Comparison of TORS with Conventional Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinomas in T1-T4 Lesions

Safety and outcome of three-dimensional transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS) is widely used in Japan, and conventional two-dimensional (2D) endoscopic methods have been established. Three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic surgery offers superior distance perception because it provides stereoscopic views. Recently, we have developed 3D endoscopy for TOVS (3D TOVS).

METHODS

This study included 46 patients with pharyngeal cancer who underwent 3D TOVS. The perioperative complications and survival curves were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

One patient with oropharyngeal cancer who underwent neck dissection and transoral resection simultaneously experienced postoperative hemorrhage of the neck. Another patient with oropharyngeal cancer underwent hemostasis for postoperative pharyngeal hemorrhage. There was one case of aspiration pneumonia. One patient developed cervical lymph node recurrence; however, there was no local recurrence or primary mortality. The 2-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control rates, locoregional control rate, and invasive disease-free survival were 90.9%, 100%, 100%, 97.4%, and 79.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional endoscopy can be safely applied to TOVS.

Surgical Treatment for Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Narrative Review

Background and Objectives: to describe current scientific knowledge regarding the treatment options in advanced oropharyngeal cancer. The standard care for advanced oropharyngeal cancer (OPSCC) has been chemoradiotherapy, although surgical approaches followed by adjuvant treatment have been proposed. The best therapy for each patient should be decided by an interdisciplinary tumour-board. Different strategies should be considered for the specific patient's treatment: surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy or combinations of them. The treatment choice is influenced by tumour variability and prognostic factors, but it also depends on cancer extension, extranodal extension, nervous invasion, human papilloma virus (HPV) presence, making the decisional algorithm not always clear. HPV-related OPSCC is strongly associated with a favourable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rate (DSS); by contrast, HPV-negative OPSCC often flags a worse prognosis. Consequently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) differentiates OPSCC treatment and prognosis based on HPV status. Methods: we carried out a review of current scientific literature to analyze the different indications and limitations of surgical treatment options in OPSCC stage III and IV. Conclusion: robotic surgery or open approaches with reconstructive flaps can be considered in advanced stages, resulting in the de-intensification of subsequent systemic therapy and fewer related side effects. Furthermore, in the event of the primary failure of systemic therapy or disease recurrence, the surgical approach constitutes an additional therapeutic option which lengthens patient survival functions.

[Analysis of the effect of free posterior lateral peroneal artery perforator flap of lower leg in repairing oropharyngeal cancer]

Objective:To analyze the clinical effect of free posterior lateral peroneal artery perforator flap of lower leg in repairing postoperative defect of oropharyngeal carcinoma. Methods:Thirty-six patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from June 2016 to June 2019 were analyzed and followed up, eighteen patients were treated with free posterior lateral peroneal artery perforator flap of the lower leg to repair the postoperative defects（experimental group）, and eighteen patients were treated with free forearm flap（control group）. The survival rate of the transplanted flap, the wound stageⅠhealing rate and average hospitalization time were compared between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the 1-year and 3-year survival rates of patients after operation, and log-rank test was used to compare the difference between the survival curves of the two groups; The recovery of swallowing and palatopharyngeal closure function of patients in the two groups at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after operation was calculated and statistically analyzed through the water swallow test and the air blowing method. Results:There was one case of skin flap necrosis in both the experimental group and the control group, and the survival rate was 94.4%. The wound stageⅠhealing rate in the surgical area was 94.4% in both groups. The wound healing rates of the donor area in the experimental group and the control group were 100.0% and 94.4% respectively. The average hospitalization time of the experimental group and the control group was 16.9 days and 17.2 days, respectively, with no significant difference （P>0.05）. The overall survival rates of all patients at 1-year and 3-year were 91.2% and 66.5% respectively; The 1-year and 3-year survival rates of the experimental group and the control group were 94.1%, 69.3% and 88.2%, 63.7%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups （P>0.05）. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates of P16+ and P16 - patients were 100.0%, 80.0% and 85.7%, 64.3%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups （P>0.05）. There was no significant difference in the evaluation of swallowing and velopharyngeal closure function between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after operation （P>0.05）, but there was a significant difference at 12 and 18 months after operation （P<0.05）. Conclusion:The anatomic position of the perforating vessels of the free posterior lateral peroneal artery perforator flap of the lower leg is constant, and it can be prepared into single leaf, multi leaf, chimeric and other flaps according to the tissue defect space. And the concealed supply area can be directly drawn to suture. At the same time, the skin flap has strong plasticity. Therefore, the skin flap can be used as a common skin flap to repair the defects after the operation of oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Treatment outcomes of primary surgery versus chemoradiotherapy for T4 oropharyngeal cancers

