Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of glass fiber reinforced, carbon, and quartz post in endodontically treated teeth: An in-vitro study

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Carbon Fiber Posts and Glass Fiber Posts in Permanent Anterior Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Introduction Dental caries and traumatic injuries often lead to tooth loss in adolescents and adults, necessitating endodontic treatment and subsequent restoration. Restoring such teeth presents a challenge due to varying degrees of substance loss. After endodontic treatment, the choice of an appropriate post is crucial for long-term stability. While metal posts are sturdy, they lack aesthetics and may cause root fractures. Fiber posts, such as carbon and glass fiber, offer improved aesthetics and mechanical properties, but their comparative performance warrants investigation. Materials and methods A total of 30 extracted anterior single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups to receive either carbon fiber or glass fiber posts. After endodontic treatment and post-space preparation, the posts were cemented using a dual polymerizing adhesive resin composite. Fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine. Results The mean fracture resistance of the carbon fiber post group was recorded at 271.2 N, whereas the glass fiber post group exhibited a significantly higher mean fracture resistance of 416.133 N. This difference in fracture resistance between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion Glass fiber post systems demonstrated superior fracture resistance compared to carbon fiber post systems in anterior single-rooted teeth. These findings support the clinical preference for glass fiber posts in restoring endodontically treated anterior teeth, offering both mechanical reliability and aesthetic advantages. However, further research, including long-term clinical trials, is warranted to validate these findings and assess the overall clinical performance and longevity of fiber post systems in real-world settings.

An Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Two Types of Posts (Diamond Posts and Fiber Posts): An In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of endodontically treated permanent mandibular premolars restored with two types of posts: diamond posts and glass-fiber posts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty human mandibular premolars indicated for orthodontic extraction were collected for this study and were similar in shape, size, and length. The teeth were sectioned horizontally, 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction. Root canal treatment was carried out on all specimens, and obturation was done by lateral condensation. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups. The post space was prepared in the first group to receive the diamond posts and in the second group to receive the fiber posts. A dual-cure resin material was used for cementing the posts and building up the cores. Then, they were subjected to a compressive load at a cross-head speed of 1 mm per minute and at an angle of 135 degrees to the long axis of the tooth until a fracture occurred using a universal testing machine. Fracture resistance and the mode of failure were assessed. The fracture above the acrylic block level was considered favorable, and the fracture below the acrylic block level was considered unfavorable. The data were analyzed statistically. The statistical analysis of fracture resistance between the two groups was carried out with a t-test. The statistical analysis for the failure mode of the teeth was carried out with a chi-square test.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference showing that the diamond posts had better fracture resistance when compared with glass-fiber posts, while there was no statistically significant difference in terms of the failure mode between the two posts.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that diamond posts showed higher fracture resistance than glass-fiber posts. Glass-fiber posts showed more favorable failure modes but were statistically insignificant compared to diamond posts.

Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different aesthetic post and core systems under all ceramic restoration luted with two types of cements

Context

Fracture of endodontically treated teeth is a grave sequela that a clinician should seriously ponder. Suitable selection of restorative materials is a requisite for long-term clinical success.

Aims

To compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different posts luted using two different cements under all ceramic crowns.

Settings and Design

This in vitro study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

Methods and Material

Thirty endodontically treated single-rooted mandibular premolars in which post spaces were prepared and divided into three different groups. Group 1 (n = 10): zirconia post group. Group 2 (n = 10): quartz fibre post group. Group 3 (n = 10): glass fibre post group. Each group is sub-divided into two based on the luting system: resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) or dual-cure resin cement (DCRC). The fracture resistance testing was performed in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min.

Statistical Analysis Used

The mean fracture resistance were analysed using independent sample Student t-test and one-way ANOVA.

Results

: Within the zirconia post group, the mean fracture resistance was higher in DCRC sub-group compared to the RMGIC sub-group and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.017). The difference in fracture resistance between three different post systems was not found to be statistically significant with respect to both the luting systems.

