1
|
Khawcharoenporn T, Chimkhong W, Roestpricha V. Use of Template Documents with Guidance to Improve the Quality of Human Subjects Research Protocol Submissions to a Thai Research Ethics Committee. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2021; 16:501-513. [PMID: 34125621 DOI: 10.1177/15562646211025470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A pre-post study was conducted to evaluate the utility of template documents specifically created to assist research protocol submissions to a Thai research ethics committee (REC). A total of 172 protocols during the 2014-2016 preintervention period were matched to 172 protocols during the 2017-2019 postintervention period by type of principal investigator and REC review category. The intervention was associated with a significant reduction in initial REC requirement deficiencies in the information sheet and informed consent form, resubmission turn-around time by the principal investigator, and time form protocol submission to REC approval. The most significant postintervention improvements were for information about the consent process and listed risks of study participation. In this study, utilization of a structured protocol template with guidance instructions was associated with measurable improvement in the quality of research protocol submissions and REC review process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thana Khawcharoenporn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, 37699Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.,Human Research Ethics Committee of Thammasat University (Medicine), 37699Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Wilaiwan Chimkhong
- Human Research Ethics Committee of Thammasat University (Medicine), 37699Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Varanya Roestpricha
- Human Research Ethics Committee of Thammasat University (Medicine), 37699Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paramasivan S, Davies P, Richards A, Wade J, Rooshenas L, Mills N, Realpe A, Raj JP, Subramani S, Ives J, Huxtable R, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e004729. [PMID: 34006518 PMCID: PMC8137180 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The post-2005 rise in clinical trials and clinical research conducted in India was accompanied by frequent reports of unethical practices, leading to a series of regulatory changes. We conducted a systematic scoping review to obtain an overview of empirical research pertaining to the ethics of clinical trials/research in India. METHODS Our search strategy combined terms related to ethics/bioethics, informed consent, clinical trials/research and India, across nine databases, up to November 2019. Peer-reviewed research exploring ethical aspects of clinical trials/research in India with any stakeholder groups was included. We developed an evidence map, undertook a narrative synthesis and identified research gaps. A consultation exercise with stakeholders in India helped contextualise the review and identify additional research priorities. RESULTS Titles/Abstracts of 9699 articles were screened, full text of 282 obtained and 80 were included. Research on the ethics of clinical trials/research covered a wide range of topics, often conducted with little to no funding. Studies predominantly examined what lay (patients/public) and professional participants (eg, healthcare staff/students/faculty) know about topics such as research ethics or understand from the information given to obtain their consent for research participation. Easily accessible groups, namely ethics committee members and healthcare students were frequently researched. Research gaps included developing a better understanding of the recruitment-informed consent process, including the doctor-patient interaction, in multiple contexts and exploring issues of equity and justice in clinical trials/research. CONCLUSION The review demonstrates that while a wide range of topics have been studied in India, the focus is largely on assessing knowledge levels across different population groups. This is a useful starting point, but fundamental questions remain unanswered about informed consent processes and broader issues of inequity that pervade the clinical trials/research landscape. A priority-setting exercise and appropriate funding mechanisms to support researchers in India would help improve the clinical trials/research ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangeetha Paramasivan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Philippa Davies
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) ConDuCT-II Trials Methodology Hub, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Richards
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Medical Research Council (MRC) ConDuCT-II Trials Methodology Hub, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julia Wade
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Nicola Mills
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Alba Realpe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| | - Jeffrey Pradeep Raj
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Subramani
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Richard Huxtable
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jane M Blazeby
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Jenny L Donovan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR ARC West, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalikar M, Dakhale G, Sinha V, Giradkar A. Analysis of clinical trial agreement and insurance policy submitted to the ethics committee of a tertiary care teaching institute in central India. Perspect Clin Res 2021; 13:151-154. [PMID: 35928639 PMCID: PMC9345254 DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_124_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Materials and Methods: Results: Conclusion:
Collapse
|
4
|
Naureen Z, Beccari T, Marks RS, Brown R, Lorusso L, Pheby D, Miertus S, Herbst KL, Stuppia L, Henehan G, Falsini B, Lumer L, Dundar M, Bertelli M, Study Group IB. Ethics committees for clinical experimentation at international level with a focus on Italy. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2020; 91:e2020016. [PMID: 33170165 PMCID: PMC8023139 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i13-s.10643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Guiding legislation and associated bureaucracy for the ethical review of clinical trials observational studies and food related research play an important role in the competitiveness of a nation in the face of tough global competition to attract sponsors and investigators. This is of particular relevance in the case of multicentre trials and multidisciplinary research. Accordingly, in this report we tried to gather in-depth knowledge of the current role and practices of ethics committees nationwide in both clinical and research settings. This mini-review aims to describe the formulation and organization of ethical committees in Italy in order to provide a focus for deliberations on ethical issues in medical and scientific research in line with human rights, as set out in the European Union charter. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of an institution’s ethical committee intervention on reducing the time required to obtain an opinion from Research Ethics Committees by guiding investigators in addressing ethical issues in their proposed studies. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zakira Naureen
- Department of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman.
| | - Tommaso Beccari
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Robert S Marks
- Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
| | - Richard Brown
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | | | - Derek Pheby
- Visiting Professor of Epidemiology (retired), Buckinghamshire New University, High Wycombe, UK.
