Isolated testicular metastasis from prostatic adenocarcinoma

Testicular metastasis of prostate adenocarcinoma: the other side of orchiepididymitis

Background

Metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma is a rare event and there are few references to this topic. We report an unusual case of prostate cancer metastasis and review of contemporary literature. Moreover, we discuss the pathogenesis and the clinical aspects of this event.

Case presentation

A 70-year-old patient was admitted to the hospital for right scrotal pain. The ultrasound examination described an increase in testicular size, suggesting the possibility of orchiepididymitis. Past medical history reported a previous prostate adenocarcinoma. Inflammatory blood tests were normal. Importantly, PSA was 3.3 ng/ml. PET scan positivity in the scrotum raised suspicion of a relapse. Therefore, he underwent right orchiectomy.

Conclusion

Although metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma is rare, a correct diagnosis is of paramount importance because the therapy changes accordingly. Patients who complain of scrotal pain need to be examined accurately. Although the most common cause behind this symptom is infectious, the patient's past medical history should be reviewed to exclude previous malignancies.

[Secondary tumors localized in testis]

Testis tumors are uncommon in oncology, and testicular metastasis from distant solid tumors are even rarer. We present two cases encountered in our department of pathology in CHU de Rennes, France. Moreover, we collected all reported cases in the Medline/PubMed databases of non-hematopoietic secondary testis tumors in adults, excluding autopsy studies, to propose an integrative study on this topic. In total, we report 98 cases of secondary testis lesions to prostate (n=38, 38.77 %), colorectal (n=19, 19.39%), gastric (n=12, 12.24%), kidney (n=7, 7.14%), lung (n=6, 6.12%) and other primary cancers. The median age at diagnosis was 66.5 years. We identified significantly more prostate adenocarcinoma (P<0.0001) when the primary tumor was known and significantly more colorectal adenocarcinoma (P=0.035) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (P=0.002) when the primary tumor was unknown. The age at diagnosis was older when the primary tumor was known (P=0.007). We present the challenges for the diagnosis and propose some elements for diagnosis orientation. Finally, we discuss the possible ways of metastatic dissemination from primary site to testis, as illustrated by the two cases we present.

Bilateral secondary testicular, epididymal and spermatic cords carcinoma of prostatic origin: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Prostatic carcinoma is emerging as the most common male malignancy in Nigeria and the second most common male cancer worldwide. Patients often present with locally advances stages, and common sites of metastasis are the spine, pelvis, chest, and long bones. Metastases to the testes and spermatic cords are reputed to be rare and may be indicative of a worse outcome, when they occur. We recently encountered a clinical case of bilateral testicular, epididymal and spermatic cords prostatic cancer metastases.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 71-year-old Nigerian man, who presented at our hospital with 1-month-old complaints of inability to walk together with low back and bilateral thigh pains. This presentation had been preceded by a 5-month history of lower urinary tract symptoms. On examination, the prostate was hard and nodular as were the left testis and spermatic cord. On histological assessment of a needle biopsy, prostatic adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 5 + 5 = 10) was diagnosed. A subsequent therapeutic bilateral total orchidectomy specimen was found to contain metastatic prostatic carcinoma deposits, in the testes, epididymides, and spermatic cords. Although our patient is currently doing well postoperatively on zoledronic acid, ketoconazole, bicalutamide, and tamsulosin, he is being re-evaluated periodically for any feature of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Since it has implications for eventual outcome, every clinically suspicious therapeutic orchidectomy specimen should be subjected to a detailed histopathological examination in order to exclude secondaries from the primary prostatic malignancy.