1
|
Umar Z, Tang JW, Marshall BJ, Tay ACY, Wang L. Rapid diagnosis and precision treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical settings. Crit Rev Microbiol 2024:1-30. [PMID: 38910506 DOI: 10.1080/1040841x.2024.2364194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative bacterium that colonizes the stomach of approximately half of the worldwide population, with higher prevalence in densely populated areas like Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America, and Africa. H. pylori infections range from asymptomatic cases to potentially fatal diseases, including peptic ulcers, chronic gastritis, and stomach adenocarcinoma. The management of these conditions has become more difficult due to the rising prevalence of drug-resistant H. pylori infections, which ultimately lead to gastric cancer and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. In 1994, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) categorized H. pylori as a Group I carcinogen, contributing to approximately 780,000 cancer cases annually. Antibiotic resistance against drugs used to treat H. pylori infections ranges between 15% and 50% worldwide, with Asian countries having exceptionally high rates. This review systematically examines the impacts of H. pylori infection, the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance, and the urgent need for accurate diagnosis and precision treatment. The present status of precision treatment strategies and prospective approaches for eradicating infections caused by antibiotic-resistant H. pylori will also be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeeshan Umar
- Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Wei Tang
- Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
- The Marshall Centre for Infectious Diseases Research and Training, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, China
| | - Barry J Marshall
- Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- The Marshall Centre for Infectious Diseases Research and Training, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, China
- Marshall International Digestive Diseases Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
- Marshall Medical Research Center, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Alfred Chin Yen Tay
- Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- The Marshall Centre for Infectious Diseases Research and Training, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, China
- Marshall International Digestive Diseases Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
- Marshall Medical Research Center, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
- Division of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, China
- Center for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, China
- School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Biswas DP, Tk DS. The efficacy of adjuvant N acetyl cysteine for the eradication of H pylori infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2022; 46:101832. [PMID: 34775122 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biofilm-producing bacteria are relatively resistant to antibiotics, as the penetration of antibiotics into the endopolysaccharide envelope is incomplete. N Acetyl cysteine (NAC) is known to destabilize the biofilms, as it cleaves the disulfide bonds of mucus glycoproteins, reducing the viscosity and thickness of mucus. This allows NAC to act synergistically with antibiotics for the eradication of H Pylori. The meta-analysis evaluates the evidence of the efficacy of adjuvant N acetyl cysteine (NAC) compared to standard therapies in the eradication of H. Pylori infections. METHODS We searched randomized clinical trials in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), EBSCO, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), and Google Scholar. We included trials comparing standard treatment protocols plus adjuvant NAC and the same regimen without NAC. These studies included adults with a diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Our primary outcome was the successful eradication of H. Pylori. The results were pooled using a random-effects model, and data were analyzed using RevMan 5.0 software. Cochrane collaboration's tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Publication bias and other inconsistencies were assessed. Sensitivity analyses and grading of evidence were performed. FINDINGS Eight studies, comprising 1167 patients, were included in the meta-analysis, the pooled outcomes of patients on adjuvant NAC+ standard eradication therapy noted an eradication rate of 76.1% (n=581) compared to the patients in standard eradication therapy with a rate of 72.18% (n=586), RR 1.17 [95% CI (0.99, 1.39); I2= 64%; p value=0.07]. Moderate to severe heterogeneity was noted. These pooled results show that adjuvant NAC plus standard treatment protocols are not superior to standard treatment protocols for H pylori eradication. Similar results were seen in the use of adjuvant NAC with 'currently used standard treatment protocols' (78.3% versus 76.3%, RR 1.08, [95% CI 0.94 to 1.25]; I2=55%; p=0.28; n= 829 patients], as well as in the treatment of naïve patients (79.8% versus 80.9%, RR 1.00[95% CI 0.87 to 1.15]; i2=27%; P=-0.98; n= 775 patients]. CONCLUSION Adjuvant NAC plus standard treatment protocols are not superior to standard treatment protocols for H. pylori eradication. These findings are consistent with the use of adjuvant NAC with 'currently used standard treatment protocols' (clarithromycin-based triple therapies) and also with adjuvant NAC used in the treatment of naïve patients. We are moderately certain of these findings. Future studies could explore the use of NAC as a pretreatment before using the current standard therapies in the eradication of H. Pylori rather than NAC as adjuvant therapy. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dr Pritam Biswas
- Department of Medical Pharmacology & Clinical Therapeutics, St Matthews University School of Medicine, Georgetown, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.
