A Rare Case of a High-Grade Astroblastoma with 5-Year Follow-up

Thirteen-year long-term follow-up in a rare case of anaplastic astroblastoma: What makes the difference?

Background:

Astroblastomas are uncommon neuroepithelial tumors of the central nervous system with a distinct, yet, controversial radiological, histological, and molecular profile. Debatable differences between low- and high-grade astroblastoma have been reported in the medical literature; indeed, despite the increasing relevance of molecular genetic profiling in the realm of astroblastoma, its application is still in its early stages. As a result, the diagnostic criteria for astroblastoma remain undecided with yet no real consensus on the most ideal management.

Case Description:

This report describes a case of astroblastoma diagnosed 13 years ago in a young woman who despite six episodes of recurrence, transformation, and progression was able to retain a perfomace status of 0 by World Health Organization standard, throughout.

Conclusion:

This report discusses the clinical, radiological, histological features, and management of this rare tumor with an extraordinarily long survival, with an aim to strengthen the literature on management options. To the best of our knowledge, this is the longest surviving case of anaplastic astroblastoma reported in the available medical literature.

Neuroimaging of astroblastomas: A case series and systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Astroblastoma is a rare type of glial tumor, histologically classified into two types with different prognoses: high and low grade. We aimed to investigate the CT and MRI findings of astroblastomas by collecting studies with analyzable neuroimaging data and extracting the imaging features useful for tumor grading.

METHODS

We searched for reports of pathologically proven astroblastomas with analyzable neuroimaging data using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Sixty-five studies with 71 patients with astroblastomas met the criteria for a systematic review. We added eight patients from our hospital, resulting in a final study cohort of 79 patients. The proportion of high-grade tumors was compared in groups based on the morphology (typical and atypical) using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

High- and low-grade tumors were 35/71 (49.3%) and 36/71 (50.7%), respectively. There was a significant difference in the proportion of high-grade tumors based on the tumor morphology (typical morphology: high-grade = 33/58 [56.9%] vs. atypical morphology, 2/13 [15.4%], p = .012). The reviews of neuroimaging findings were performed using the images included in each article. The articles had missing data due to the heterogeneity of the collected studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed neuroimaging features were clarified, including tumor location, margin status, morphology, CT attenuation, MRI signal intensity, and contrast enhancement pattern. The classification of tumor morphology may help predict the tumor's histological grade, contributing to clinical care and future oncologic research.