A Review of Common Endoscopic Intracranial Approaches

Neuronavigation-Guided Transcortical-Transventricular Endoport-Assisted Endoscopic Resection for Thalamic Lesions: Preliminary Experience

BACKGROUND

Surgery for thalamic lesions is generally challenging because they are deep-seated lesions surrounded by vital neurovascular structures. Whether neuronavigation-guided transcortical-transventricular endoport-assisted endoscopic resection for thalamic lesions is feasible remains to be further evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 8 who patients received neuronavigation-guided transcortical-transventricular endoport-assisted endoscopic resection for thalamic lesions was performed. Preoperative and tumor-related variables and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

All lesions were located in the medial part of the thalamus, and most of them expanded forward, downward, or backward. Median size of lesions was 31 mm (range, 16-52 mm). Final pathology results confirmed that 1 case was a cavernous malformation, 3 were pilocytic astrocytomas, and 4 were glioblastomas. None of the patients had postoperative seizures. Gross total resection and long-term postoperative survival were achieved in all patients with benign lesions, while near-total resection (>90%) was achieved in 3 of 4 patients (75%) with glioblastoma, and subtotal resection (<90%) was achieved in 1 patient (25%). Among patients with glioblastoma, 1 patient remained free of recurrence at 16 months of follow-up; the other 3 patients had worse Karnofsky performance scale scores after surgery and died within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the advantages of neuronavigation, endoscopy, and endoport techniques via the middle frontal gyrus approach can safely and effectively remove benign lesions in the medial part of the thalamus. This procedure can also be performed in well-selected cases of glioblastoma and likely confers a survival advantage for this rapidly and universally fatal disease.

The use of augmented reality in transsphenoidal surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Augmented reality (AR) has become a promising tool in neurosurgery. It can minimise the anatomical challenges faced by conventional endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal reoperations and can assist in intraoperative guidance, preoperative planning, and surgical training.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this systematic review are to describe, compare, and evaluate the use of AR in endoscopic and microscopic transsphenoidal surgery, incorporating the latest primary research.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to explore and evaluate existing primary evidence for using AR in transsphenoidal surgery. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted from database inception to 11th August 2021 for primary data on the use of AR in microscopic and endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Additional articles were identified through searches on PubMed, Google Scholar, JSTOR, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Engineering Village, IEEE transactions, and HDAS. A synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) analysis was employed quantitatively and qualitatively on the impact of AR on landmark identification, intraoperative navigation, accuracy, time, surgeon experience, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In this systematic review, 17 studies were included in the final analysis. The main findings were that AR provides a convincing improvement to landmark identification, intraoperative navigation, and surgeon experience in transsphenoidal surgery, with a further positive effect on accuracy and time. It did not demonstrate a convincing positive effect on patient outcomes. No studies reported comparative mortalities, morbidities, or cost-benefit indications.

CONCLUSION

AR-guided transsphenoidal surgery, both endoscopic and microscopic, is associated with an overall improvement in the areas of intraoperative guidance and surgeon experience as compared with their conventional counterparts. However, literature on this area, particularly comparative data and evidence, is very limited. More studies with similar methodologies and quantitative outcomes are required to perform appropriate meta-analyses and to draw significant conclusions.

Endoscopic Assistance in the Deep and Narrow Spaces of the Brain-Microscopic Tumor Surgery Supported by the New Micro-Inspection Tool QEVO® (Technical Note)

Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the innovative micro-inspection tool QEVO® (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany) as an endoscopic adjunct to microscopes for better visualization of the surgical field in complex deep-seated intracranial tumors in infants and adults.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively assessed the surgical videos of 25 consecutive patients with 26 complex intracranial lesions (time frame 2018–2020). Lesions were classified according to their anatomical area: 1 = sellar region (n = 6), 2 = intra-ventricular (except IV.ventricle, n = 9), 3 = IV.ventricle and rhomboid fossa (n = 4), and 4 = cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and foramen magnum (n = 7). Indications to use the QEVO® tool were divided into five “QEVO® categories”: A = target localization, B = tailoring of the approach, C = looking beyond the lesion, D = resection control, and E = inspection of remote areas.

Results: Overall, the most frequent indications for using the QEVO® tool were categories D (n = 19), C (n = 17), and E (n = 16). QEVO® categories B (n = 8) and A (n = 5) were mainly applied to intra-ventricular procedures (anatomical area 2).

Discussion: The new micro-inspection tool QEVO® is a powerful endoscopic device to support the comprehensive visualization of complex intracranial lesions and thus instantly increases intraoperative morphological understanding. However, its use is restricted to the specific properties of the respective anatomical area.