| | - Dr Sukumar Tk
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, St Matthews University School of Medicine, Georgetown, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen CC, Luo JC, Fang YJ, Lee JY, Kuo CC, Yang TH, Chiu MC, Yu JJ, Bair MJ, Chen PY, Chou CK, Chen CY, Chang CY, Hsu YC, Tseng CH, Hsu WF, Hu WH, Tsai MH, Hsieh CL, Chen MJ, Shun CT, Liu TY, Lee§ YC, Liou§ JM, Wu§ MS. Comparison of the effect of clarithromycin triple therapy with or without N-acetylcysteine in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a randomized controlled trial. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820927306. [PMID: 32821287 PMCID: PMC7406927 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820927306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether adjunctive N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may improve the efficacy of triple therapy in the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection remains unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of 14-day triple therapy with or without NAC for the first-line treatment of H. pylori. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2018, 680 patients with H. pylori infection naïve to treatment were enrolled in this multicenter, open-label, randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive triple therapy with NAC [NAC-T14, dexlansoprazole 60 mg four times daily (q.d.); amoxicillin 1 g twice daily (b.i.d.), clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., NAC 600 mg b.i.d.] for 14 days, or triple therapy alone (T14, dexlansoprazole 60 mg q.d.; amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.) for 14 days. Our primary outcome was the eradication rates by intention to treat (ITT). Antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 gene polymorphism were determined. RESULTS The ITT analysis demonstrated H. pylori eradication rates in NAC-T14 and T14 were 81.7% [276/338, 95% confidence interval (CI): 77.5-85.8%] and 84.3% (285/338, 95% CI 80.4-88.2%), respectively. In 646 participants who adhered to their assigned therapy, the eradication rates were 85.7% and 88.0% with NAC-T14 and T14 therapies, respectively. There were no differences in compliance or adverse effects. The eradication rates in subjects with clarithromycin-resistant, amoxicillin-resistant, or either clarithromycin/amoxicillin resistant strains were 45.2%, 57.9%, and 52.2%, respectively, for NAC-T14, and were 66.7%, 76.9%, and 70.0%, respectively, for T14. The efficacy of NAC-T14 and T14 was not affected by CYP2C19 polymorphism. CONCLUSION Add-on NAC to triple therapy was not superior to triple therapy alone for first-line H. pylori eradication [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02249546].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chieh-Chang Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jiing-Chyuan Luo
- Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan,Keelung Hospital, Ministry of Health Welfare, Keelung City, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Fang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Yun-Lin, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Yuh Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Yun-Lin, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chi Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Yun-Lin, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hua Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Yun-Lin, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Min-Chin Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Yun-Lin, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Jyun Yu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin Branch, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Yun-Lin, Yun-Lin, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jong Bair
- Department of Internal Medicine, Taitung Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taitung, Taiwan,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Yueh Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Chu-Kuang Chou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Yi Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Yang Chang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan,Department of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chun Hsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital and I-Shou University, Kaohsiung County, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hao Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Cancer Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Feng Hsu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan,National Taiwan University Cancer Center, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hao Hu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Min-Horn Tsai
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Lin Hsieh
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Jyh Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Tung Shun
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan,Institute of Forensic Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tzeng-Ying Liu
- Health Bureau of Lienchiang County, Nangan Hsiang, Lienchiang County, Matsu, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee§
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Ming Liou§
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7, Chung-Shan S. Road, Taipei Taiwan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fontes LES, Martimbianco ALC, Zanin C, Riera R. N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 2:CD012357. [PMID: 30746681 PMCID: PMC6370586 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012357.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is one of the most common pathogens to establish and cause infection in human beings, affecting about 50% of the world's population. Prevalence may be as high as 83% in Latin American countries and as low as 17% in North America. Approximately 20% of infected people will manifest disease; people at high risk include those who live in low- and middle-income countries with poor sanitary conditions, since the mechanism of transmission seems to be oral-oral or faecal-oral (mostly during infancy). There are several antibiotic regimens to treat the infection, but antibiotic resistance is growing around the world. New adjuvant drugs - such as probiotics, statins, curcumin, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) - are being tested to enhance eradication rates.N-acetylcysteine can destabilise the biofilm structure; it also has synergic action with antibiotics, and bactericidal effects. In addition, NAC has antioxidant properties, and has a primary mucolytic effect by reducing the thickness of the gastric mucus layer, both of which may exert beneficial adjuvant effects on H pylori eradication. