Evaluation of Electrocautery and Stainless Steel Scalpel in Oral Mucoperiosteal Incision for Mandibular Anterior Fracture

Tissue response to different incision tools in animal model

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the repair of incisions performed with microdissection electrocautery tip, conventional electrocautery tip, high potency diode laser, and conventional scalpel blade in a in vivo model.

METHODS

Different incisions were performed in adults Holtzman rats using the four types of instruments: microdissection electrocautery tip, conventional electrocautery tip, high potency diode laser, and conventional scalpel blade, in different periods of healing process. Thirty rats were divided into 5 groups, according to the period of euthanasia-24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 14 days. All animals received four incisions, each by a different method. Quantitative histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Picrosirius Red staining.

RESULTS

Inflammatory profile and tissue repair presented small statistically significance differences comparing conventional scalpel blade and microdissection tip; moreover, both presented quantitatively superior to the others.

CONCLUSION

It is believed that the microdissection tip can perform a dynamic incision just as a common scalpel blade, but more effective. Furthermore, it can promote a better hemostatic control of the surgical field that is comparable to conventional electrocautery tip without affecting tissue repair.

Postoperative wound dehiscence in mandibular fractures

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the occurrence and causes of non-infection-related surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) in intraorally treated mandibular fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with one or two fractures of the dentate part of the mandible treated surgically via an intraoral approach were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome variable was SWD. Associations between patient-, fracture- and surgery-related variables and SWD were evaluated.

RESULTS

Altogether 232 patients with 270 mandibular angle, body, symphysis and/or parasymphysis fractures were included in the analysis. In all, 22 SWDs were detected. These occurred in 9.5% of patients and in 8.1% of fractures. Surgery performed at night-time showed a significantly higher SWD rate than daytime surgeries (p = .012). Additionally, a significantly greater SWD rate was found among smokers (p = .041). Other studied variables remained statistically non-significant for SWD. In a multivariate analysis, night-time was the only significant independent variable with an odds ratio of 3.297 (95% CI 1.238 - 8.780, p = .017) for SWD.

CONCLUSION

The approach or closure technique used and the fracture type had only a minor effect on non-infection-related SWD in patients with mandibular fractures. To avoid SWDs, mandibular fracture surgeries should be conducted during the daytime with adequate support from an experienced surgeon.

Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery

Background

Due to the sensitivity of the surgical site and a higher probability of injury, the use of a scalpel and electrocautery to create an incision in the spine is discussed. In this study, we will compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery.

Materials and methods

This study was conducted in Iran as a randomized controlled trial with double-blinding (1,401). Sixty candidates for spine surgery were randomly divided into two groups of 30 using electrocautery (A) and a scalpel (B) based on available sampling. The VAS scale was used to assess postoperative pain. The duration of the incision and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The infection and fluid secretions were determined using the Southampton scoring scale. Utilizing the Manchester scar scale, the wound healing status was evaluated. The SPSS version 16 software was used for data analysis (t-test, Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA).

Results

The electrocautery group had substantially lower bleeding, pain, and wound healing rates than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). However, the electrocautery group had significantly longer surgical times, more secretions, and a higher infection rate than the scalpel group (P > 0.05). In terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Electrocautery reduces postoperative hemorrhage and, potentially, postoperative pain in patients. However, as the duration of surgery increases, so does the duration of anesthesia, and patient safety decreases. Additionally, the risk of infection increases in the electrocautery group compared to the scalpel group, and the rate of wound healing decreases.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.irct.ir/, identifier (IRCT20230222057496N1).

The Effect of Diathermy Power Settings on Oral Cavity Mucosal Contraction: A Rat Model

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The effects of different electrocautery power settings on mucosal contraction and margin status in the oral cavity have not been well established. The aim of this study was to examine how different levels of electrocautery energy outputs affect oral mucosal tissue margins.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal model.

METHODS

A model of 23 adult rats was used (two specimens per rat). After anesthetizing the animals, a 6-mm biopsy punch marked the resection margin on the buccal mucosa (one per cheek). The specimens were excised by means of three energy levels, a cold knife, and monopolar diathermy that was set on either 20 W or 30 W cut modes. The specimens were evaluated for extent of contraction.

RESULTS

A total of 45 samples were obtained and measured, including 15 specimens in the cold-knife group, 15 specimens in the 20 W group, and 15 specimens in the 30 W group. The median diameters of the specimens after resection were 4.5 mm for the cold-knife group (interquartile range [IQR] = 4.0-5.0), 3.5 mm for the 20 W group (IQR = 3.5-4.0), and 2.8 mm for the 30 W group (IQR = 2.5-3.0). Specimen contraction was 25.0%, 41.7%, and 53.3%, respectively. The difference in shrinkage between each pair was statistically significant: cold knife versus 20 W, P = .001; cold knife versus 30 W, P < .0001; and 20 W versus 30 W, P < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

Diathermy power settings result in a significant difference of mucosal tissue contraction, with higher outputs resulting in a narrower mucosal margin. It is imperative that the surgical team take into consideration the diathermy settings during initial resection planning. Laryngoscope, 131:E1514-E1518, 2021.