Controlled Trial to Compare Therapeutic Efficacy of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Plus Choroid Plexus Cauterization with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Infants with Obstructive Hydrocephalus

Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy versus Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Patients with Obstructive Hydrocephalus: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) are surgical methods for treating obstructive hydrocephalus. However, there is still disagreement regarding the most effective technique, in terms of both operative success and postoperative complications. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of these two methods in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus. We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ETV and VPS in pediatric or adult patients with obstructive hydrocephalus were included. The outcomes included were operative success, postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, postoperative infection, postoperative or intraoperative bleeding, blockage rate, and mortality. The risk ratio (RR) was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was evaluated with I 2 statistics. We used a fixed-effects model for outcomes with I 2  < 25% and DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model for other conditions. The Cochrane collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials was used for risk-of-bias assessment. R, version 4.2.1, was used for statistical analyses. Of the 2,353 identified studies, 5 RCTs were included, involving 310 patients with obstructive hydrocephalus, of which 163 underwent ETV. There was a significant difference in favor of ETV for postoperative infection (risk ratio [RR]: 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04-0.33; p  < 0.0001; I 2  = 0%) and blockage rate (RR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.75; p  = 0.02; I 2  = 53%). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between groups for the postoperative or intraoperative bleeding (RR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.17-1.15; p  = 0.09; I 2  = 0%), postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.22-1.92; p  = 0.44; I 2  = 18%), operative success (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.77-1.82; p  = 0.44; I 2  = 84%), and mortality (RR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.03-1.09; p  = 0.06; I 2  = 0%). Three RCTs had some concerns about the risk of bias and one RCT had a high risk of bias due to the process of randomization and selection of reported results. Thus, this meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating ETV compared with VPS demonstrated that although there is no superiority of ETV in terms of operative success, the incidence of complications was significantly higher in patients who underwent VPS. Our results suggest that the use of ETV provides greater benefits for the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus. However, more RCTs are needed to corroborate the superiority of ETV.

Morbidity and etiology-based success rate of combined endoscopic ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1918 infants

Approaches to the treatment of infant hydrocephalus vary among centers. Standard shunting carries a significant infection rate, an unpredictable time-to-failure, and the life-long risk of recurrent failures. Combined choroid plexus cauterization (CPC) and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) have been increasingly employed over the past decade as an alternative approach in an attempt to avoid shunt dependency. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the reported morbidity associated with ETV/CPC and its rate of success reported for specific etiologies of infant hydrocephalus. The protocol of this study was registered with the International prospective register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the following registration number: CRD 42022343898. The study utilized four databases of medical literature to perform a systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Several parameters were extracted from the included studies including authors, publication year, region, study design, sample size, mean age, success rate, complication rate, reported complications, hydrocephalus etiology, median time-to-failure, secondary management after failure, and mean follow-up time. The outcomes of interest, success, and complication rates were pooled using 95% confidence intervals (CI) and a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria from an initial search result of 472 studies. The study included 1938 infants (1918 of which were included in the meta-analysis). The overall success rate of combined ETV/CPC is 0.59 (95% CI (0.53, 0.64), I2 = 82%). Etiology-based success rate is 0.71, 0.70, 0.64, and 0.52 for aqueductal stenosis, myelomeningocele, postinfectious hydrocephalus, and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, respectively. The overall complication rate is 0.04 (95% CI (0.02, 0.05), I2 = 14%). Our study presents a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence on the use of ETV/CPC for treating hydrocephalus in infants. The findings demonstrate the potential efficacy of this procedure; however, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations inherent in the included studies, such as selection bias and limited follow-up, which could have impacted the reported outcomes.

