Association between calcium administration and outcomes during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the emergency department

The association between albumin-corrected calcium and prognosis in patients with cardiac arrest: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrest (CA) is one of the leading causes of death globally, characterized by high incidence and mortality. It is of particular significance to determine the prognosis of patients with CA early and accurately. Therefore, we aim to investigate the correlation between albumin-corrected calcium (ACC) and the prognosis in patients diagnosed with CA.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from medical information mart for intensive care IV database. Patients were divided into two groups (survival and non-survival groups), according to the 90-day prognosis. In the Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis, the cut-off values (8.86 and 10.32) were obtained to categorize patients into three groups: low ACC group (< 8.86), moderate ACC group (8.86-10.32), and high ACC group (> 10.32). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator with a ten-fold cross-validation regression analysis was performed to identify variables linked to the mortality. The inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address the confounding factors, and a weighted cohort was generated. RCS, Kaplan-Meier curve, and Cox regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between ACC and the mortality. Sensitivity analysis was employed to validate the stability of the results.

RESULTS

Cut-off values for ACC of 8.86 and 10.32 were determined. RCS analyses showed that there was an overall non-linear trend relationship between ACC and the risk of 90-day and 360-day mortalities. After IPTW adjustment, compared to the moderate ACC group, the 90-day and 360-day mortalities in the high ACC group were higher (P < 0.05). The Cox analyses before and after IPTW adjustment showed that both low ACC and high ACC group were independent risk factors for 90-day and 360-day all-cause mortality in patients with CA (P < 0.05). The results obtained from sensitivity analyses indicated the stability of the findings. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that 90- and 360-day cumulative survival rates in the low ACC and high ACC groups were lower than that in the moderate ACC group (χ2 = 11.350, P = 0.003; χ2 = 14.110, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both low ACC (< 8.86) and high ACC groups (> 10.32) were independent risk factors for 90-day and 360-day all-cause mortality in patients with CA (P < 0.05). For those CA patients with high and low ACC, it deserved the attention of clinicians.

How effective is extracorporeal life support for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest initiated at the emergency department? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is commonly initiated for adults experiencing cardiac arrest within the cardiac catheterization lab or the intensive care unit. However, the potential benefit of ECPR for these patients in the emergency department (ED) remains undocumented. This study aims to assess the benefit of ECPR initiated in the ED for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing ECPR initiated in the ED versus conventional CPR. Relevant articles were identified by searching several databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane collaborations up to July 31, 2022. Pooled estimates were calculated using the inverse variance heterogeneity method, while heterogeneity was evaluated using Q and I2 statistics. The risk of bias in included studies was evaluated using validated bias assessment tools. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was survival to hospital discharge or 30-day survival. Sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the benefits of ED-initiated ECPR in studies utilizing propensity score (PPS) analysis. Publication bias was assessed using Doi plots and the Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included a total of eight studies comprising 51,173 patients. ED-initiated ECPR may not be associated with a significant increase in favorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-6.70, I2 = 96%). However, this intervention may be linked to improved survival to hospital discharge (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.23-5.01, I2 = 17%). Notably, when analyzing only PPS data, ED-initiated ECPR demonstrated efficacy for both favorable neurological outcomes (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.26-2.83, I2 = 21%) and survival to hospital discharge (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.52-7.49, I2 = 57%). Publication bias was detected for primary (LFK index 2.50) and secondary (LFK index 2.14) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that ED-initiated ECPR may not offer significant benefits in terms of favorable neurological outcomes for OHCA patients. However, it may be associated with increased survival to hospital discharge. Future studies should prioritize randomized trials with larger sample sizes and strive for homogeneity in patient populations to obtain more robust evidence in this area.

