Acute Paraplegia Revealing a Hemorrhagic Cauda Equina Paragangliomas

Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor: a report of three cases and review of the literature with focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management

INTRODUCTION

Cauda equina neuroendocrine tumors (CENETs), previously described as cauda equina paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare and well-vascularized benign entities which can be often misdiagnosed with other intradural tumors more common in this anatomical site, such as ependymomas and neurinomas. We describe three cases of CENETs observed at our institution with particular focus on differential diagnosis and postoperative management. Since the lack of guidelines, we performed a literature review to identify factors that can predict recurrence and influence postoperative decision making.

CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW

We report on three patients, two of them presenting with a clinical history of lower back pain and sciatica. In all cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine with and without Gd-DTPA revealed an intradural lesion with strong contrast enhancement, first described as atypical ependymoma or schwannoma. A complete tumor resection was achieved in all cases, the histopathological diagnosis classified the tumors as CENETs. In our literature review, a total of 688 articles were screened and 162 patients were included. Patients demographic data, clinical symptoms, resection and recurrence were recorded.

DISCUSSION

Differential diagnosis between CENETs and other more common tumors affecting cauda equina region, such as ependymomas or schwannomas (neurinomas), is still very challenging. Due to the lack of specific clinical or radiological characteristics, a correct preoperative diagnosis is almost impossible. With this paper we want to point out that CENETs must be considered in the differential diagnosis, most of all in case of entities with atypical radiological features. According to the literature, tumor recurrence after gross total resection is unlikely, while a long-term follow-up is recommended in case of subtotal resection or local aggressive behavior.

Primary Paraganglioma of the Spine: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features and Surgical Management in Cauda Equina vs Non-Cauda Equina Lesions

BACKGROUND

Primary spine paragangliomas are rare tumors. Surgical resection plays a role, but aggressive lesions are challenging. We reviewed the literature on primary spine paragangliomas.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include studies on primary spine paragangliomas. Clinical-radiological features, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed and compared between cauda-equina vs non-cauda-equina tumors.

RESULTS

We included 143 studies comprising 334 patients. Median age was 46 years (range, 6-85). The most frequent symptoms were lower-back (64.1%) and radicular (53.9%) pain, and sympathetic in 18 patients (5.4%). Cauda-equina paragangliomas (84.1%) had frequently lumbar (49.1%) or lumbosacral (29%) locations. Non-cauda-equina tumors were mostly in the thoracic (11.4%), thoracolumbar (5.1%), and cervical (3.6%) spine. Median tumor diameter was 2.5cm (range, 0.5-13.0). Surgical resection (98.5%) was preferred over biopsy (1.5%). Decompressive laminectomy (53%) and spine fusion (6.9%) were also performed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered in 39 patients (11.7%) with aggressive tumors. Post-treatment symptomatic improvement was described in 86.2% cases. Median follow-up was 19.5 months (range, 0.1-468.0), and 23 patients (3.9%) had tumor recurrences. No significant differences were found between cauda-equina vs non-cauda-equina tumors.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is effective and safe in treating primary spine paragangliomas; however, adjuvant treatments may be needed for aggressive lesions.

Paraganglioma of the filum terminal: Case report and review of the literature

Paraganglioma of the filum terminal/cauda equina is a rare slow growing tumor which originates from the ectopic sympathetic neurons. Surgically, total excision may be difficult for this well demarcated tumor surrounded by couple of rootlets but is usually possible in nearly all cases. Actually, final diagnosis cannot be determined intraoperatively, but is possible only after an immunohistochemical staining. Herein, the authors present a middle age woman whose initial symptoms were lower back pain and radiculopathy. Her MRI was found to be compatible with a cauda equina tumor. During her excisional surgery a hard and relatively vascular tumor was fully removed. The Immunohistochemical results were compatible with paraganglioma of the filum terminale. In addition to case presentation, thorough review of the literature is also done.

Paragangliomas of the spine: a retrospective case series in a national reference French center

INTRODUCTION

Primary paragangliomas (PG) of the spine are extremely rare entities. The present study reviews our experience over a period of 30 years.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single center, observational study. Patients surgically treated for a spinal PG with confirmed anatomopathological diagnosis were included. The McCormick classification was used as a reference for clinical evaluation. Follow-up MRI and clinical assessment took place at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery and on yearly basis after.

RESULTS

Six cases have been operated in our institution. The mean age was 37.8 (median 35.5, 30-53). The mean follow-up period was 9.6 years (median 9.5, 1-23). Preoperative duration of symptoms varied between a few hours to 4 years. Low back pain was most common sign. One presented with hemorrhage and acute onset of paraplegia. All patients underwent single surgery, with the exception of one case, which had two surgeries on the same anatomical site and a third surgery on another location of the same tumor type. Preoperatively, McCormick scale was I in four cases, and II and IV in one case, respectively. Postoperatively, all patients in McCormick I retained the same class; one patient in McCormick II passed to McCormick III; the case in McCormick IV recovered to McCormick II. Five of eight surgeries achieved total resection, while two surgeries accomplished a partial microsurgical excision and one a gross total resection. Three patients had spinal leptomeningeal dissemination. Two of them benefited from extended spine radiotherapy, while the other of a "wait-and-scan" policy. Spinal leptomeningeal dissemination was stable in all patients at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We consider surgery as primary treatment in all PG. In our experience, preoperative diagnosis is difficult and caution must be taken to perioperative course in these cases. We do not routinely perform postoperative radiation if there is a residual tumor. We regularly perform clinical and radiological follow-up, so as to be able to document recurrent cases, which have been reported even up to 30 years after primary surgical excision.