Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Preventive Analgesia with Diclofenac and Buprenorphine Patch versus Single Diclofenac Patch for Postoperative Pain following General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

The Efficacy of Buprenorphine in Preoperative and Postoperative Patients: A Literature Review

Although research suggests that less than half of individuals who have surgical procedures report effective postoperative pain alleviation, the majority of patients endure acute postoperative discomfort. To lessen and manage postoperative pain, a variety of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative treatments and management methods are available. For several years an opioid called buprenorphine has become an effective tool to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) in patients across many different demographics. It has however endured barriers to its usage which can be seen when treating patients with chronic pain or postoperative pain, who also have an OUD. While buprenorphine may be underutilized within the clinical setting, the significantly low rates of chronic abuse when using the drug allow it to be an attractive treatment option for patients. This paper aims to explore a wide range of studies that examine buprenorphine as an analgesic and how it can be used for preoperative pain and postoperative pain. This paper will give an in-depth analysis of buprenorphine and its use in patients with chronic pain as well as OUD. A systematic literature review was performed by identifying studies through the database PubMed. The data from various publications were gathered with preference being given to publications within the last three years. We reviewed studies that examined the pain level of the patients after having buprenorphine. Despite long-available pharmacologic evidence and clinical research, buprenorphine has maintained a mystique as an analgesic. Its usage in the treatment of OUD was further influenced by its well-known safety benefits and relative lack of psychomimetic side effects compared to other opioids. For patients accustomed to long-term, high-dose opioids who may be experiencing hyperalgesia but have not been informed about this phenomenon by their doctors or the potential for buprenorphine to resolve it, buprenorphine's pronounced antihyperalgesic effect is a compelling pharmacologic characteristic that makes it particularly attractive as an option. When used in pre-, peri-, and postoperative circumstances, buprenorphine provides various pain-management benefits and patients can still benefit from effective pain management from mu-opioid agonists while remaining on buprenorphine. Buprenorphine can be continued at a reduced dose as needed to avoid withdrawal symptoms and to improve the analgesic efficiency of mu-opioid agonists used in combination with acute postoperative pain in light of the evidence at hand. Buprenorphine administration needs a patient-centered, multidisciplinary strategy that considers the benefits and drawbacks of the many perioperative therapy options to have the best chance of success.

Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Buprenorphine for Acute Postoperative Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Transdermal buprenorphine (TBUP) may have some advantages for the management of acute postoperative pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of TBUP compared to other analgesics or placebo for acute postoperative pain. A systematic search was conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) until December 26, 2022. The search included randomized controlled trials comparing TBUP versus other analgesics or placebo for acute postoperative pain. A certainty assessment was conducted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. The protocol for this review was registered on Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022318601). In total, 15 studies involving 1,205 participants were included that compared TBUP versus fentanyl (n = 2), celecoxib (n = 3), placebo (n = 2), tramadol (n = 5), diclofenac (n = 3), parecoxib (n = 1), and flurbiprofen (n = 1). Meta-analyses were conducted for 3 comparators that involved 2 studies each. There was no significant difference in pain between TBUP 10 mcg/h versus fentanyl 25 mcg/h (standardized mean difference [SMD] -.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] -.86 to .81, P = .95, I2 = 85%). TBUP 10 mcg/h was associated with less pain compared to celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (SMD -.32, 95% CI -.58 to -.05, P = .02, I2 = 0%) and placebo (SMD -2.29, 95% CI -4.32 to -.27, P = .03, I2 = 94%). The GRADE assessment showed a very low certainty of evidence for all comparisons. There is insufficient evidence that TBUP improves pain control compared to other analgesics for acute postoperative pain. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the use of TBUP to other analgesics for postoperative pain. The results showed that there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of TBUP in this setting. The findings will help clinicians select the most appropriate opioid regimens for postoperative pain.

Analgesic efficacy of intra-peritoneal instillation of dexamethasone and bupivacaine versus bupivacaine following laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A randomised, double-blind controlled study

Background and Aims

Laparoscopy is associated with acute pain. We compared the effectiveness of intra-peritoneal dexamethasone with bupivacaine versus bupivacaine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for postoperative analgesia.

Methods

This randomised study was conducted after approval from the institutional ethics committee and 84 patients were randomly allocated into bupivacaine with dexamethasone group (BD) (received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 16 mg dexamethasone), and bupivacaine group (BB) (received 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine intra-peritoneally). Data analysis was done using R version 4.2.1. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score, total rescue analgesic dose, and time required for the first analgesic between groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test or t-test appropriately.

Results

VAS score was significantly lower in the BD group compared to the BB group until 2 h post-operatively with a mean difference of - 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5, -0.53), P < 0.001. The total rescue analgesic dose consumed was lower in the BD group (60.71 mg [29.80]) compared to the BB group (73.20 mg [11.57]) with a mean difference of - 12.5 mg (95% CI - 22.3, -2.68), P = 0.013. In addition, the time taken for the requirement of the first rescue analgesic was significantly longer in the BD group (417.1 min [276.0]) compared to the BB group (219.4 min [226.1]) with a mean difference of 197.7 (95% CI 75, 320), P = 0.002.

Conclusion

Intra-peritoneal instillation of 16 mg dexamethasone with 0.25% bupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduces post-operative pain and requirement of rescue analgesic compared to 0.25% bupivacaine alone.