Association Between Admission Ionized Calcium Level and Neurological Outcome of Patients with Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Pathophysiological processes following initial insult are complex and not fully understood. Ionized calcium (Ca++) is an essential cofactor in the coagulation cascade and platelet aggregation, and hypocalcemia may contribute to the progression of intracranial bleeding. On the other hand, Ca++ is an important mediator of cell damage after TBI and cellular hypocalcemia may have a neuroprotective effect after brain injury. We hypothesized that early hypocalcemia might have an adverse effect on the neurological outcome of patients suffering from isolated severe TBI. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between admission Ca++ level and the neurological outcome of these patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study of all patients admitted between January 2014 and December 2020 due to isolated severe TBI, which was defined as head abbreviated injury score ≥ 4 and an absence of severe (abbreviated injury score > 2) extracranial injuries. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological status at discharge, defined by a modified Rankin Scale of 0-2. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine whether admission hypocalcemia (Ca++  < 1.16 mmol L-1) is an independent predictor of neurological status at discharge.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 201 patients. Hypocalcemia was common among patients with isolated severe TBI (73.1%). Most of the patients had mild hypocalcemia (1 < Ca++  < 1.16 mmol L-1), and only 13 (6.5%) patients had Ca++  ≤ 1.00 mmol L-1. In the entire cohort, hypocalcemia was independently associated with higher rates of good neurological status at discharge (adjusted odds ratio of 3.03, 95% confidence interval 1.11-8.33, p = 0.03). In the subgroup of 81 patients with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale > 8, 52 (64.2%) had hypocalcemia. Good neurological status at discharge was recorded in 28 (53.8%) of hypocalcemic patients compared with 14 (17.2%) of those with normal Ca++ (p = 0.002). In multivariate analyses, hypocalcemia was independently associated with good neurological status at discharge (adjusted odds ratio of 6.67, 95% confidence interval 1.39-33.33, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that among patients with isolated severe TBI, mild admission hypocalcemia is associated with better neurological status at hospital discharge. The prognostic value of Ca++ may be greater among patients with admission Glasgow Coma Scale > 8. Trials are needed to investigate the role of hypocalcemia in brain injury.

Calcium during cardiac arrest: A systematic review

Aim

To perform a systematic review of administration of calcium compared to no calcium during cardiac arrest.

Methods

The search included Medline (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus and was conducted on September 30, 2022. The population included adults and children in any setting with cardiac arrest. The outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation, survival, survival with favourable neurologic outcome to hospital discharge and 30 days or longer, and quality of life outcome. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and ROBINS-I were performed to assess risk of bias for controlled and observational studies, respectively.

Results

The systematic review identified 4 studies on 3 randomised controlled trials on 554 adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, 8 observational studies on 2,731 adult cardiac arrest patients, and 3 observational studies on 17,449 paediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) patients. The randomised controlled and observational studies showed that routine calcium administration during cardiac arrest did not improve the outcome of adult OHCA or IHCA or paediatric IHCA. The risk of bias for the adult trials was low for one recent trial and high for two earlier trials, with randomization as the primary source of bias. The risk of bias for the individual observational studies was assessed to be critical due to confounding. The certainty of evidence was assessed to be moderate for adult OHCA and low for adult and paediatric IHCA. Heterogeneity across studies precluded any meaningful meta-analyses.

Conclusions

This systematic review found no evidence that routine calcium administration improves the outcomes of cardiac arrest in adults or children.PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022349641.

How Epinephrine Administration Interval Impacts the Outcomes of Resuscitation during Adult Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Current guidelines for treating cardiac arrest recommend administering 1 mg of epinephrine every 3−5 min. However, this interval is based solely on expert opinion. We aimed to investigate the impact of the epinephrine administration interval (EAI) on resuscitation outcomes in adults with cardiac arrest. We systematically reviewed the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. We included studies comparing different EAIs in adult cardiac arrest patients with reported neurological outcomes. Pooled estimates were calculated using the IVhet meta-analysis, and the heterogeneities were assessed using Q and I2 statistics. We evaluated the study risk of bias and overall quality using validated bias assessment tools. Three studies were included. All were classified as “good quality” studies. Only two reported the primary outcome. Compared with a recommended EAI of 3−5 min, a favorable neurological outcome was not significantly different in patients with the other frequencies: for <3 min, odds ratio (OR) 1.93 (95% CI: 0.82−4.54); for >5 min, OR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.55−1.87). For survival to hospital discharge, administering epinephrine for less than 3 min was not associated with a good outcome (OR 1.66, 95% CI: 0.89−3.10). Moreover, EAI of >5 min did not pose a benefit (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.68−1.11). Our review showed that EAI during CPR was not associated with better hospital outcomes. Further clinical trials are necessary to determine the optimal dosing interval for epinephrine in adults with cardiac arrest.