| | - Stanislav Miertus
- Department of Biotechnology, University of SS. Cyril and Methodius, Trnava, Slovakia.
| | - Karen L Herbst
- College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
| | - Liborio Stuppia
- Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Gary Henehan
- School of Food Science and Environmental Health, Technological University Dublin, Dublin 1, Ireland.
| | - Benedetto Falsini
- Institute of Ophthalmology, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ludovica Lumer
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Univerity College London, London, UK.
| | - Munis Dundar
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
| | - Matteo Bertelli
- EBTNA-LAB, Rovereto (TN), Italy; MAGI EUREGIO, Bolzano, Italy; MAGI'S LAB, Rovereto (TN), Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Desai AV, Hawaldar RW, Divatia JV. Role of accreditation in quality improvement of institutional Review Board. Perspect Clin Res 2017; 8:145-147. [PMID: 28828310 PMCID: PMC5543766 DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.210445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the process of accreditation resulting in improvement of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) functioning. METHODOLOGY Randomly selected projects from years 2007 (before accreditation), 2010 (after accreditation), and 2013 (after reaccreditation) were evaluated to assess parameters, namely, submission of good clinical practices (GCPs), completeness of IRB submission form, fulfillment of quorum, documentation of the declaration of conflict of interests, and submission of the status reports. Compliance to these parameters was compared over a period of 3 years. RESULTS A total of seventy projects were evaluated retrospectively. Compliance of the principal investigators regarding submission of GCP certificates increased substantially from 5% to 53.1%. Completeness of IRB forms was 80% in 2007 while it became 100% in 2010 and continued even in 2013. Fulfillment of quorum increased significantly from 35% in 2007 to 100% in 2010 and 2013 after the accreditation procedures. Out of the selected twenty projects (2007), nonfinancial conflict of interest was not declared in all three applicable projects, while of 18 projects (2010), nonfinancial conflict of interest was declared in all three applicable cases. Of 32 projects (2013), nonfinancial conflict of interest was declared in seven out of eight applicable cases. Timely submission of status reports increased from 10% in 2007 to 38.9% in 2010 and 37.5% in 2013. CONCLUSION Accreditation plays a vital role in the improvement of IRB. The policies and procedures formulated and implemented during the process of accreditation resulted in improvement of IRB performance. Continuing training of the IRB and researchers is required to maintain the accreditation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhidnya Vasant Desai
- Department of Institutional Review Board, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rohini W. Hawaldar
- Department of Institutional Review Board, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jigeeshu V. Divatia
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shah PC, Panchasara AK, Barvaliya MJ, Tripathi CB. A Study of Assessing Errors and Completeness of Research Application Forms Submitted to Instituitional Ethics Committee (IEC) of a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10:FC10-FC12. [PMID: 27790458 DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/18393.8488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Application form of research work is an essential requirement which is required to be submitted along with the research proposal to the Ethics Committee (EC). AIM To check the completeness and to find the errors in application forms submitted to the EC of a tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS The application forms of research projects submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India from January 2014 to June 2015 were analysed for completeness and errors, with respect to the following - type of study, information about study investigators, sample size, study participants, title of the studies, signatures of all investigators, regulatory approval, recruitment procedure, compensation to study participants, informed consent process, information about sponsor, declaration of conflict of interest, plans for storage and maintenance of data, patient information sheet, informed consent forms and study related documents. RESULTS Total 100 application forms were analysed. Among them, 98 were academic and 2 were industrial studies. Majority of academic studies were of basic science type. In 63.26% studies, type of study was not mentioned in title. Age group of subjects was not mentioned in 8.16% application forms. In 34.6% informed consent, benefits of the study were not mentioned. Signature of investigators/co-investigators/Head of the Department was missing in 3.06% cases. CONCLUSION Our study recommends that the efficiency and speed of review will increase if investigator will increase vigilance regarding filling of application forms. Regular meetings will be helpful to solve the problems related to content of application forms. The uniformity in functioning of EC can be achieved if common application form for all ECs is there.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pruthak C Shah
- Student, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College , Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
| | - Ashwin K Panchasara
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, GMERS Medical College , Sola, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Manish J Barvaliya
- Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College , Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
| | - C B Tripathi
- Professor and Head, Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College , Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walanj AS. Research ethics committees: Need for harmonization at the national level, the global and Indian perspective. Perspect Clin Res 2014; 5:66-70. [PMID: 24741482 PMCID: PMC3980546 DOI: 10.4103/2229-3485.128022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Ethics committee (EC) organization and standardization is an important aspect of clinical research. There is a healthy trend worldwide to register and/or accredit research ECs reviewing clinical research. This article tries to focus on the existing model of ECs worldwide, as against the Indian backdrop. The article reviews literature, journals, websites, and studies conducted in 10 different countries and outlines the working model of ECs in these countries. The challenges faced during the ethical review, especially in case of multicenter trials, have been identified. A solution has been suggested to overcome these challenges, and to ensure the overall smooth functioning of clinical trials. The article proposes the development of national and regional central ECs to counter the current drawbacks in the ethical review mechanisms in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna Sanjiv Walanj
- Clinical Research Department Head, Ethika Clinical Research Center, Prakruti Hospital, Thane, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|