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant therapy to antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2018), Embase (1988 to April 2018), CINAHL (1982 to April 2018), LILACS (1982 to April 2018), grey literature databases and trials registries. We handsearched the reference lists of relevant studies. We screened 726 articles and assessed 18 for eligibility. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any antibiotic regimen plus NAC, in adults infected with H pylori. To be included, trials had to use a control consisting of the same antibiotic regimen with or without placebo. Outcomes of interest were eradication rates, and gastrointestinal, toxic, and allergic adverse events. Reporting of the primary outcomes listed here was not an inclusion criterion for the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently reviewed and extracted data and completed the 'Risk of bias' assessments. A third review author independently confirmed the 'Risk of bias' assessments. We used Review Manager 5 software for data analysis. We contacted study authors if there was missing information. MAIN RESULTS We included eight RCTs (with a total of 559 participants) in this review. The studies recruited outpatients aged between 17 and 76 years who were referred to endoscopy centres in several different countries. The certainty of evidence was reduced for most outcomes due to the poor methodological quality of included studies; issues mainly related to the generation of allocation sequence, allocation concealment, and blinding (this last domain related specifically to adverse outcomes).We are uncertain whether the addition of NAC to antibiotics improves H pylori eradication rates, compared with the addition of placebo or no NAC (38.8% versus 49.1%, risk ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 1.08; participants = 559; studies = eight; very low-certainty evidence). A post-hoc sensitivity analysis, in which we removed studies that tested antibiotic regimens no longer recommended in clinical practice, showed that the addition of NAC may improve eradication rates compared to control (27.2% versus 37.6%, RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94; participants = 397; published studies = five).We are uncertain whether NAC is associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events compared to control (23.9% versus 18.9%, RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.85; participants = 336; studies = five; very low-certaintyevidence), or allergic adverse events (2% versus 0%, RR 2.98, 95% CI 0.32 to 27.74; participants = 336; studies = five; very low-certainty evidence). There were no reports of toxic adverse events amongst included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We are uncertain whether the addition of NAC to antibiotics improves H pylori eradication rates compared with the addition of placebo or no NAC. Due to the clinical, statistical and methodological heterogeneity found in included studies, and the uncertainty observed when analysing therapy subgroups, any possible beneficial effect of NAC should be regarded cautiously.We are uncertain whether NAC is associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal or allergic adverse events compared with placebo or no NAC. There were no reports of toxic adverse events amongst the included studies.Further large, well-designed, randomised clinical studies should be conducted, with good reporting standards and appropriate collection of efficacy and safety outcomes, especially for current recommended antibiotic regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luís Eduardo S Fontes
- Petrópolis Medical SchoolDepartment of Evidence‐Based Medicine, Intensive Care, GastroenterologyAv Barao do Rio Branco, 1003PetrópolisRJBrazil25680‐120
| | - Ana Luiza C Martimbianco
- Centro de Estudos de Saúde Baseada em Evidências e Avaliação Tecnológica em SaúdeCochrane BrazilRua Borges Lagoa, 564 cj 63São PauloSPBrazil04038‐000
| | - Carolina Zanin
- Hospital Alcides CarneiroIntensive Care UnitPetrópolisRJBrazil
| | - Rachel Riera
- Centro de Estudos de Saúde Baseada em Evidências e Avaliação Tecnológica em SaúdeCochrane BrazilRua Borges Lagoa, 564 cj 63São PauloSPBrazil04038‐000
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang-Ou YB, Hu Y, Zhu Y, Lu NH. The effect of antioxidants on Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Helicobacter 2018; 23:e12535. [PMID: 30191635 DOI: 10.1111/hel.12535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 07/21/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of the addition of antioxidants to triple or quadruple therapy were unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 guidelines. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify potentially relevant publications using the following keywords: ([Helicobacter pylori] or [H. pylori] or [Hp]) and ([antioxidant] or [vitamin] or [N-acetylcysteine] or [curcumin] or [cranberry]). The primary end-point of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the addition of antioxidants to triple or quadruple therapy according to ITT and PP analysis. The second end-points were side effects and the comparative efficacy in terms of H. pylori eradication according to different antioxidant and antibiotic combinations. RESULTS We included 9 studies with 1260 participants. The total eradication rate of H. pylori in the group combining eradication therapy with antioxidants was not superior to that without antioxidants according to the ITT (pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.17 [0.99-1.38]; P = 0.07) and PP analysis (pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.15 [0.99-1.34; P = 0.07]. There were no differences regarding side effects between the two groups (pooled RR [95% CI], 1.36 [0.81-2.28]; P = 0.24). However, the eradication regimen with vitamin supplementation (1400 mg/day) showed a significant, superior efficacy in eradication relative to those without supplementation (pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.57 [1.35, 1.84]; P < 0.01). In particular, in the amoxicillin-clarithromycin-based subgroup, the crude H. pylori eradication rate determined by ITT analysis was 81.3% and 68.6% for eradication therapy with and without antioxidant supplementation, respectively, which was a statistically significant difference (pooled RR [95% CI] = 1.23 [1.02-1.49]; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The addition of antioxidants (vitamin, N-acetylcysteine, curcumin, cranberry) to amoxicillin-clarithromycin-based therapy could improve the eradication rate, and vitamin supplementation might be effective at a high dosage. However, antioxidant supplements have no impact on improving side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao-Bin Yang-Ou
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yi Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yin Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Nong-Hua Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|