Association between 5α-reductase inhibitors therapy and incidence, cancer-specific mortality, and progression of prostate cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis

Prostate cancer specific mortality after 5α-reductase inhibitors medication in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Our study was conducted to investigate the effect of 5-ARI on the death rate from prostate cancer by means of an updated meta-analysis using related data.

METHODS

We did comprehensive literature searches using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through July 2019. We evaluated the risk of bias in such studies using the ROBINS-I tool and analyzed deaths from cancer and deaths from all causes using HR.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 11 studies. The pooled overall HRs for cancer-specific deaths between 5-ARI treatment versus non-exposed groups were 0.937 (95% CI: 0.730, 1.201). In the subgroup moderator analysis, the number of patients and additional medication variables were significantly associated with deaths from all causes (p = 0.022 and p = 0.005, respectively). For detecting the publication bias or small-study effect in the included studies, we performed Begg and Mazumdar's correlation test (0.851 and 0.573) and Egger's regression coefficient test (0.035 and 0.245) and ​suggested that there was no evidence of publication bias or small-study effect in this meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated that exposure to 5-ARI had no close association between the overall death rate or cancer-specific deaths. To confirm these results, well-designed prospective studies with large samples are required.

Prostate cancer patients can benefit from 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor treatment: a meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) in treating prostate cancer (PCa) have not been fully determined. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs for PCa patients.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of online databases was conducted to obtain comparative studies exploring the effectiveness and safety of 5ARIs in treating PCa up to October 2019. Summarized odds ratio s (OR s) or hazard ratio s (HR s) were calculated to compare the outcomes between 5ARI and control groups. Our meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018109809.

Results

A total of 2,277 patients from 10 studies were included. No significant difference was found in prostate-specific antigen progression between two groups (OR = 0.82, 95% CI [0.52–1.29], P = 0.40). However, 5ARI treatment significantly reduced the total progression of PCa (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.48–0.77], P < 0.0001), especially for patients with local (OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.44–0.73], P < 0.00001) and low-Gleason score (≤7) PCa (OR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.48–0.84], P = 0.002). Additionally, 5ARIs also significantly prolonged the progression-free survival time (HR = 0.57, 95% CI [0.34–0.96], P = 0.04) for PCa patients. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of PCa recurrence, metastasis, biopsy reclassification, and side-effects between two groups.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that 5ARI treatment can benefit patients with local and low Gleason score (≤7) PCa, especially in delaying the disease progression. More studies with larger sample size and comprehensive study design are still needed to verify our outcomes.