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been the standard of care for locally advanced diseases regardless of human papillomavirus infection status. Other treatment options include surgery followed by adjuvant therapy and induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT or radiotherapy. However, for locally advanced T4 laryngeal or hypopharyngeal diseases, surgery is preferred over CCRT. Given the improvement in the functional outcomes of surgery, examining the oncologic outcomes in OPSCC patients is critical. This study aimed to determine whether differences in overall survival (OS) exist between surgery and CCRT. Oropharyngeal cancer patients included in the cancer registry of our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with T4 disease who underwent curative treatment were identified. In this study, the primary and secondary outcomes were OS and disease-free survival (DFS), respectively. Potential confounding factors were also evaluated. Details regarding recurrence pattern were listed. From 2014 to 2018, 74 newly diagnosed oropharyngeal cancer patients were identified from our cancer registry database, 60 of whom satisfied our inclusion criteria. Our findings showed an OS of 25.5 months and DFS of 17.5 months. No significant difference in both of OS and DFS were observed between the surgery and CCRT cohorts. Sex, stage, second primary cancer, IC, and primary treatment were not correlated with DFS. Male sex was the only significant factor identified, with an HR of 0.2 for OS (95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.71). No significant difference in both OS and DFS were observed between the CCRT and surgery cohorts. CCRT remains the standard of care for locally advanced disease.

Present and Future Trends in Transoral Surgical Intervention: Maximal Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery, and Transoral Robotic Surgery

Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) has undergone a renaissance/metamorphosis as a specialty and in the technologic innovations that have enhanced the surgical care of patients. This article reviews traditional maximal transoral approaches in the management of common pathologic lesions seen by OMFS, and compares these techniques with a literature review that applies minimally invasive technology and innovative robotic surgery (transoral robotic surgery) to treat similar lesions. The traditional approaches described in this article have transcended generations and future trends are suggested that will improve the training of the OMFS legacy as clinicians move forward in the care of patients.

Early T1-T2 stage p16+ oropharyngeal tumours. Role of upfront transoral robotic surgery in de-escalation treatment strategies. A review of the current literature

Human papillomavirus is responsible of approximately 70% oropharyngeal tumours and is related with more favourable outcomes. It has led to an increasing interest for de-escalation treatment strategies such as Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS). A literature review was performed searching for the role of TORS as de-escalation modality of treatment in patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Special attention was paid to the potential advantage offered by TORS in reducing adjuvant radiation therapy. Six questions were formulated. 67 studies were selected. Several trials analysing the role of upfront TORS to treat early stage p16+ OPSCC and the possibility of reducing the adjuvant radiotherapy were founded. A lot of studies based on the experience of single centres show promising results. Nevertheless to date no definitive data can be extrapolated. The continued investigation of this line of de-escalation therapy with randomized prospective clinical trials is needed.

[Surgical therapy of oropharyngeal cancer-state of the art]

Surgical therapy, regardless of the procedure, remains of great importance for today's treatment of oropharyngeal carcinomas, despite advances in radiation and immunotherapy. The individual treatment plan should be defined in discussion with the patient and in an interdisciplinary tumor conference, taking into account the likelihood of achieving of tumor-free resection margins and an acceptable postoperative quality of life. With regard to conventional and possibly also open surgical procedures, a good overview of the surgical site-particularly in the case of more extensive carcinomas and challenging patient anatomy-and simplified reconstructability of the defect region are decisive aspects. Endoscopically, microsurgically, or even robot-assisted minimally invasive procedures have the advantage of precise and gentle removal of tumor tissue with improved maintenance of function. Overall, selection of the appropriate surgical procedure remains an individual decision based on tumor size, the facilities at the tumor center, and the surgeon's experience. The extent of surgical intervention, also with regard to simultaneous neck dissection, depends on tumor stage. In the case of oropharyngeal carcinomas, there will be an increasing distinction between human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative and HPV-positive tumors in the future; however, the therapeutic strategy is currently identical. Upcoming clinical trials will show whether treatment de-escalation is appropriate depending on HPV infection status.

Head and neck robotic surgery combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Fascinating, but feasible?

Robotic approaches and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are both strategies that evolved driven by the need to reduce impact of head and neck oncological surgery in terms of operative timing, morbidity, hospitalization time, and aesthetic results. A comprehensive review of the scientific literature was performed on PubMed, Embase, ResearchGate, Cochrane, and CENTRAL electronic databases with the aim to discuss the role that these two approaches can play together in the management of head and neck cancers (HNCs) of various sites. Dedicated publications on the combined robotics and SLN biopsy approaches resulted, up to now very limited, while their separated application in non-shared fields is gaining strength. However, the possibility to implement and combine technologies to minimize sequelae of head and neck surgery is an interesting and evolving topic.