EC-IC Bypass; Our Experience of Cerebral Revascularization with Intraoperative Dual-Image Video Angiography (Diva)

Efficacy and Safety of Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Surgery for Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Treating complex posterior circulation aneurysms poses challenges, and extracranial to intracranial (EC-IC) bypass techniques are potential therapeutic options. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach for posterior circulation aneurysms remain unclear. The study's objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of EC-IC bypass in these aneurysms.

METHODS

Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review on EC-IC revascularization for posterior circulation aneurysms. Included studies had at least 4 patients and reported data on mortality, patency, complications, or clinical outcomes. Favorable clinical outcomes were defined as modified Rankin Scale below 3 or Glasgow Outcome Scale above 3, and complications were any issues related to the bypass procedure.

RESULTS

From 3036 articles reviewed, 22 studies involving 196 patients who underwent 210 EC-IC bypass procedures for posterior circulation aneurysms were selected. The median follow-up period of 14 studies was 31.66 months (6-61 months). Final follow-up indicated a high bypass patency rate of 96% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%-100%; I2 = 12%], with a mortality rate of 5% [95% CI: 1%-9%; I2 = 0%]. Additionally, 83% [95% CI: 70%-96%; I2 = 77%] of patients showed good outcomes at the last follow-up. Complications were observed in 40% [95% CI: 26%-55%; I2 = 80%]. Heterogeneity was associated with specific studies.

CONCLUSIONS

EC-IC bypass procedures are a viable treatment option for posterior circulation aneurysms, with high bypass patency rates and favorable clinical outcomes. However, complications, especially neurological deficits, exist. Open revascularization remains essential for neurovascular surgeons dealing with complex aneurysms.

Clinical Analysis of Microvascular Reconstruction Combined With Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients With Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarctions

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of microvascular reconstruction combined with decompressive craniectomy (DHC) in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions (MMCA).

METHODS

We searched for patients with MMCA and aged＜60 years old, postoperative survival of more than 3 months, consistent with decompression of bone flap removal. Patients were divided into experimental group and control group according to whether they underwent emergency vascular revascularization within 5 days after onset of ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

A total of sixpatients were included in the treatment group and 12 patients in the control group. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of the treatment group was lower than that of the control group seven days after operation, but the difference was not statistically significant; 3 months after surgery, modified ranking scale (mRs) score in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.002); mRs scores of the treatment group 3 months after surgery were significantly different from those before surgery (P < 0.05), but no such difference was found in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with decompressive craniectomy, open surgical revascularization can improve early cerebral perfusion in MMCA patients, and neurological recovery is better at 3 months after operation. By ensuring that surgeons are properly trained and hospitals are equipped, open surgical revascularization can be a treatment option for patients with MMCA.

Complementary Tools in Cerebral Bypass Surgery

Cerebral revascularization surgery has been advanced by the refinement of several adjunctive tools. These tools include perioperative blood thinners, intraoperative spasmolytic agents, electrophysiological monitoring, and methods for assessing bypass patency or marking arteriotomies. Despite the array of options, the proper usage and comparative advantages of different complements in cerebral bypass have not been well-cataloged elsewhere. In this literature review, we describe the appropriate usage, benefits, and limitations of various bypass adjuncts. Understanding these adjuncts can help surgeons ensure that they receive reliable intraoperative information about bypass function and minimize the risk of serious complications. Overall, this review provides a succinct reference for neurosurgeons on various cerebrovascular bypass adjuncts.