Conclusions

It was observed that when zirconia post is used, the mean fracture resistance was higher in dual-cure resin group compared to the resin-modified GIC group.

Fracture resistance to treated teeth using known endodontics techniques in Indian patients

Teeth with crown structure less than 50% can be restored. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate an in vitro efficacy of Zirconia post, Glass fiber post, polyethylene-woven fiber posts, and Quartz posts. Forty eight recently extracted mandibular first premolar teeth were randomly grouped in to 4 different groups with 12 samples in each group. After endodontic treatment samples in all groups underwent post preparation followed by restoration with respective posts. The mean fracture resistance (Newton) were 463.5 ± 14.3 (Group I) 425.2± 23.5 (group II), 410.4± 18.6 (Group 3) and 385.2 ± 14.2 (group 4). Data shows that Zirconia post had highest fracture resistance compared to other tested groups.

Retention of Provisional Intraradicular Retainers Using Fiberglass Pins

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to compare the retention properties between fiberglass pins with chemically activated acrylic resin and metallic intraradicular retainers often used for the purpose of temporary prosthetic retention.

Materials and Methods:

Two mechanical tests, pushout and traction, were performed on specimens distributed in three groups (n = 10) for each test; two metal pins G1: Metalpin Ângelus and G2: Provisional Pivot Jon in addition to one fiberglass pin G3: Whitepost DC-E, FGM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test was used at the level of significance α = 0.05.

Results:

The fiberglass pins (G3) showed higher values in the traction test than the metal pins (G1 and G2) with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05); however, they performed similarly to the metal pin groups in the pushout test (P > 0.05). They also presented a lower occurrence of failure in the relining acrylic resin.

Conclusion:

The study pointed out the use of fiberglass pins as suitable alternatives for provisional intracanal metallic retainers.

The effect of a root-dentin pretreatment technique combining PIPS with MTAD aiming to improve the bond strength of glass fiber post

The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined effect of MTAD and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) technique on the smear layer removal and the bond strength of glass fiber post. Fifty-five human mandibular premolars were chosen. After root canal therapy and post space preparation, the teeth were equally divided to five groups according to the methods of root-dentin pretreatment: G1: distilled water (control); G2: 2.5% NaOCl+17% EDTA; G3: MTAD; G4: PIPS; G5: MTAD+PIPS. One sample was randomly selected from each group, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the microscopic morphology of the coronal, middle and apical level of the root-dentin. The remaining ten samples from each group were glued to glass fiber posts, and the bond strength was assessed by push-out test. SEM evaluation showed that the most complete smear layer removal was found in MTAD + PIPS group, especially in coronal third. Push-out test results exhibited that there was a statistically significant interaction between the experimental groups and root canal third (p < .0005). Significant differences could be found among five groups (p < .05): G5 > G4 > G3 > G2 > G1. G5 had the highest bond strength. In conclusion, post space pretreatments with MTAD or PIPS technique can significantly remove smear layer and improve the bond strength of glass fiber post, and combination of them works best.

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Different Post Systems

Aim

The study was done to evaluate the fracture resistance of carbon, glass fiber, and zirconia posts.

Materials and Methods

Forty-five human premolars indicated for orthodontic extraction were subjected to root canal treatment and obturated with gutta-percha. All the teeth were decoronated and mounted in acrylic block. Then, teeth were equally divided into three groups: (a) carbon, (b) glass fiber, and (c) zirconia post group. Post space was prepared and particular post was cemented in post space. Core buildup was made with composite. A compressive load was applied using universal testing machine and fracture force was measured in MPa. The data were tabulated, and statistical evaluation was done using statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, using one-way analysis of variance for analysis of difference and Bonferroni post hoc test.

Results

Zirconia endodontic post had good fracture resistance (489.2 MPa) when compared with carbon (258.4 MPa) and glass fiber-reinforced post (348.7 MPa). Fracture resistance was statistically significant between test groups P>0.001.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that zirconia had good fracture resistance compared to glass fiber and carbon posts.