Morphometric Evaluation of Craniocervical Junction by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Method

Novelties for increased safety in cranio-vertebral surgery: a review

The cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ) was formerly considered a surgical "no man's land" due to its complex anatomical and biomechanical features. Surgical approaches and hardware instrumentation have had to be tailored in order to achieve successful outcomes. Nowadays, thanks to the ongoing development of new technologies and surgical techniques, CVJ surgery has come to be widely performed in many spine centers. Accordingly, there is a drive to explore novel solutions and technological nuances that make CVJ surgery safer, faster, and more precise. Improved outcome in CVJ surgery has been achieved thanks to increased safety allowing for reduction in complication rates. The Authors present the latest technological advancements in CVJ surgery in terms of imaging, biomaterials, navigation, robotics, customized implants, 3D-printed technology, video-assisted approaches and neuromonitoring.

Variations in the shape of foramen magnum at the base of human skulls among Indians in Rajasthan

Variations in the shape of foramen magnum can affect the normal anatomy of vital structures passing through it. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the various shapes of foramen magnum by using CT scans performed in patients of Indian population to establish clinical correlation. A total of 314 CT images of human skull base obtained from the Department of Radio-diagnosis, Geetanjali Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan were used in the present study. All the patients' CT scans were observed to determine the shape of foramen magnum. They were classified into one of the following shapes: Oval, round, tetragonal, egg shaped, hexagonal, pentagonal and irregular. The shapes of the foramen magnum in CT scans were oval in 39.09%, round in 22.61%, tetragonal in 12.10%, hexagonal in 10.51%, irregular in 7.96%, pentagonal in 5.41% and egg shaped in 1.59% CT images. Data shows that it is easy to operate at the base of skull in case of round, oval and hexagonal shape foramen magnum, as the working space is more in these shapes.

Occipital condylar avulsion fractures in the acute trauma setting: Stable or unstable injury?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Occipital condylar avulsion fractures are considered potentially unstable, associated with craniocervical dissociation spectrum injuries, and thought to carry a relatively high mortality rate based on the current literature. The purpose of this study was to identify patient with acute, occipital condylar avulsion fractures and evaluate for the incidence of concomitant cervical osteoligamentous trauma and craniocervical dissociation spectrum injury on cervical spine CT and MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who suffered an inferomedial occipital condylar avulsion fracture were identified retrospectively using Nuance mPower software. Cervical spine CT and MRI reports performed within 48 h for this patient cohort were then reviewed by two CAQ certified neuroradiologists. Confirmation of an occipital condylar avulsion fracture was recorded along with any concomitant craniocervical junction injury. Relevant clinical history, including management and outcomes, was recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were identified with an inferomedial fracture of the occipital condyle. Of the 85% of patients who underwent cervical MRI, all but one patient demonstrated a 'negative' MRI without major craniocervical junction ligamentous injury. These patients were treated conservatively with external bracing without persistent neurologic deficits upon 4-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferomedial fractures of the occipital condyle are currently classified as potentially unstable fractures based on the Anderson classification system. Our data suggest that an isolated occipital condylar avulsion fracture without an additional C1-C2 fracture or widening of the atlanto-occipital joint space is likely a stable injury that can be treated conservatively with excellent clinical outcomes.

Tectorial Membrane Injury, Frequently Identified in Adult Trauma Patients Who Undergo Occipital-Cervical Fusion for Craniocervical Instability

Background In the absence of frank craniocervical dissociation, there is a lack of consensus regarding what patterns of craniocervical junction ligamentous injuries require occipital-cervical fusion. This study was undertaken to examine the integrity of the craniocervical junction ligaments and analyze clinical outcomes in patients who underwent occipital-cervical fusion for craniocervical junction injury. Methods Adult patients requiring occipital-cervical fusion were identified retrospectively utilizing keyword searches in cervical computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging reports between 2012 and 2020 using Nuance mPower software (Nuance, Burlington, MA). The cervical magnetic resonance imaging examinations for these patients were reviewed for craniocervical ligamentous injury by two neuroradiologists. Descriptions of craniocervical junction injuries, demographic information, clinical history, surgical management, and global outcomes were recorded. Results Nine adult patients were identified with an acute, post-traumatic craniocervical junction injury requiring occipital-cervical fusion. All nine patients demonstrated a ligamentous tear in at least one of the four major craniocervical junction ligaments - the occipital condylar-C1 capsular ligaments, alar ligaments, tectorial membrane, and posterior atlantooccipital membrane. The tectorial membrane was the most commonly torn ligament followed by the alar ligament(s), posterior atlantooccipital membrane, and capsular ligament(s). There was wide variability in the number of major craniocervical junction ligaments torn, ranging from one ligament to all four ligaments. Four patients suffered persistent neurologic deficits following surgery. Conclusion Craniocervical injury is best evaluated by cervical magnetic resonance imaging. In the absence of overt craniocervical dissociation, we propose that an injury of the tectorial membrane in the adult population may indicate patients with significant craniocervical instability, possibly necessitating occipital-cervical fusion.

Comparison of MR Ultrashort Echo Time and Optimized 3D-Multiecho In-Phase Sequence to Computed Tomography for Assessment of the Osseous Craniocervical Junction

BACKGROUND

To assess changes of the craniocervical junction (CCJ), computed tomography (CT) is considered the reference standard. Recent advances in bone depiction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enable high-quality visualization of osseous structures. Consequently, MRI may serve as an alternative to CT, without the use of ionizing radiation.

PURPOSE

To compare two MRI sequences optimized for bone visualization to the CT reference standard in the assessment of the osseous CCJ.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION/SUBJECTS

Twenty-seven decedents and five healthy volunteers.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3T/ultrashort-echo time gradient echo (UTE) and optimized 3D-multiecho in-phase gradient echo sequences (FRACTURE).

ASSESSMENT

All decedents were scanned with both MRI sequences and CT. Three observers rated degeneration to obtain a score for the upper (atlanto-dental and left/right atlanto-occipital joint) and for the lower part of the CCJ (left and right atlanto-axial joint). Two reader rated the following quantitative parameters: basion-axial-interval, atlanto-dental-interval, atlanto-occipital-interval, Powers-ratio, and signal/contrast-to-noise-ratio. As a proof of concept, five healthy volunteers were scanned with both MRI sequences.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Degeneration was assessed on a Likert scale by three independent observers. Interrater and intermodality reliability were calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient. To compare distance measurements between examination methods, a Friedman test, between-degenerative ratings, and a Kruskal-Wallis test were performed.

RESULTS

Degenerative ratings of the CCJ between MRI sequences and CT showed a good interrater and intermodality agreement. MRI sequences tended to underestimate the degree of degeneration compared to CT, and this became more marked with increasing degeneration severity. There were no significant relationships between distance measurements and the degree of degeneration (P_CT = 0.62, P_UTE = 0.64, P_FRACTURE = 0.67). The in vivo examination proved the feasibility of both MRI methods in a clinical setting.

DATA CONCLUSION

Quantitative and qualitative ratings on MR images were comparable to CT images; thus, MRI may be a valid alternative to CT assessing the CCJ.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE

3.