Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Adverse Events: Oral Dysesthesia and Toothache - A Retrospective Study

Oral Neuropathy Associated with Commonly used Chemotherapeutic Agents: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents; its incidence largely varies, depending on type, dose, agent and preexisting risk factors. Oral-and-perioral-CIPN (OCIPN) is underreported. Neurotoxic agents can cause jaw pain or numbness. This review aims to present available data on OCIPN RECENT FINDINGS: A narrative literature review, following SANRA guidelines was conducted. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched until September 2023. Articles referring to neuropathy or neuropathic pain due to head and neck cancer, head and neck radiotherapy, oropharyngeal mucositis, infection or post-surgical pain were excluded. Platinum-based chemotherapeutics, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, immunomodulatory and alkylating agents can cause OCIPN. Platinum-based chemotherapeutics can cause orofacial cold sensitivity, orofacial and jaw pain, oral cavity tingling and teeth hypersensitivity. Taxanes may induce oral cavity and tongue numbness and tingling as well as hot hypersensitivity. Vinca alkaloids may cause jaw, teeth and lips pain and oral mucosa hyperalgesia. Immunomodulatory drugs can cause lips, tongue and perioral numbness, while alkylating agents induce tongue and lips tingling and teeth cold-hypersensitivity. Chemotherapy may cause OCIPN due to changes in cellular structure and function, like alterations in membrane receptors and neurotransmission. OCIPN should be documented and physicians, dentists and health care providers should be alerted.

Eubacterium coprostanoligenes alleviates chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucositis by enhancing intestinal mucus barrier

Chemotherapy-induced mucositis represents a severe adverse outcome of cancer treatment, significantly curtailing the efficacy of these treatments and, in some cases, resulting in fatal consequences. Despite identifying intestinal epithelial cell damage as a key factor in chemotherapy-induced mucositis, the paucity of effective treatments for such damage is evident. In our study, we discovered that Eubacterium coprostanoligenes promotes mucin secretion by goblet cells, thereby fortifying the integrity of the intestinal mucus barrier. This enhanced barrier function serves to resist microbial invasion and subsequently reduces the inflammatory response. Importantly, this effect remains unobtrusive to the anti-tumor efficacy of chemotherapy drugs. Mechanistically, E. copr up-regulates the expression of AUF1, leading to the stabilization of Muc2 mRNA and an increase in mucin synthesis in goblet cells. An especially significant finding is that E. copr activates the AhR pathway, thereby promoting the expression of AUF1. In summary, our results strongly indicate that E. copr enhances the intestinal mucus barrier, effectively alleviating chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucositis by activating the AhR/AUF1 pathway, consequently enhancing Muc2 mRNA stability.

Burning mouth in oncology care: a systematic review

Burning mouth, also referred to as oral dysesthesia, is an underreported condition among cancer patients that may represent an early symptom of cancer or an adverse effect of treatment. This review sought to characterize this symptom in oncology care where burning symptoms may occur. A systematic review of the literature was performed based on the PRISMA statement, and the protocol was registered at PROSPERO database. A structured search was done using eight databases. The process of study selection was conducted in two distinct phases. The JBI Critical Appraisal Tools were utilized to evaluate the risk of bias in the studies included. Of the total number of studies assessed, sixteen met the eligibility criteria. Of these studies included, 7 were case reports, 7 cross-sectional studies, and 2 non-randomized clinical trials. Most studies presented low risk of bias (n = 9), while the remaining studies were evaluated and scored as moderate (n = 5) or high (n = 2) risk of bias. Burning mouth was reported as a first symptom of cancer in three studies, and as an adverse event of radiotherapy (n = 2), chemoradiotherapy (n = 2), and chemotherapy (n = 9). Burning mouth was a first symptom in 0.62% of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), and 3.3% of patients with pain as chief complaint. Oral dysesthesia prevalence was 13.6% in patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced oral adverse events. The symptom of burning mouth should be examined in oncology care, as it may be underreported and therefore undertreated. New therapies may be related to a higher risk of oral burning and studies assessing approach to management are needed. Current management borrows from the current management of burning mouth in the non-cancer setting.

Burning Mouth Syndrome and Hypertension: Prevalence, Gender Differences and Association with Pain and Psycho-Social Characteristics-A Case Control Study

BACKGROUND

To assess the prevalence of hypertension (HTN) in burning mouth syndrome (BMS) patients and to investigate its relationship with sociodemographic factors, pain and the psychological profile.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted by enrolling 242 BMS patients and 242 controls matched for age and gender. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, and all participants completed numeric rating scale (NRS), the short-form of the McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the Hamilton rating scale for anxiety and depression (HAM-A, HAM-D), the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS).

RESULTS

The BMS patients presented with a statistically significant higher prevalence of HTN compared to that in the controls (55% versus 33.5%; p-value: <0.001) and higher median scores of the NRS, SF-MPQ, HAM-A, HAM-D, PSQI and ESS (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis in the BMS patients indicated positive correlations between HTN and age, systemic diseases, drug consumption and anxiety (p-value: <0.001) and these predictors were responsible for 11.3% of the HTN variance in the BMS patients, when considered together.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HTN was significantly higher in the BMS patients, since ageing, the presence of comorbidities, drug consumption and anxiety were potential predictors. Further studies are needed to better investigate the relationship between BMS and HTN.