar disc degeneration, with good agreement for nerve root compression. 0.25T MRI was more susceptible to motion artifact, probably due to longer scanning time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Analysis of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners for Evaluation of Knee Pathology Based on Arthroscopy

Background:

In recent years, few studies have evaluated low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnoses compared with intraoperative findings of the knee.

Purpose:

To determine the accuracy and sensitivity of low-field MRI scanners in diagnosing pathology of the menisci, cruciate ligaments, and osteochondral surfaces.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

MRI examinations without intra-articular contrast were performed on 379 patients for knee pathologies over a 4-year period. The MRI examinations were done using a 0.2-tesla scanner utilizing a dedicated knee coil and read by 1 of 3 board-certified, musculoskeletal fellowship–trained radiologists. Within a mean time of 50 days after MRI, all patients underwent knee arthroscopy performed by 1 of 2 sports fellowship–trained orthopaedic surgeons. Operative notes from the knee arthroscopies were then reviewed by a single independent observer, and the intraoperative findings were compared with the MRI reports.

Results:

For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 83%, 81%, 89%, and 71%, respectively. For lateral meniscus tears, the values were 51%, 93%, 84%, and 73%, respectively. For anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, the values were 85%, 94%, 69%, and 97%, respectively. For osteochondral lesions, the values were 8%, 99%, 29%, and 94%, respectively. For posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears, the specificity and negative predictive value were 99% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Low-field MRI was an accurate tool for evaluation of medial meniscus and ACL tears. However, within the study population, it is not as effective in diagnosing lateral meniscus tears and showed a poor ability to detect osteochondral lesions. More information is needed to properly assess its ability to diagnose PCL tears.

Physical examination tests for the diagnosis of posterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize and evaluate research on the accuracy of physical examination tests for diagnosis of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tear.

BACKGROUND

Rupture of the PCL is a severe knee injury that can lead to delayed rehabilitation, instability, or chronic knee pathologies. To our knowledge, there is currently no systematic review of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests to evaluate the integrity of the PCL.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE from 1946, Embase from 1974, and the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database from 1985 until April 30, 2012. Studies were considered eligible if they compared the results of physical examination tests performed in the context of a PCL physical examination to those of a reference standard (arthroscopy, arthrotomy, magnetic resonance imaging). Methodological quality assessment was performed by 2 independent reviewers using the revised version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy revealed 1307 articles, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria for this review. In these studies, 11 different physical examination tests were identified. Due to differences in study types, different patient populations, and methodological quality, meta-analysis was not indicated. Presently, most physical examination tests have not been evaluated sufficiently enough to be confident in their ability to either confirm or rule out a PCL tear.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of physical examination tests to assess the integrity of the PCL is largely unknown. There is a strong need for further research in this area. Level of Evidence Diagnosis, level 3a.