2
|
Conti CB, Cereatti F, Grassia R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: the fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy dilemma. Is the best needle yet to come? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11:454-471. [PMID: 31523377 PMCID: PMC6715568 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is currently the standard of care for sampling pancreatic solid masses by using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The accuracy of the technique is reported to be high, especially if coupled with the rapid on site evaluation (ROSE), and it has a high safety profile. However, FNA presents some limitations, such as the small amount of tissue that can be collected and the inability of obtaining a core tissue with intact histological architecture, which is relevant to perform immunohistochemical analysis, molecular profiling and, therefore, targeted therapies. Moreover, the presence of the ROSE by an expert cytopathologist is very important to maximize the diagnostic yield of FNA technique; however, it is not widely available, especially in small centers. Hence, the introduction of EUS fine needle biopsy (FNB) with a new generation of needles, which show a high safety profile too and a satisfying diagnostic accuracy even in the absence of ROSE, could be the key to overcome the limitations of FNA. However, FNB has not yet shown diagnostic superiority over FNA. Considering all the technical aspects of FNA and FNB, the different types of needle currently available, comparisons in term of diagnostic yield, and the different techniques of sampling, a tailored approach should be used in order to determine the needle that is most appropriate for the different specific scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Benedetta Conti
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Cr 26100, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Cereatti
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Cr 26100, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassia
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Cr 26100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Villa NA, Berzosa M, Wallace MB, Raijman I. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: The wet suction technique. Endosc Ultrasound 2016; 5:17-20. [PMID: 26879162 PMCID: PMC4770617 DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.175877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become a fundamental tool in obtaining cytopathological diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. When sampling solid lesions of the pancreas, the endosonographer can use two suction techniques to enhance tissue acquisition; the dry and the wet suction techniques. The standard dry suction technique relies on applying negative pressure suction on the proximal end of the needle after the stylet is removed with a pre-vacuum syringe. The wet suction technique relies on pre-flushing the needle with saline to replace the column of air with fluid followed by aspiration the proximal end by using a prefilled syringe with saline. A new modified wet suction technique (hybrid suction technique) relies on preloading the needle with saline, but having continuous negative pressure with a pre-vacuum syringe to avoid manual intermittent suction. Tissue acquisition can be enhanced by applying fluid dynamic principles to the current aspiration techniques, such as the column of water used in the needle of the wet technique. In this review, we will focus on EUS-FNA using the wet suction technique for sampling of pancreatic solid lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Isaac Raijman
- Digestive Associates of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Z, Jiang C. Endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of mediastinal diseases. Open Med (Wars) 2015; 10:560-565. [PMID: 28352755 PMCID: PMC5368883 DOI: 10.1515/med-2015-0095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
EUS is a useful tool for diagnosis of mediastinal diseases. EUS-FNA plays an important role in staging of lung cancer and in tissue acquisition in patients with mediastinal masses. In this review, the following issues will be addressed: EUS-FNA and EBUS-TBNA, metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes diagnosed by EUS, EUS in assessment of mediastinal lymph node status for staging of lung cancer, mediastinal lymphoma diagnosed by EUS, sarcoidosis and tuberculosis diagnosed by EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiguo Wang
- The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, China
| | - Chunmeng Jiang
- The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, NO.467, Zhongshan Road, 116027 Dalian, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jenssen C, Annema JT, Clementsen P, Cui XW, Borst MM, Dietrich CF. Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part 2: mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques, clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7:E439-58. [PMID: 26623120 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging has gained importance in pulmonary medicine over the last decades including conventional transcutaneous ultrasound (TUS), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS). Mediastinal lymph node (MLN) staging affects the management of patients with both operable and inoperable lung cancer (e.g., surgery vs. combined chemoradiation therapy). Tissue sampling is often indicated for accurate nodal staging. Recent international lung cancer staging guidelines clearly state that endosonography should be the initial tissue sampling test over surgical staging. Mediastinal nodes can be sampled from the airways [endobronchial ultrasound combined with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)] or the esophagus [endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)]. EBUS and EUS have a complementary diagnostic yield and in combination virtually all MLNs can be biopsied. Additionally endosonography has an excellent yield in assessing granulomas in patients suspected of sarcoidosis. The aim of this review in two integrative parts is to discuss the current role and future perspectives of all ultrasound techniques available for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and mediastinal staging of lung cancer. A specific emphasis will be on learning mediastinal endosonography. Part 1 deals with an introduction into ultrasound techniques, MLN anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques and part 2 with the clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Jenssen
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 5 Medical Department 2, 6 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jouke Tabe Annema
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 5 Medical Department 2, 6 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Paul Clementsen
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 5 Medical Department 2, 6 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Xin-Wu Cui
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 5 Medical Department 2, 6 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Maximilian Borst
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 5 Medical Department 2, 6 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Frank Dietrich
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 5 Medical Department 2, 6 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dietrich CF, Annema JT, Clementsen P, Cui XW, Borst MM, Jenssen C. Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques. J Thorac Dis 2015; 7:E311-25. [PMID: 26543620 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.09.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging has gained importance in pulmonary medicine over the last decades including conventional transcutaneous ultrasound (TUS), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS). Mediastinal lymph node staging affects the management of patients with both operable and inoperable lung cancer (e.g., surgery vs. combined chemoradiation therapy). Tissue sampling is often indicated for accurate nodal staging. Recent international lung cancer staging guidelines clearly state that endosonography (EUS and EBUS) should be the initial tissue sampling test over surgical staging. Mediastinal nodes can be sampled from the airways [EBUS combined with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)] or the esophagus [EUS fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)]. EBUS and EUS have a complementary diagnostic yield and in combination virtually all mediastinal lymph nodes can be biopsied. Additionally endosonography has an excellent yield in assessing granulomas in patients suspected of sarcoidosis. The aim of this review, in two integrative parts, is to discuss the current role and future perspectives of all ultrasound techniques available for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and mediastinal staging of lung cancer. A specific emphasis will be on learning mediastinal endosonography. Part I is dealing with an introduction into ultrasound techniques, mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques and part II with the clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Frank Dietrich
- 1 Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark and Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Jouke Tabe Annema
- 1 Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark and Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Paul Clementsen
- 1 Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark and Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Xin Wu Cui
- 1 Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark and Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Mathias Maximilian Borst
- 1 Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark and Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Christian Jenssen
- 1 Medical Department 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; 3 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark and Centre for Clinical Education, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Hellerup, Denmark ; 4 Medical Department 1, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany ; 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|