Clinical outcomes in pediatric hydrocephalus patients treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization (ETV+CPC) is a novel procedure for infant hydrocephalus that was developed in sub-Saharan Africa to mitigate the risks associated with permanent implanted shunt hardware. This study summarizes the hydrocephalus literature surrounding the ETV+CPC intraoperative abandonment rate, perioperative mortality rate, cerebrospinal fluid infection rate, and failure rate.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed a prespecified protocol and abides by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from database inception to October 2019. Studies included controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies of patients with hydrocephalus younger than 18 years of age treated with ETV+CPC. Pooled estimates were calculated using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling, and the significance of subgroup analyses was tested using meta-regression. The quality of the pooled outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

After screening and reviewing 12,321 citations, the authors found 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate for the ETV+CPC failure rate was 0.44 (95% CI 0.37-0.51). Subgroup analysis by geographic income level showed statistical significance (p < 0.01), with lower-middle-income countries having a lower failure rate (0.32, 95% CI 0.28-0.36) than high-income countries (0.53, 95% CI 0.47-0.60). No difference in failure rate was found between hydrocephalus etiology (p = 0.09) or definition of failure (p = 0.24). The pooled estimate for perioperative mortality rate (n = 7 studies) was 0.001 (95% CI 0.00-0.004), the intraoperative abandonment rate (n = 5 studies) was 0.04 (95% CI 0.01-0.08), and the postoperative CSF infection rate (n = 5 studies) was 0.0004 (95% CI 0.00-0.003). All pooled outcomes were found to be low-quality evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive pooled estimate for the ETV+CPC failure rate to date and demonstrates, for the first time, a statistically significant difference in failure rate by geographic income level. It also provides the first reported pooled estimates for the risk of ETV+CPC perioperative mortality, intraoperative abandonment, and CSF infection. The low quality of this evidence highlights the need for further research to improve the understanding of these critical clinical outcomes and their relevant explanatory variables and thus to appreciate which patients may benefit most from an ETV+CPC. Systematic review registration no.: CRD42020160149 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).

Pragmatism in Pediatric Neurosurgery: More Than a Pipe Dream? A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis

BACKGROUND

Classic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) form the cornerstone for medical guidelines and protocols. However, in neurosurgery, RCTs are not always applicable to everyday clinical practice. Pragmatic controlled trials aim to incorporate real-life data with the preservation of the methodologic quality. This study is a systematic literature review of all pediatric neurosurgical RCTs published between 2000 and 2020 and an analysis of their pragmatism.

METHODS

An electronic database search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify all relevant trials. Pragmatism was evaluated retrospectively on 9 domains: eligibility, recruitment, setting, organization, flexibility (delivery and adherence), follow-up, primary outcome, and primary analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 1862 studies included, 15 met the inclusion criteria. On average, studies scored between equally pragmatic/explanatory and rather pragmatic (M = 3.59, standard deviation [SD] = 0.56). Lowest ratings were seen for setting (M = 2.80, SD = 1.66) and eligibility (M = 3.20, SD = 1.66). Highest scores of pragmatism were given to analysis (M = 4.67, SD = 0.82) and intervention organization (M = 4.60, SD = 1.06). There was no significant difference between studies based on number of patients included, main subject, or publication year.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric neurosurgical RCTs scored reasonably well on overall pragmatism. In the future, there will be a greater need for pragmatic controlled trials in pediatric neurosurgery to bridge the divide between real-life data and reliable methodological quality. There is an opportunity to develop further applications of pragmatism tailored to surgical interventions.

Rigid versus flexible neuroendoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for the management of pediatric hydrocephalus

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), with or without choroid plexus cauterization (±CPC), is a technique used for the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus. Rigid or flexible neuroendoscopy can be used, but few studies directly compare the two techniques. Here, the authors sought to compare these methods in treating pediatric hydrocephalus.

METHODS

A systematic MEDLINE search was conducted using combinations of keywords: "flexible," "rigid," "endoscope/endoscopic," "ETV," and "hydrocephalus." Inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language studies with patients 2 years of age and younger who had undergone ETV±CPC using rigid or flexible endoscopy for hydrocephalus. The primary outcome was ETV success (i.e., without the need for further CSF diversion procedures). Secondary outcomes included ETV-related and other complications. Statistical significance was determined via independent t-tests and Mood's median tests.

RESULTS

Forty-eight articles met the study inclusion criteria: 37 involving rigid endoscopy, 10 involving flexible endoscopy, and 1 propensity scored-matched comparison. A cumulative 560 patients had undergone 578 rigid ETV±CPC, and 661 patients had undergone 672 flexible ETV±CPC. The flexible endoscopy cohort had a significantly lower average age at the time of the procedure (0.33 vs 0.53 years, p = 0.001) and a lower preoperatively predicted ETV success score (median 40, IQR 32.5-57.5 vs 62.5, IQR 50-70; p = 0.033). Average ETV success rates in the rigid versus flexible groups were 54.98% and 59.65% (p = 0.63), respectively. ETV-related complication rates did not differ significantly at 0.63% for flexible endoscopy and 3.46% for rigid endoscopy (p = 0.30). There was no significant difference in ETV success or complication rate in comparing ETV, ETV+CPC, and ETV with other concurrent procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lower expected ETV success scores for patients treated with flexible endoscopy, the authors found similar ETV success and complication rates for ETV±CPC with flexible versus rigid endoscopy, as reported in the literature. Further direct comparison between the techniques is necessary.

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt in pediatric and adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment options for hydrocephalus include endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). Some ambiguity remains regarding indications, safety, and efficacy for these procedures in different clinical scenarios. The objective of the present study was to pool the available evidence to compare outcomes among patients with hydrocephalus undergoing ETV versus VPS. A systematic search of the literature was conducted via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library through 11/29/2018 to identify studies evaluating failure and complication rates, following ETV or VPS. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochrane Q test and the I² value. Heterogeneity sources were explored through subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Twenty-three studies (five randomized control trials (RCTs) and 18 observational studies) were meta-analyzed. Comparing ETV to VPS, failure rate was not statistically significantly different with a pooled relative risk (RR) of 1.48, 95%CI (0.85, 2.59) for RCTs and 1.17 (0.89, 1.53) for cohort studies; P-interaction: 0.44. Complication rates were not statistically significantly different between ETV and VPS in RCTs (RR: 1.34, 95%CI: 0.50, 3.59) but were statistically significant for prospective cohort studies (RR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30, 0.78); P-interaction: 0.07. Length of hospital stay was no different, when comparing ETV and VPS. These results remained unchanged when stratifying by intervention type and when regressing on age when possible. No significant differences in failure rate were observed between ETV and VPS. ETV was found to have lower complication rates than VPS in prospective cohort studies but not in RCTs. Further research is needed to identify the specific patient populations who may be better suited for one intervention versus another.

Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy versus Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Patients with Obstructive Hydrocephalus: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) are 2 surgical methods used for the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus. However, the efficacy and safety of these 2 procedures are unknown. Therefore we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficiency of ETV and VPS in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus.

METHODS

In January 2019, a comprehensive search strategy of 3 electronic databases was initiated. A systematic search from database inception to December 30, 2018, on clinical outcome, safety, and efficiency of ETV and VPS in the treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus was conducted. The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main outcomes included postoperative hematoma, postoperative infection, postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, blockage rate, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 546 studies identified, 4 RCTs involving 250 patients met our inclusion criteria. The pooled results show that ETV was associated with lower incidence of postoperative infection (risk ratio [RR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.32, P = 0.0002); postoperative hematoma (RR 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.88, P = 0.03); and blockage rate (RR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.60, P = 0.001) compared with VPS. Compared with VPS, ETV had no significant effect on incidence rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (RR 2.00, 95% CI: 0.30-13.16, P = 0.47) and mortality rates (RR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.03-1.09, P = 0.06), but there have been no deaths in patients treated with ETV.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating ETV and VPS, the incidence of complications and mortality was higher with the VPS procedure, and therefore greater benefits can be achieved using ETV.